my first sub.

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
hi i need help. im 17 years old from denmark i want to build my first subwoofer, but i need advice. first of all i have 2 peerless xls 10" woofers that i got cheep from a friend for about 180 english pounds. they are all new and in boxes.
but how should i build it? sealed? vented? i dont know.
and how big a cabbinet? what is the best option?
i thought about using a thommesen Proteus 2.5 amp. is that a good idea?

thanks. henrik from denmark.
 
Well you have yo ask yourself what you want. First you have to find a place you are willing to give up to your subwoofer. Placement is a big issue. Though (for the most part) bass frequincies can not be oriented as to where they came from inside an enclosed room Corner placement will give large boomy bass, center of a bountry will genrally give the flattest curve in the center of the room and as close to the center of the room as possible will generally give the flattest overall responce.

3/4" (around 2cm) MDF (Mid-Density-Fiberbooard) is generally the cheapest and easyest to construct with. it works great because of its high density compared to most other sheet woods. Above that Marien Grade Plywood would be the choice. but it is expensive, a pain to work with, and lb to lb doesnt offer that great of an improvement over MDF. Also Hardwood can be used since i am asumeing this is going to be used as a home audio subwoofer, and since in most houses (most) tempature and humidity stay relatively flat so warping shoudlnt be a problem; and hard wood is the most dense that i know of personally (if you dont know what hard wood is it is sheets of solid wood such as oak or cypress. Plywood is made up of thin sheets glued togather, they are not the same. on top of that most plywood here in america is White slash pine, not the most dense of woods. Marine grade is good because it will not warp and is fairly dense compared to regular plywood).

Generally Ported is the best way to go. It can give the flattest low end extension (with low tuning) or the largest SPL peaks (with high tuning). It will always be louder than sealed all other things being the same above the enclosures tuning. Some say ported is too boomy or they can hear the port making noise. if it is properly constructed the SQ is compareable to that of a sealed enclosure. Proper port area is the key to keeping that "windy" noise away and rounding off all sharp edges inside the enclosure and especailly around the port (where airflow is most prevelant) will keep away any whistles.

There are dozens of how to's on the net, search around. JLaudio.com has the formula for port tuning, or if you are to lazy Audiobahn.com has a suprisingly accurate port calulator. all you have to do is enter in what type of port you are using, what the net displacement of the enclsorue is, what tuning you want and what the port area is and it tells you how long to make the port.
 
for a first project, imo building a closed sub would be the best way to go. closed subwoofers are easiest to build, and not as critical in calculations as a ported sub.
although ported subs do usually go louder and a bit deeper, ported designs will give you a more linear inroom output (the low-order roll-off is equalized by the effect the room has on deep bass).

simon suggests building your sub as big as possible. if your main target is to build a musical sounding sub, he is right. Building a smaller sub will give your sub a more boomy sound, with more ouput over a smaller bandwidth. some find this nice for movies.

good luck with those 2 nice drivers!

(also check diysubwoofers.com)
 
In a nutshell, the low Qts of the XLS10 (home version) combined with fairly small Vas means that if you use a sealed box you are getting into very low Qtc but also F3 is relatively high. If you go for an assisted design then you will not be able to accomodate the vent because the box is too small. As you increase box size to try and accomodate the vent or just for fun, the response becomes very droopy, power handling and step response is worsened. They need a passive radiator.
 
No, designing a sealed box doesn't need extreme caution. It needs a bit of caution if you are after a certain type of FR curve.

Designing a vented box need more caution, but it's not THAT hard.

If you were designing a 6th order bandpass, then you need extreme caution.
 
No drive unit is really any 'harder' to design with than any other. It's just that as with any drive unit you have to be mindful of the application which it may or may not be suited to. You can't force it to do something it's not supposed to.

That Dali driver looks OK. It should perform quite well in a reasonably compact vented box, or a small sealed box with some EQ. The voice coils are not an issue simply connect them in series for a 4 ohm load.
 
Frg = 344 / (longest dimension / 2)
assuming metres

The theory assumes a fairly well sealed room and is the transistion between waveform reproduction and room pressurisation. I've seen curves bandied about from 6dB/oct to 12dB/oct boost. I've also seen a generic model that the curve begins at around 100Hz and rises up to give 10dB gain @ 20Hz.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.