Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st July 2005, 07:41 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Default PR enclosure question

I am trying to shrink my box size as much as possible while still allowing for good HT performance. I do mostly music listening anymore these days, but when I watch a movie, I want it to be how I remember it. I've been using a Blueprint 1503 in a 5.3 cubic foot vented enclosure tuned to ~20Hz. I recently sealed this enclosure up and stuffed it with a couple of pounds of polyfill, which helped with music performance. HT performance is still good, but I am afraid of driving the woofer to its limits.

So, I've been thinking about building (or having built) a PR box. I've modeled in UniBox and found that even as small as 90 liters looks good with two Stryke PR15-1050's in it (they are still on sale for $45 each, and money is tight for this project). It looks like the tuning frequency will be around 22Hz, which seems high, but looks ok in the model.

I was wondering, though, if two 15" PR's would be adequate for this woofer? Isn't the general rule for PR displacement to be twice driver displacement? In this case, it should be ok. Have I missed something as usual? Will it still sound ok for music if I line the walls (my biggest complaint before was that it was sluggish for music)?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2005, 09:57 PM   #2
ejn327 is offline ejn327  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West MI
I've got a 90 liter box with dual 1400 g PR's and the AE AV12 woofer.
Running a 20 Hz sine wave I can get the PR's to bottom out at about 110 dB
Watching movies and music though I haven't found their limits.

Not sure if it would help at all but if you added some mass to the PR's it should lower the box frequency. (I too bought the 1050 g PR's on sale and then cut and weighed some MDF blocks and glued them to the back side of the PR's to add weight http://www.aespeakers.com/phpbb2/mod...view_photo.php)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2005, 10:08 PM   #3
ejn327 is offline ejn327  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West MI
I've got a 90 liter box with dual 1400 g PR's and the AE AV12 woofer.
Running a 20 Hz sine wave I can get the PR's to bottom out at about 110 dB
Watching movies and music though I haven't found their limits.

Not sure if it would help at all but if you added some mass to the PR's it should lower the box frequency. (I too bought the 1050 g PR's on sale and then cut and weighed some MDF blocks and glued them to the back side of the PR's to add weight http://www.aespeakers.com/phpbb2/mod...view_photo.php)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2005, 12:17 AM   #4
Vikash is offline Vikash  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Vikash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Default Re: PR enclosure question

Quote:
Originally posted by needtubes
...I've modeled in UniBox and found that even as small as 90 liters looks good with two Stryke PR15-1050's in it...

I was wondering, though, if two 15" PR's would be adequate for this woofer? Isn't the general rule for PR displacement to be twice driver displacement?
Forget rule of thumb, you can see if your PR's are adequate in Unibox. The PR graph shows excursion vs power for the PR's IIRC.
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2005, 01:28 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Send a message via AIM to johninCR Send a message via MSN to johninCR Send a message via Yahoo to johninCR
PR bass will be essentially the same as you had with ported before. A superior option for dual use is ported for HT and stuff the port(s) for music. Hopefully you only covered the ports you had, so it would be a zero cost option since finances are tight. Why spend the $90 on the PR's and go back to the same sluggish sound you had before for music and lose the flexibility of being able to stuff the ports? You can fit it in a smaller box, but that's about it.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enclosure question Ben M. Subwoofers 7 19th February 2006 09:05 PM
Sub enclosure Question (s) Safe_Cracker Car Audio 6 14th January 2006 04:02 AM
TL Enclosure question CH2 Multi-Way 0 23rd April 2004 03:21 AM
Enclosure question kderedwolf Parts 1 9th October 2003 05:54 AM
GC enclosure idea and question: GrahamnDodder Chip Amps 5 28th July 2003 12:36 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Page generated in 0.09535 seconds (73.59% PHP - 26.41% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio