Xmax - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th November 2004, 06:46 PM   #1
mik is offline mik
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Serbia
Default Xmax

Maximum cone displacement and Xmax are the same thing or not?
Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2004, 06:52 PM   #2
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
No, Xmax is maximum linear displacement and smaller than maximum displacement, this is more a mechanical thing.
__________________
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2004, 07:01 PM   #3
mik is offline mik
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Serbia
Thanks pinkmouse, I was looking some Visaton drivers suitable for subwoofer but they not have listed Xmax but only maximum cone displacement,
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2004, 07:18 AM   #4
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi, a rough estimate of xmax is half the difference between the coil length and magnetic gap height. xmax=(coil - gap)/2 for overhung. Underhung is quite rare I think. Each manufacturer will have different ways of calculating and/or measuring xmax.
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2004, 07:44 AM   #5
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Maximum Cone displacement very often refers to the volume of air the cone moves. It is usually written as Vd.

It is equal to Cone Area times Cone Excursion.

The difference, of course, is that if the spec means volume, the numbers will be high and be given in cu cm, cu meters or cubic inches. If they are talking about excursion, the specs will be given in mm, cm or inches.

Very often, the linear excursion is given as Xmax. The maximum excursion the cone can travel without damage is often given as Xmech.

In hi fi speakers, Xmech is often 1.5 to 2 times the Xmax. In PA speakers, Xmech is often 3 or 4 times Xmax.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2004, 02:16 PM   #6
mik is offline mik
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Serbia
Quote:
Originally posted by kelticwizard
If they are talking about excursion, the specs will be given in mm, cm or inches.


Than we talking about excursion because specs are given in cm.
http://www.visaton.de/english/artikel/art_476_1_19.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2004, 09:17 PM   #7
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
The Visaton TIW 200 XS should be a good sub driver. It has plenty of mechanical and linear excursion and should stand up to plenty of punishment. I only wish it were available here in the US. The TIW 250 XS would be even better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2004, 05:36 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Luke (Uof Iowa)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Iowa City
28 mm seems pretty high for that driver, I'm guessing that is a two-way number so Xmax would be 14 mm. But that's only a guess, they're using ambiguous terms.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2004, 07:13 AM   #9
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
I think that 28mm is mech peak to peak. i.e. mechanical damage limit.
xmax is more likely to be in the range 2mm to 6mm. But I could be wrong.
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2004, 01:53 AM   #10
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
The linear throw of this unit is not especially long. Here are the specs:
Rated power 150 Watt
Maximum power 200 Watt
Nominal impedance 4 Ohm
Frequency response (-10 dB) fu - 4200 Hz
(fu: Lower cut-off frequency depending on cabinet) .
Mean sound pressure level 92 dB (1W/1m)
Maximum cone displacement 28 mm
Resonance frequency fs 22 Hz
Magnetic induction 1,1 Tesla
Magnetic flux 1400 Weber
Height of front pole-plate 8 mm
Voice coil diameter 5 cm
Height of winding 1,85 cm
Cutout diameter 28 cm
Net weight 4,5 kg
D.C. resistance Rdc 3,6 Ohm
Mechanical Q factor Qms 1,78
Electrical Q factor Qes 0,34
Total Q factor Qts 0,29
Equivalent volume Vas 310 l
Effective piston area Sd 507 cm2
Dynamically moved mass Mms 62 g
Force factor Bxl 8,4 T m
Inductance of the voice coil L 1,1 mH



I do believe "the gap", which is given in Andrew's formula, is called the "Height of front pole-plate" here. It is 8 mm.

The length of the voice coil is 18.5 mm, (1.85 cm).

So, following Andrew's formula, the linear excursion is (18.5 - 8) / 2 = (10.5) / 2 = 5.5 mm. Which is barely normal for this size woofer.

It does seem to have an Xmech of about 3 times the linear Xmax, and a higher than normal sensitivity, (92 dB).

Hi fi woofers tend to have longer Xmax but lower sensitivity, and their Xmech is generally not more than twice their linear Xmax.

PA speakers tend to have higher sensitivities, (about 95 db), and have Xmech about 3 times the Xmax, which this is.

So this seems to be a cross between a PA driver and a HiFi driver. I am guessing it's primary purpose would be for a high efficiency, (for a HiFi) speaker, and not a PA speaker. But it does seem to share some qualities with a PA driver.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
xmax on unibox BNK Multi-Way 2 10th November 2008 06:31 PM
Question about xmax mitchyz250f Subwoofers 12 2nd August 2008 08:02 PM
Wrms, FS or xmax onform Subwoofers 4 24th June 2008 07:09 PM
Xmax dallaire Multi-Way 2 25th December 2007 09:47 AM
Determining The XMAX OMNIFEX Multi-Way 11 8th August 2004 06:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2