F3 rating - relative to what? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th February 2013, 04:50 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Default F3 rating - relative to what?

Hello folks,

been lurking for a while and am a novice speaker builder (but I stay at the Holiday Inn Express frequently and am a quick learner).

When you have a driver rated for 25-300 Hz for example, and let's say it's flat from 60-250 Hz again just for example, I could see an argument to be made for using the peak of the flat region as a 0 db reference and simply looking for where you cross the -3db line as you approach 25 Hz.

Hoever, in a real world application (HT setup for example crossed at 80 Hz), do your need to adjust your 0 db reference? WHat if I have really nice left right front speakers and would like to cross to the sub at 40 or 60 Hz instead?

I.e. should the F3 rating only be used in context of the frequency band where you will actually be driving the sub?

Back to the real world, my first DIY project was to build an appox 3 cu ft cube subwoofer for a 12 inch well known driver. Only I had forgotten I was too cheap to actually buy the driver several years earlier and had bought a more run of the mill 10 inch driver instead on sale. A quick redo of the front side of the enclosure and I had my first working DIY speaker. My Carver TFM-15 bridged or not drives it quite well and it sounds decent enough (I've got no baseline to compare it to though).

Today, a few years later I went back into WinISD and calculated the sub has an F3 of around 80 Hz. Well, I thought I was shooting for some magical 20HZ (or at least in the low 30s). This got me thinking though about what the F3 0db reference is and whether the sub I built isn't actually "better" than the design software suggests.

As a follow-up I am in the process of redoing the sub in a ported enclosure with a target F3 of around 30 Hz.

Not trying to start a vented vs closed discussion, just looking for a check on whether or not I understand F3.

Thanks for reading
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2013, 05:53 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
F3 is generally accepted to be the point that is 3 dB down in level from the low frequency portion of a driver's response.
If the alignment is drooping in low frequency response , the F3 point would be more than 3 dB down from the upper frequency region of the pass band.
Attached Images
File Type: png F3.png (121.6 KB, 111 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2013, 08:19 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Thanks for replay. Not sure I get it 100% yet though.

Is "the low frequency portion "a fuzzy definition"?

It looks like 300 Hz is at the 0 db reference level and the F3 values are determined by that. Does that mean I should assume there is a low pass filter at 300 Hz in this example? Continuing down this path, if I had a low pass filter at 100 Hz, the F3 values would change dramatically to about 60 Hz in the low graph (assuming at 100 Hz it was about +3 db).

Am I on to something or visiting Linus n left field?
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2013, 09:04 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
In a maximally flat classic Theile Small alignment, F3 is the frequency that is 3 dB down from the flat portion.
Classic TS alignments often end up with a box size undesirably large, or a LF corner undesirably high, so one can use different alignments.

The two examples posted in post #2 are not maximally flat, the upper example shows a "bump" of about 1.5 dB above the 0 dB "flat" response point.
The lower example has a 3 dB "bump" over the 0 dB "flat" response reference.
Neither simulation use low pass filters, the upper roll off is a representation of the idealized mass rolloff, in reality the response would not look like that, there would be peaks and dips.

A sealed speaker in general rolls off at only 12 dB per octave below F3, equalization can be used to flatten response below F3, as excursion goes up relatively slowly below F3

A ported cabinet in general rolls off at 24 dB per octave, and excursion rises very rapidly, there is generally very little usable response below F3.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2013, 06:08 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
▀art West-VL.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Vlaanderen
Hibernator,
Do you mean the upper usable frequency or the -3dB low point Art is explaining?
I'm under the impression that you want to know how low you should cross your mains to the sub, correct?
Most smaller subs will play higher then the '80hz' crossover that is used a lot.
Art said it, there are peaks and dips if you cross over too high.
If your mains can produce 55hz, then cross over there, a sub is to reproduce the lower frequency's otherwise hard to play.
If your mains can't go lower then 100hz, better to use two 'stereo'-subs or at least place the sub centred.
Maybe look at the -3dB low roll-off and look for the same at the upper side, I'm not sure of this.
__________________
Break in your loudspeakers at 35% RMS power Right-click'save as...'
Brown noise mono 192kbps(hit "repeat")
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2013, 11:59 AM   #6
sreten is online now sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

If you have a very low pass yes you effectively modify F-3dB.

For vented boxes with room gain its best IMO to go for
the low tunings that optimise F-6B to F-10dB, generally.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing more practical than a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relative Humidity Attenuating HF TV7 Tubes / Valves 18 19th November 2012 11:47 AM
crossover questions for relative newcomer paul3221 Multi-Way 7 11th September 2009 12:25 AM
Relative merits of this vintage tweeter? Brisso57 Multi-Way 3 27th October 2008 11:26 AM
What do you use? Not technical but relative. hdlcx2 Tubes / Valves 11 4th August 2008 08:12 PM
Frequency response relative to volume (loudness)? Hybrid fourdoor Multi-Way 5 9th May 2004 01:31 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ę1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2