Infra sonic subwoofer design - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th May 2013, 01:35 PM   #11
Ile is offline Ile  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jyväskylä
IB sub with few 18" should do that. Two for small room and 4 or more to bigger one. Ficar IB318 is one option for driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2013, 01:46 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
Quote:
Originally Posted by awraudio View Post
Use a rotary subwoofer and your virtual
pipe organ will sound about as real as it
gets. I couldn't be happier with this
rotary subwoofer!!!!!
How much?! (Subwoofer fan+amp) The price plays a significant role here.
What to expect? tittualex, besides the space for the architecture and interior decorations (extra rooms and space), you will need to make accommodation for the requirements for this type of project. Other experiments/simulations have been made. Use the rotary subwoofer if you can afford it. Total $21,950-$25,950.
Eminent Technology Model 17

Take as an example the discontinued Maelstrom 21" DVC by Exodus Audio. You will need a BR enclosure typically 450/500 L and amps enough to drive the driver to max Xmax, close to 4500/5000 W @4/5 Ohms (144.50 V) each. The amp needs to run in passive mode, no-fan/no-noise (Crown type) or with on/off mode (Yamaha type) for a quite environment (or place amps in the next adjoining room away from auditorium). You can expect from such setups (SPL@1.00m) 130dB with 2/3 drivers. You can very much play with frequencies 7-20Hz and will need a system that provides auto or adjustable room equalization.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2013, 07:49 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: wisconsin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inductor View Post
How much?! (Subwoofer fan+amp) The price plays a significant role here.
What to expect? tittualex, besides the space for the architecture and interior decorations (extra rooms and space), you will need to make accommodation for the requirements for this type of project. Other experiments/simulations have been made. Use the rotary subwoofer if you can afford it. Total $21,950-$25,950.
Eminent Technology Model 17

Take as an example the discontinued Maelstrom 21" DVC by Exodus Audio. You will need a BR enclosure typically 450/500 L and amps enough to drive the driver to max Xmax, close to 4500/5000 W @4/5 Ohms (144.50 V) each. The amp needs to run in passive mode, no-fan/no-noise (Crown type) or with on/off mode (Yamaha type) for a quite environment (or place amps in the next adjoining room away from auditorium). You can expect from such setups (SPL@1.00m) 130dB with 2/3 drivers. You can very much play with frequencies 7-20Hz and will need a system that provides auto or adjustable room equalization.
I built the enclosure and modified the floor opening (structural)
and the total cost was $15,000 including the amp that
pitches the blades.
The cost of $21,950 to $25,950 is for the entire project,
which Bruce Thigpen would do (construction, design,
installation and testing.

One needs a very large space for the rotary to vent into,
which I used my entire basement (a small space limits the
output somewhat, not the extension of the rotary.

The amp is designed by Marchand Electronics and is rated
at 200 watts, which is more than enough to pitch the blades
of the rotary sub. The real power comes from the 20 amp
circuit that powers the fan motor. The price was $1200. for
this amp.

It is still not cheap, but it is to me the most realistic subwoofer
that can outdo any conventional subwoofer (worth every penny).
Infra bass down to below 1 hz and transient response that
is awesome!!!! More power than one would ever need and
can handle any recording with out overdriving or destroying
the rotary sub.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0800.jpg (25.8 KB, 553 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 02:05 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: india
Thank you all, for all your comments... I will be using the sub in a room with dimn. (18'x10'x10'). rotary sub woofer is way too costly and i cant make much alterations to my room for fixing the rotary sub.

Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 03:03 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by awraudio View Post
More power than one would ever need and
can handle any recording with out overdriving or destroying
the rotary sub.
This statement is completely subjective and completely untrue. I've seen a bunch of installation pics with 2 or 3 rotary subs used in a modest living room type setup. For churches and other commercial usage I've seen many more used - the most I could find in a quick search was 6 but I've seen pics with even more used.

There's no doubt that the rotary sub is impressive but it could easily be beat by conventional drivers (in multiples) given the same budget and size limitations.

The number of subs required (rotary or conventional) has a lot to do with the room (construction, leakage and size), the desired spl and the available budget.

Here's some pics of multiple rotary subs. One domestic, one church, one commercial. (The commercial pic shows 6 subs, link to the writeup is here - Niagara Falls Fury rotary woofer installation )

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by just a guy; 15th May 2013 at 03:07 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 01:29 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: wisconsin
Quote:
Originally Posted by just a guy View Post
This statement is completely subjective and completely untrue. I've seen a bunch of installation pics with 2 or 3 rotary subs used in a modest living room type setup. For churches and other commercial usage I've seen many more used - the most I could find in a quick search was 6 but I've seen pics with even more used.

There's no doubt that the rotary sub is impressive but it could easily be beat by conventional drivers (in multiples) given the same budget and size limitations.

The number of subs required (rotary or conventional) has a lot to do with the room (construction, leakage and size), the desired spl and the available budget.

Here's some pics of multiple rotary subs. One domestic, one church, one commercial. (The commercial pic shows 6 subs, link to the writeup is here - Niagara Falls Fury rotary woofer installation )

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
Those installations, except one are commercial
installations and are huge in size requiring a lot
of subs.

Mine room is 20' wide x 30' long and I use
less than the full output of the rotary sub.

Transient response with rotary sub (below 10 hz
is one of the hardest things to get right, and the
rotary excels in this area.

I saw one installation with (eight 18" subwoofers)
with 10,000 watts of power that could equal
the rotary and surpass the output, but I am
talking about one rotary sub. No single
conventional sub can produce enough energy
below 10 hertz that can do what the rotary can
achieve, especially with only 200 watts!!

If one has the room for this many drivers,
and enough power, this would work well,
if loudness is one's only criteria.

Distortion is low with the rotary sub and
is a perfect match for my Magnepanar Tympani
IV's (coherence is superb with no apparent
colorations, which one would get with conventional
subs.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1034.jpg (27.7 KB, 96 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 05:24 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sitting behind the 'puter screen, in Illinois, USA, planet earth
Fwiw, if i am not mistaken, the venue had replaced all the fan subs at Niagara with a couple (2) big Tapped horns a few years ago.
Best,
Tom
__________________
Bring back mst3k and futurama
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 05:52 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by awraudio View Post

Mine room is 20' wide x 30' long and I use
less than the full output of the rotary sub.
Like I said, I've seen pics of 3 rotary subs used in a home theater no larger than yours. I can't find the pics right now but they are out there somewhere. Let me repeat - the number of subs required (rotary or conventional) has a lot to do with the room (construction, leakage and size), the desired spl and the available budget.

Just because you are happy with one in your room doesn't mean much to anyone else. You haven't listed any specs, room details or anything else, all you've stated is a completely subjective judgement that doesn't mean anything to anyone except you.

Quote:
I saw one installation with (eight 18" subwoofers)
with 10,000 watts of power that could equal
the rotary and surpass the output, but I am
talking about one rotary sub. No single
conventional sub can produce enough energy
below 10 hertz that can do what the rotary can
achieve, especially with only 200 watts!!

If one has the room for this many drivers,
and enough power, this would work well,
if loudness is one's only criteria.

Distortion is low with the rotary sub and
is a perfect match for my Magnepanar Tympani
IV's (coherence is superb with no apparent
colorations, which one would get with conventional
subs.
Again, let me repeat - There's no doubt that the rotary sub is impressive but it could easily be beat by conventional drivers (in multiples) given the same budget and size limitations.

I'm not sure what colorations you think conventional subs are subject to that rotary subs are immune from, but physics says they can both do the same job just fine and with low distortion. In fact, the conventional drivers won't have any fan noise to filter out (and no matter what you do you'll never completely eliminate the fan noise).

Saying that your rotary sub only uses 200 watts is not really true either. The 200 watts is only for pitching the blades, and that's not what creates the acoustic power. The fan itself creates the acoustic output and it uses a 1/3 hp motor IIRC, which runs full speed ALL THE TIME, not just when needed like conventional drivers. So if you add up all the power the rotary sub uses it will actually be more than conventional drivers would use.t

Besides, $1200 for a 200 watt amp? You can get 14000 watts rms these days for well under $1000 shipped to your door, all fees and taxes included.

Even so, it doesn't take all that much power to get a bunch of conventional drivers to hit xmax at 3 hz, I don't think you'd need anywhere near 10000 watts to beat your rotary sub with conventional drivers. I haven't run the numbers but I'm confident that I could beat your rotary sub by quite a bit (in terms of max spl, distortion and ambient noise) with conventional drivers with a fraction of budget and using no more space than you currently use. There was a time (even just a few years ago) when conventional drivers were quite expensive. But prices are falling exponentially and will continue to fall as time goes by. The rotary sub can't compete any more unless it's dramatically cheaper than it used to be.

AFAIK this is the current value leader in LF conventional drivers, and next year there will be something even cheaper.
Stereo Integrity | HT Subwoofers - 18 inch driver
Stereo Integrity | Order Online - price list

10 of those drivers and a 14000 watt amp are less than $3000 total. For the $15000 you paid you could get more than 50 of those drivers and at least 5 of the 14000 rms amps. You do the math.

Last edited by just a guy; 15th May 2013 at 06:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 10:57 PM   #19
opcom is offline opcom  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by just a guy View Post
This is true. You need to state your goals before anyone can help.



This is not true. If it was headphones wouldn't work. You don't have to fit a whole wavelength into a room to hear it.
Thank you for correcting that misconception.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2013, 11:06 PM   #20
opcom is offline opcom  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Danley View Post
Fwiw, if i am not mistaken, the venue had replaced all the fan subs at Niagara with a couple (2) big Tapped horns a few years ago.
Best,
Tom
Where was I when it was time to show up and say "here, let me haul that old junk off for you.."

Many goodies have come my way by those means.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the sonic result of this crossover design corelement Multi-Way 26 22nd August 2012 10:43 PM
Adding Subwoofer output to Sonic T-Amp HolyGhostFire20 Class D 4 23rd November 2011 07:33 PM
Help needed for Sub-sonic subwoofer design.... orangealpaca Subwoofers 52 3rd May 2008 12:23 PM
Driving a subwoofer with a sonic t-amp flashbacck Class D 3 28th January 2006 01:02 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2