Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th June 2005, 09:58 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Bill Fitzpatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
Well, I see several areas worthy of investigation.

1. You don't really have a closed box. You have a closed end line with insufficient stuffing. That's going to cause response irregularities in the frequency range where "wooly" might be applicable. And, with the back just screwed on, it looks like it might be very leaky.

2. You are crossing to close to the natural roll-off of the ribbon. That's destroying the LR slopes you thought you had.

3. I'd want to look at the effect of summing the LP outputs of the crossover as you are doing. Marchand does say 10K minimum load but I'd bet a boatload of bananas the curve isn't ideal.

4. The box size you are using is to small. That woofer calls for a larger box for a more reasonable Q.

I'd start with a 160L box and if you need those dimension ratios, I'd mount the woofer in the center.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2005, 07:35 AM   #12
dan _s is offline dan _s  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
dan _s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: israel
the box is "supposed" to be sealed. in the drawing is how the back is attached to the side. i added an extra frame around the rear side in the inside of the side walls after i took the above photo.
the roll off of the ribbons and woofer box volume are within the recommended, and the responses of the XO are nice LR slopes

but then again, if it does not sound good, all those things are worth rechecking

other things to be concidered are leakage from around the driver, the LP frequency. a bad driver unit?
Attached Images
File Type: gif transverse secr.gif (2.8 KB, 137 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2005, 04:55 AM   #13
dan _s is offline dan _s  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
dan _s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: israel
i got different suggestions for several people (who were kind enough to help) so i asked Bill Bush, who designed the driver. he suggested this:
lower box volume to 70-80 liters
lower XO closer to 100Hz or add another driver
amplification to the woofer should be at least 100w. 200w is recommended. double that if i use two drivers
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: NHT1259 driver, brand new Bing Yang Swap Meet 1 11th August 2007 03:12 PM
NHT1259 response carlmart Subwoofers 4 26th August 2005 12:55 AM
subwoofer - DPL12 vs. NHT1259 smithsonga Subwoofers 3 21st January 2004 10:26 PM
NHT1259 driver Dennis Hui Multi-Way 2 10th November 2002 06:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.09526 seconds (61.78% PHP - 38.22% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio