Subwoofer for closed box

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Confirming simulations here with WinISD beta 0.44 for the Scan Speak
Sealed Qtc .71, 68.9L, -3.1 DB @ 39.12 Hz.
But look at this....as the EBP is at 52.77... this splits the usage down the middle for sealed or ported.

Ported 130.2 L, Fb 22.63 Hz, F3 ? -3.06 Db@23.89 Hz, 102mm Diam, 286mm long.

The thing is, the sealed design starts a slow roll-off at 100 Hz, while the ported starts a faster roll-off at 40 Hz.
If you can cope with the larger enclosure, I would opt for the ported type.
Given that this driver has a generous 13mm of Xmax.......I would port it.

______________________________________________________Rick........
 
Last edited:
A 2 cu ft 2nd order sealed box with an F3 of 30hz can only be 0.18% efficient (84.55dB).
A 2 cu ft 4th order vented box with an F3 of 30hz can only be 0.36% efficient (87.56dB).
A 2 cu ft 6th order vented box with an F3 of 30hz can only be 0.90% efficient (91.54dB).
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.