|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
|
After reading this(below link) should we put less stress on subs and loudspeakers that deliver purly flat response?
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/...gAmplitude.php |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
|
To achieve a realistic sound field, we must have flat response.
Our ears are not linear, but if the speakers are not linear, then they will hide the unlinearity of our ears. Linear is the way it's meant to be played...
__________________
DIYaudio for President ! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Ever notice that people always seem to make their EQ in a U shape - this is partially due to loudness issues and partially due to the distortion from cheap midranges ![]() Some canny loudspeaker manufacturers develop speakers with a "designed in" loudness contour that sounds impressive in the showroom .....
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
|
I might as well post part 2.
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/...eDistortio.php |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Is music already mixed with a loudness contour built in?
besides i prefer the sound of my system when the levels are EQed as close to flat as possible
__________________
CREEEAAAAAMMMMM CHEEEEEESSSSSSEEEEEEE!!!!! EEEEESSSSEEEEEEHC MMMMMAAAAAEEEERRCCC!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I once and a while get together some of the best equipment that I have built for clients over the years and we listen to music for an evening. Pop is always the first thing in. We are talking about a system with Bi amping and an agregate power of around 1200 watts / chanel. They all go whats up? It sounds terrible! They end up listening to my stuff. Big orchestral and Pipe Organ show pieces and come off the night with " I've never heard anything like that before." Rock can and is reorded well. It is just harder to find the recordings of it. A system that is truly flat into the bass regions is hard to come by. And a flat response is what we all try to achieve. When you hear it you are definitely hooked. Mark
__________________
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
The two main conclusions from the Fletcher-Munson curves are:
1). There is only one correct SPL value for sound reproduction in order to be perceived correctly. 2.) Since the audibility threshold in the bass range is frequency dependant, it is wise to take the right decision concerning the lower cutoff frequency for a given Vd. It doesn't make sense to EQ a tiny speaker flat down to 20 Hz if it can't reproduce it loudly enough to be heard while sacrificing SPL headroom at the same time by doing that. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
hehee flatness isnt a problem for me right now
i own energy c-1s which are (according to the website) flat from 60 something hz to 24khz (IIRC), and my atlas 15(when sealed) is flat down to 19hz in my room(ported gives me a hump from 40hz down to 20hz peaking by +2db average at 25 hz, and is down 3db from 40hz at 16hz) i noticed that with alot of cds, when listening at high volumes i gotta EQ some of the treble out or else theres just way to much treble, but with my remastered DSOTM and ummagumma sudio album, they both go at high volumes without painfully peaky treble. also my dad gave my system a listen with some jazz cd, i cant remember which one, but we were listening at 85db and it sounded really good(better than my system usually does). But back to the original topic, i stumbles upon this article recently http://www.digido.com/portal/pmodule...er_page_id=93/
__________________
CREEEAAAAAMMMMM CHEEEEEESSSSSSEEEEEEE!!!!! EEEEESSSSEEEEEEHC MMMMMAAAAAEEEERRCCC!!!! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sensitivity of human hearing | retroman | Multi-Way | 49 | 7th July 2009 11:31 PM |
| Distortion of human hearing | PMA | Everything Else | 44 | 23rd April 2008 12:21 AM |
| Harmonics above 20Khz - "Hi-Fi" and the limits of human hearing | percy | Everything Else | 62 | 12th March 2008 06:27 PM |
| Human Hearing................. | Gavinator68 | Everything Else | 25 | 26th January 2006 03:15 AM |
| human hearing | sss | Solid State | 123 | 8th September 2003 08:57 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.18794 seconds (60.13% PHP - 39.87% MySQL) with 10 queries |