I think I am down for eight of these:
Creative Sound Solutions | High End Speakers and Speaker Kits
Any naysayers?
TIA,
Vince
Creative Sound Solutions | High End Speakers and Speaker Kits
Any naysayers?
TIA,
Vince
I see that your T/S parameter data sets are incomplete, missing efficiency and surface area data (and others). I was going to suggest that you also compare SPL, not just gain. There should be a significant difference apparent between the two systems (26l vs 85l).
Do try simming in Unibox, as recommended earlier.
Do try simming in Unibox, as recommended earlier.
I wonder how those CSS subwoofers compare against the Type R 10s?
See Alpine Type-R SWR-10D4 3000W Peak 10" Type-R Series Dual 4-Ohm High Performance Subwoofer
Xmax for the Type R 10s is significantly greater.
See Alpine Type-R SWR-10D4 3000W Peak 10" Type-R Series Dual 4-Ohm High Performance Subwoofer
Xmax for the Type R 10s is significantly greater.
Ah, I misread the information page about the CSS driver. I thought it said Xmax was 12.7mm. It's actually saying that BL is flat for an Xmax of 12.7mm
The Type-R drivers feature pretty flat BL curves as well, but the CSS driver seems significantly more efficient, and likely worth the few extra $$
They are fairly efficient needing rather large boxes for 10" woofers. They also play just about as low as anything in a ported box modeling lower than most 12" drivers IMO. Now that I sealed the ports and using a shelving EQ to compensate for the lost low end vs ported, I am enjoying them even more. I am running them with about 150W each in 2.2 cu ft sealed right now. Running 4 of them and find they sound pretty good even XO'd as far up as 200hz with a 24dB/oct crossover. I run them up to 150hz now.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.