New sub design? Constricted Transflex, simple build (series tuned 6th order) - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd July 2014, 12:19 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Matthew Morgan J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Arizona
Default New sub design? Constricted Transflex, simple build (series tuned 6th order)

It is affordable, is extremely simple to build, small, and according to HR simulations the output looks very respectable. Group delay and excursion also look reasonable with the $50 SWE-10S4 drivers that i used in the sims.. .

Tinkering around with Hornresponse a while back i came up with this design... I never built one (and i probably never will because i have already moved on to other ideas that i want to pursue) but i thought i would post this on DIYaudio to see if anyone finds it interesting or useful .. I was also curious to see what the big-brained subwoofer gurus had to say, be it good or bad ..

I refer to it as a constricted transflex, but its like a tapped horn that is squeezed down in the middle, and it is also like a pipe-resonance mode based (instead of helmholtz mode) series tuned 6th order bandpass box ..
The drivers need to have an FS close to FB, along with tight suspensions and strong motors to work properly in this box...

I found two different ways of simulating it in HR, one utilizes the compression chamber function, and the other doesn't , but as far as i can tell both sim methods are valid and produce a very similar response and output ... I will post both sets of HR inputs.

As you can see one of the drivers can be physically mounted in reverse and the phase flipped to make this a push-pull (actually push-push right?) to cancel some distortion.. I know the "PP" feature has been something that some folks on this site have been using lately in other designs, so call me trendy ...

According to sims two of these cabinets (combined total of 200 liters) can handle 1000 watts without pushing the 10S4 drivers past their excursion ratings of 10mm one way, and output should be just under 130db with solid response all the way down to 40hz in halfspace .. Seems great for 2 small boxes that could be built in less than a day, using only 200 dollars worth of drivers total !

In a car or a truck (1/8th space or .5pi) the output is pretty obscene with one cabinet making 135db with only 500 watts input power , but of course only down to 40hz which is fine for much music but not all (depends on your personal preferences right?)

I didn't show any cabinet bracing in the sketch but its easy enough to improvise those ...

The response graphs remind me of some of the old MTL-1X Manifold-horn cabinets that EV used to make for dual 18" woofers, which is not suprising because those were also series tuned 6th order bandpass boxes, only much larger ...

I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts and reading you comments regarding this design.

Last edited by Matthew Morgan J; 22nd July 2014 at 12:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 03:38 AM   #2
freddi is offline freddi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
freddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
looks like a fun-little noisemaker and its form factor like some 1-12 bandpass boxes - will similar work for Infinity's 1260W?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 04:57 AM   #3
xrk971 is offline xrk971  United States
diyAudio Member
 
xrk971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Neat idea but your horn profile doesnt match the sketch. It will expand from closed end until reaches the turn at divider where it contracts and then expands again to the mouth. Basically CON section L2 is much longer - about 3 ft or 90 cm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 05:48 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Matthew Morgan J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Arizona
Freddi, Im sure a 12" driver could work in this box, it would definitely fit, but the specs would have to be pretty tight and the FS would need to be higher than most car audio 12s ....

XRK971, I see what you mean ... For the non chambered version the contraction isn't abrupt enough, and the chambered version actually models the first section as just a pipe or a tube with an extremely abrupt constriction .... Two very different shapes for the first section but the sims produce similar results as long as the internal air space and path length of that section are the same (and if the constriction also has the same area).. It seems like the geometry of that section should be having more impact on sims, but its not for some reason ...... Having more segments to work with would allow me to make a more accurate model, maybe i could get someone to sim this in Akabak to confirm that the results are still acceptably good..
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 06:12 AM   #5
freddi is offline freddi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
freddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
that's ok - I'm game for those 10s - so the actual build would be just 14x14 (or 14.25x14.25" ) x 36" with a 3" gapped diagonal baffle - ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 07:12 AM   #6
freddi is offline freddi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
freddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
the 12" 12S4 version has 30Hz fs - how would it fare?
http://support.alpine-usa.com/produc...WA-12S4_EN.pdf

that Pioneer 10 looks nice - was one set of spec reversed? saw 1.15 as qt and 0.4-something as vas - http://www.parts-express.com/pioneer...-ohm--267-2501

Last edited by freddi; 23rd July 2014 at 07:28 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 07:25 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Matthew Morgan J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Arizona
Yessir, a 3" gap and outer dimensions of 14"x14"x36" . Those are outside dimensions, already compensated for 1/2" material .... Made with something like a good birch ply would keep it light enough to be easily carried by one person ... You could use thicker material but the outside dimensions would increase slightly... With 1/2" material you could increase to the 14.25" dimensions if you want to make up for the airspace that the internal panel takes up.. Good thinking (thats where you were going with that right?)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 07:30 AM   #8
freddi is offline freddi  United States
diyAudio Member
 
freddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
1/2" Baltic birch with holey braces should be nice - guess it might need two access panels -?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 07:33 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Matthew Morgan J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Arizona
Thar PDF you posted is for the SWA series, i was simming with the SWE series drivers ... The specs on the Alpine SWE drivers are more useful in this app ....
The SWE-12S4 is a really good value too, but with the FS being a little lower (36hz) the path length would have to be made a little longer ... I would have to adjust the sim and see how it looks (one 12 per box) .. My guess is that the maximum output would be less but the bass would extend lower, it would be more affordable, but with half the power handling since we would be using only one driver per cab instead of two ...
http://support.alpine-usa.com/produc...E-10_12_S4.pdf

Last edited by Matthew Morgan J; 23rd July 2014 at 07:38 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2014, 07:44 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Matthew Morgan J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Arizona
Yep , holed braces for sure ...at least one access panel i would imagine , two if you want , though you would have some amount of access through the mouth as well.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6th order PPSL enclosure design. lbstyling Subwoofers 17 13th December 2013 05:12 AM
6th order design check? carneoleon Subwoofers 28 29th November 2013 04:39 PM
6th order series tuned aznboi3644 Subwoofers 2 3rd September 2008 03:36 AM
6th order bandpass design - TheWacoKid Subwoofers 5 2nd August 2006 03:02 PM
6th order bandpass design? SubNut Subwoofers 3 22nd September 2001 08:48 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2