Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd April 2005, 08:03 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default Passive Radiator Placement

I will be building a sub using the new Peerless XXLS and the XLS Passive radiator. How should I design the box to casue the least amount of cancelation between the Sub and the Slave. All the pictures in programs seem to show them on the same face but I would think this would casue the most cancelation due to alternating directions of tavel. I was thinking of having them on apposing sides or on adjacent sides. Any merits to one or the other. Also the 33 liter box sugested in the engineering notes seems a little small could I go up to 44 liters or would I casue some unforseen problem? Lastly are the Peerless Slaves still able to have mass added?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2005, 05:29 PM   #2
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Default Re: Passive Radiator Placement

Quote:
Originally posted by mp006ltk
I would think this would casue the most cancelation due to alternating directions of tavel.
IT doesn't matter how you put them on the baffle, there will be no difference in response - no cancellation effects unless they are widely separated (as in 5-10 feet).. BTW there is an inherent cancellation at the PR resonance that you can do nothing about, but not to worry, this is usually well below the frequencies where the sub is making any sound anyway...

The only thing you have to worry about with PR's is vibration when the PR's are very heavy. When you have a kilogram swinging back and forth a centimeter or so 30 times per second you can actually have the cabinet walk across the floor. Putting the sub on wheels is therefore not usually a good idea unless the wheels have locks.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2005, 09:13 PM   #3
sek is offline sek  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Berlin
Hi,

the Peerless application note calls for the 400g PR model in order to achieve the advertised response.

My PR has a mounting hole to add a bolt (in order to bolt on weights), but it's not required. 33l seems okay, too. I've built mine (using the XLS10 driver) with even a little lower volume.

But increasing it too much could lead to the PR bottoming out (due to too low resonant damping), and you don't want that (>400g hitting the suspension 30 times per second). Also, it might sound boomier than at 33l, and you don't want that, too (as it already isn't the most precise configuration).

Sebastian.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2005, 12:03 AM   #4
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
You can also model the enclosure yourself in WinISD Pro. I'm quite sure you can go to 44 liters, but you should look in WinISD to see what it will look like, and to know how much mass you must add to the passive radiator.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2005, 05:31 PM   #5
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
The passive radiator does not simply move out of phase with the output of the active driver, as you think. Instead, it behaves like the column of air in a reflex port. What is not important is what direction the drivers are facing, since the cones are too small for the driver to be a velocity source. What is important is the net pressure differential, since at frequencies where the wavelength is greater than the driver diameter, the driver functions as what is called a "pressure source". That is why net displacement is so important for bass drivers and not so important for high frequency drivers. The bass you hear is coming from the driver pressurizing the air around you. The passive radiator tunes the enclosure. It does not simply track the motion of the active driver but in reverse phase, but at certain frequencies the passive radiator is designed to contribute to the output, so it must be moving in phase with the active driver at this frequency, and "bouncing" on the air mass inside the box, which behaves like a spring. This is because of that "net pressure differential" thing.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passive radiator Chris8sirhC Subwoofers 4 5th August 2008 06:49 PM
Passive radiator jamikl Subwoofers 1 3rd June 2006 10:23 AM
Passive Radiator Fazorcat Subwoofers 42 10th May 2006 08:05 PM
Passive Radiator For ESS qdoc Multi-Way 0 8th July 2004 06:06 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Page generated in 0.12198 seconds (59.64% PHP - 40.36% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio