Dual coil drivers - parameter conversion - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th May 2005, 10:06 AM   #1
Collo is offline Collo  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Collo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Collo
Default Dual coil drivers - parameter conversion

I'm currently comparing drivers from the catalog of an Aussie components supplier. Some drivers are dual voice coil units, but for most of them they dont give specs for the three possible configurations (single coil / both in series / both in parallel)

Has anyone discovered a "rule of thumb" that allows you to convert parameters. Most stay the same, but the following change:
impedence and power handling - OK I can work those out
sensitivity, Qms, Qes, Qts - all affect the design

I know some drivers are rated for resistive braking by loading one coil with a resistor or short, but those drivers generally publish their figures.

I would also like peoples opinions on the wisdom or not of putting my recommended designs for Home Theatre for each driver on my website. I don't want to get sued.

Thanks,
Collo
__________________
Ports rule!
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2005, 02:18 PM   #2
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Specs are almost always for the parallel-coil config:

Bl doubles for a series coil arrangement, but Re quadruples, so specs are the same series or parallel - except that voltage sensitivity is 6dB less for the series case than for the parallel case

Bl stays the same for a single coil as for a parallel coil, and Re doubles so Qes is double, Qms stays the same and Qts is calculated from Qes and Qms. Voltage sensitivity is also -6dB from parallel case....
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2005, 09:52 AM   #3
Collo is offline Collo  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Collo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Collo
thanks Ron...

any rules for the sensitivity expressed as 1watt@1m as opposed to the voltage sensitivity of 2.83v into 8 ohms @ 1m?

From the sample I came across it seems that parallel connection was 1.5dB greater than single coil, and series connection was 3dB greater than single coil.

Collo
__________________
Ports rule!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2005, 03:56 PM   #4
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Voltage sensitivity (2.83V) and "power sensitivity" (1Watt into Re, the DC resistance of the coil) are different by 10*log(8/Re)

1W/1m specs are useless IMO, because your amp doesn't really output watts, it is an approximate constant voltage device. When comparing sensitivity figures for building a system you should always use the 2.83V figure. The 1W figure is too subject to interpretation.

1W/1m spec - "Power available efficiency" from Beranek is the quantity inside the log below. Taking the log and adding 112.2 gives halfspace sensitivity at 1W into Re.

dB=112.2+10*log(9.614e-10*fs^3*Vas/Qes) [Vas in liters]

for the 2.83V spec you simply add 10*log(8/Re) to that.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 04:18 AM   #5
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
I want to add my 2c here hehe!

It's true that an amplifier is a voltage source, but it's so easy to get a high dB rating at 2.83V RMS if you got a coil with very low impedance, that's why I prefer the 1W/1m rating, power in for SPL output.

One 80W amplifier rated at 1 ohm will get the same SPL with a 99 dB/2.83V RMS 1 ohm speaker compared with a 80W amplifier rated at 8 ohms with a 90 dB/2.83V RMS 8 ohms speaker.

Both will play at 109 dB SPL.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 06:12 AM   #6
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Quote:
Originally posted by simon5
I want to add my 2c here hehe!

It's true that an amplifier is a voltage source, but it's so easy to get a high dB rating at 2.83V RMS if you got a coil with very low impedance, that's why I prefer the 1W/1m rating, power in for SPL output.

One 80W amplifier rated at 1 ohm will get the same SPL with a 99 dB/2.83V RMS 1 ohm speaker compared with a 80W amplifier rated at 8 ohms with a 90 dB/2.83V RMS 8 ohms speaker.

Both will play at 109 dB SPL.
Yet most amplifiers are rated at either 8 or 4 ohms so your example is a straw man. What if your speaker Re is 2.3 ohms and you don't have a 2.3 ohm rating - do you use the 4 ohm rating for your amplifier?

You can think of the 2.83V rating as cheating, but it is less ambiguous than 1W - frequently when mfg rate their driver at 1W they mean 2.83V anyway. There is no way to be sure what "watt" they are talking about unless you go through the calculations. I always calculate the sensitivity myself.

Thus for me, for calculation and comparison purposes it is easiest and least ambiguous is to use the voltage sensitivity calculated with the formulas. There are other reasons why using voltage is more convenient, like when calculating excursion in a program or when matching two drivers for sensitivity which have different DC resistances.

If you plugged the two drivers into the same amp with the same volume control setting, the 99db/2.83V driver would play 9dB louder than the 90dB/2.83V rated one. If you were using the two in the same system, it might be nice to know about that discrepancy.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 06:26 AM   #7
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
Quote:
If you plugged the two drivers into the same amp with the same volume control setting, the 99db/2.83V driver would play 9dB louder than the 90dB/2.83V rated one. If you were using the two in the same system, it might be nice to know about that discrepancy.
True, under a certain threshold the 99 dB/2.83V driver will be 9 dB louder, but the maximum SPL achievable will still be the same because the amplifier will clip early with the 99 dB/2.83V driver.

2.3 ohms DC is a bit rare... I would use three drivers to get this to 6.9, so then I use a 8 ohms rated amplifier.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 07:24 AM   #8
Collo is offline Collo  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Collo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Collo
Thanks again guys!

The reason I'm chasing the Power sensitivity rather than the voltage sensitivity is that I want to model the drivers using WinISD and it likes the former measure


RonE, I'm almost there; at the risk of incurring mathematics burnout, let me follow your equations longhand:


for Power sensitivity:

dB=112.2+10*log(9.614e-10*fs^3*Vas/Qes)

For both series and parallel conections Qes is half that of a single coil connection (or so I have been led to believe)

so the equation becomes:

dB=112.2+10*log((9.614e-10*fs^3*Vas/Qes)*2)

which simplies to:

dB=112.2+10*log((9.614e-10*fs^3*Vas/Qes)*2)+ 10*log(2)

thence to

dB=value for single coil connection + 3 dB
------------------------------------------


as a check, do the conversion to 2.83v spec using a pair of 4ohm coils

add 10*log(8/Re) to the Power sensitivity figures


series case (total Re 8ohms)
-----------

dB = (value for single coil connection + 3 dB ) + 10*log(8/Re)

dB = (value for single coil connection + 3 dB ) + 10*log(8/8)

dB = value for single coil connection + 3 dB


Parallel case (total Re 2ohms)
-------------

dB = (value for single coil connection + 3 dB ) + 10*log(8/Re)

dB = (value for single coil connection + 3 dB ) + 10*log(8/2)

dB = (value for single coil connection + 3 dB ) + 6

dB = value for single coil connection + 9 dB

To summarise
------------

"Power" sensitivity SPL 1watt@1m

series sensitivity = single coil sensitivity + 3dB
parallel sensitivity = single coil sensitivity + 3dB

Voltage sensitivity 2.83v@8ohm@1m

series sensitivity = single coil sensitivity + 3dB
parallel sensitivity = single coil sensitivity + 9dB


which contradicts your earlier figures for voltage sensitivity of
series equal to single and
parallel 6dB more than single

I seem to have picked up 3dB too much somewhere. Is it related to the "half space"?

although my head is spinning, I do appreciate the help!

regards, Collo
__________________
Ports rule!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 10:07 AM   #9
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
He never said that series was equal to single coil if I'm reading correctly.

You've calculated correctly.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 02:36 PM   #10
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
something seems a little weird. I'll look further tonite...
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual Voice Coil or Single - Sub kdhorne73 Car Audio 21 19th February 2009 08:35 AM
Dual Voice Coil Parameter Adjustments BlueWizard Multi-Way 10 10th August 2008 06:49 PM
parameter conversion memphissound Multi-Way 1 28th July 2008 07:49 PM
Dual Coil relays...how do they work ? redrabbit Solid State 0 3rd October 2007 02:27 PM
Which dual opamps should I try for I/V conversion? homemade Digital Source 11 6th October 2006 08:26 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2