|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Ok, so I've got a driver, and I've looked at Martin King's TL alignment tables. It's a cheapo driver, and I don't know all its parameters. The ones I do know:
Sensitivity: 90dB Qts: 0.27 Vas: 4.20 Fs: 26 I know these parameters are limited, but that's what I get for buying cheapy £18 woofers. The geometry of the line I've chosen, according to the alignment tables yeilds a tuning of about 25Hz Sl/So: 0.333 Line length: 106.8 inches The problem is I don't know what the response will be like, and according to the document it says that drivers with a lowish Qts will have a peaky responce in a TL and the remedy is to tune it 5-10Hz higher. Is it worth doing this, and if so, will I lose any low end response? OR, is it worth keeping the tuning to the Fs of my driver? Thanks for reading |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
For my records, what make/model driver is this? Listed on a website? Overall diameter, any other details? Yes, without some series resistance to 'fill' the cab/flatten out the response (lowering efficiency as the trade-off) it will indeed be 'peaky', with no real LF output. With this low a Qts, it's basically a midbass driver if no series resistance is used, so tuning it up around 3*Fs would be 'best' and forget getting any real LF out of it. If lowered efficiency is OK, then design based on whatever Qp you want, such as 0.5, and add series R as required once built to flatten it in-room. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
It's an MCM driver, model 55-1480. It's a 10" driver and marketed as a woofer
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
I might try these woofers in a wicked one enclosure
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
Historically, house brand MCM published specs are for whatever reason completely bogus, so without measuring them there's no telling what an optimum cab would be, so what most folks use to do back before measuring drivers became 'de riguer' was to put them in the largest acceptable box and tune them somewhere around 40 Hz since back then there were few tapes/records with content below it, using some form of EQ to balance out the response if too bass shy (overdamped) or 'boomy' (underdamped) in -room. Hardly optimum, yet they always got the job done. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Why must it be so hard to get decent cheap woofers in the UK!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Generally it pays to spend a little more than £18 but it doesn't have to be silly money. There are some good woofers around the £40-50 price mark here in the UK. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Measuring Freq response at home? | doctor_vine | Full Range | 4 | 31st January 2008 07:15 AM |
| amp freq response with o-scope | n0plb | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 2nd June 2005 07:40 PM |
| Overall freq. response *that* bad? | Onvinyl | Analogue Source | 7 | 13th April 2005 06:27 PM |
| Do this amp gives the freq response to 100khz? | diysmartdeep21 | Solid State | 7 | 11th February 2005 08:01 PM |
| how to measure freq response | skyraider | Solid State | 23 | 20th January 2004 07:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11475 seconds (70.39% PHP - 29.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |