|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
|
I'm a newbie here; trying to design a sub for HT use. My goals are 105dB at 20-80 Hz.
I modeled an ESB sub using a Dayton 15" Titanic driver in WinISD and the initial graphs look very promising. However, I'm probably making numerous newbie mistakes and would like comments from the more experienced crowd here. I've posted my model at http://www.nogginboink.com/subwoofer_design1.htm. I'd greatly appreciate any feedback any of you might have on this design. -Nogginboink
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tasmania, launceston
|
WOW man I would be happy with that everything you said I agree with except the impendece peak because i dont understand that yet, mine peaked at 14 ohms @ 46hz
and yes if read correctly put in the parmetric equealizer it will change output and all of the results, im guessing you have a bass boost at 35hz |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
|
It seems to be very nice. I hope you included the parametric equalizer in the excursion graphs.
You can also do a small rolloff because you'll see gain of about 3-4 dB per octave when the frequency is going down. Also, include Le in your simulation if you can.
__________________
DIYaudio for President ! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Thanks for the tip!
I ran another model with the driver's published Le and it bumped the output by about 1dB from 40-120 Hz. I also updated my graphs on my webpage to show predictions with and without the EQ. Is anyone able to tell me what that huge impedance spike is going to do to my sub? Are there other graphs that would help analyze this design that I could provide? -NogginBoink
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
|
Impedance peak will not cause problems. It will be easier for your amplifier to drive your subwoofer in that range.
Impedance lows with severe phase shifts are worse my friend !
__________________
DIYaudio for President ! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
When the woofer operates at or near it fs the cone excursions increase dramatically causing the impedance to increase. In the case of a vented box design, this impedance peak is usually split into two smaller peaks, one above and one below the box f3. Your impedance peak of 47ohm is not unusual.
__________________
Rodd Yamashita |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I've made a number of attempts on 3 different browsers and can't get your page to load
![]() Quote:
__________________
Red Spade Audio Blog | Writer for: Hifi Zine S3 Synergy horn + 18" active woofers + T20 horn sub + B&C active surrounds + Custom Acoustic Treatment |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PP amp design , your thoughts please. | Nihilist | Tubes / Valves | 40 | 8th June 2009 06:33 PM |
| Thoughts on this 807 design | thevoice | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 20th November 2005 08:26 AM |
| First GC design. Any thoughts? | DC Dave | Chip Amps | 7 | 5th February 2004 04:26 AM |
| Thoughts on My Speaker Design | Street | Multi-Way | 16 | 25th July 2003 07:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |