diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Subwoofers (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/subwoofers/)
-   -   Sub project for PA - Help needed (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/subwoofers/229349-sub-project-pa-help-needed.html)

Lee in Montreal 4th February 2013 08:55 PM

Sub project for PA - Help needed
 
I am asking for help simulating this bass bin as I am running on Mac and could never find any simulation software. Basically I have redesigned a sub, based on work done by Electro Voice (TL4050 using 15" woofer) and EAW (BH882 using 18" woofer), and were later modified by Richard Long as the famous Bertha. The Bertha had a 7.5 foot horn path, plus 3 foot Levan extension. I redesigned it with 10.5ft internal path, and the optional 3 feet deep extension. I intend to use JBL's 2242. What can be altered for best result is the throat area and back chamber volume. Current throat works on a 2:1 compression ratio with that 18" driver. Can anyone sim this bin and tell me how rear chamber volume and throat area can be improved?

TIA

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psf58ba03c.png

m R g S r 5th February 2013 12:05 AM

Montreal? Stereo in Montreal has some "Berthas". 4 or 5 I believe! Sound is pretty darn good there. Why not just go with the original design? Either way the sub you proposed or the Bertha are both very very large and most likely not easily transported....

Lee in Montreal 5th February 2013 12:13 AM

Party subs. I am actually doing Half Berthas with a single woofer. Being 24" high instead of 46" high, they will be easier to move through doors ;-) And yes. Stereo has 3 Berthas (used to have 6).

In regard of your question about why changing the Berthas. The answer is simple. The Bertha is itself an improved version of the EAW, which is an improved version of the Electo-Voice. Last improvement on the Bertha was done 30 years ago. Perhaps it's time to do something. Anyway, my request is to have help simulating this horn. Hornresp is PC-only as well as most simulation softwares. And I will not buy a PC or have Windows on my Mac ;-) I even searched for Excel spreadsheets and found none.

Inductor 5th February 2013 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee in Montreal (Post 3356261)
...And I will not buy a PC or have Windows on my Mac ;-) I even searched for Excel spreadsheets and found none.

Apache OpenOffice for Mac
Quote:

I intend to use JBL's 2242
Strange, how do you know this woofer is good for your application?!

Lee in Montreal 5th February 2013 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inductor (Post 3356506)
Apache OpenOffice for Mac

I don't understand how it is related to my request.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inductor (Post 3356506)
Strange, how do you know this woofer is good for your application?!

Why do you think it is not suitable? I'd be interested to hear it as so far, it is what is inside most Berthas being used in clubs. You should check the T/S parameters. They are quite good for a horn loaded cabinet.

Inductor 5th February 2013 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee in Montreal (Post 3356838)
I don't understand how it is related to my request.

Why do you think it is not suitable? I'd be interested to hear it as so far, it is what is inside most Berthas being used in clubs. You should check the T/S parameters. They are quite good for a horn loaded cabinet.

1. You said you want to use your Mac to run Excel spreadsheets or I'm wrong.
Quote:

I am running on Mac
Quote:

I will not buy a PC or have Windows on my Mac
Quote:

I even searched for Excel spreadsheets and found none.
2. It just shows in my sim an orange tag for this driver (not the best).

Lee in Montreal 5th February 2013 02:05 PM

Excel already runs on a Mac and has been for close to 30 years ;-)

Lee in Montreal 5th February 2013 02:39 PM

BTW When you mention that the 2242 is "not the best", are you refering as "not he best for home duty" or "not the best for PA". Those would be two very different requirements. The 2242 has a relatively low Qts (0.28) and a strong motor. The venting allows for great cooling. This is perhaps the best sound reinforcement woofer JBL has made in decades. And that's why it is widely used on dance floors. Both on bass reflex cabinets and horn loaded ones.

weltersys 5th February 2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee in Montreal (Post 3356261)
In regard of your question about why changing the Berthas. The answer is simple. The Bertha is itself an improved version of the EAW, which is an improved version of the Electo-Voice. Last improvement on the Bertha was done 30 years ago. Perhaps it's time to do something. Anyway, my request is to have help simulating this horn. Hornresp is PC-only as well as most simulation softwares. And I will not buy a PC or have Windows on my Mac ;-) I even searched for Excel spreadsheets and found none.

Other than the introduction of tapped horns, which can go much lower than a FLH for a given size, not much has changed in horn design in the last 30 years.

Driver design has changed, drivers with more than double the Xmax of the JBL 2242 (only 7.87mm) are available now.
Due to much greater Xmax, power handling, and BL, the B&C18TBW100 would have almost 6 dB more output than the 2242 in the Berthoid, and at $349 (in the USA) probably cheaper too.

I dislike PC computers, been on Mac since the mid 80's, but run Hornresp on an old Dell PC .
You can get an old used PCs for next to nothing, cheaper than a windoze emulater.
And no, I won't be doing your design work for you for free, but I will tell you that I have not found Hornresp to be super accurate in regards to chamber size.
If you are sold on FLH, go ahead and build, then just experiment with the chamber size on the prototype. Easily done with sand bags or foam blocks, small differences in chamber volume can make some rather large differences in smoothness and output.

Art

Lee in Montreal 5th February 2013 03:48 PM

I checked the T/S specs on the BC woofer and not much is available. All sites that sell it have the same minimal info. 96db efficiency compared to the JBL's 2242 of 99db. BC claims 35 to 1000Hz response, but doesn't say within how many db and no T/S available. JBL's claim is 25 to 1,6Khz response. I don't mean the BC is a bad driver, but I can't read any info on it. While the JBL 2242, as used in the ASH-6118WH horn loaded sub is flat to 30Hz with high efficiency.

JBL ASH-6118WH Specifications:

Frequency Range (-10 dB): 1 cabinet: 25 Hz – 250 Hz,
2 cabinets: 24 Hz – 250 Hz,
4 cabinets: 22 Hz – 250 Hz
Frequency Response (3 dB):1cabinet: 30 Hz – 200 Hz,
2 cabinets: 28 Hz – 200 Hz,
4 cabinets: 26 Hz – 200 Hz
Transducer PowerRating (AES):1 cabinet:1200 W (4800 W peak), 2 hrs,800 W (3200 W peak), 100 hrs
2 cabinets:2400 W (9600 W peak), 2 hrs 1600 W (6400 W peak), 100 hrs
4 cabinets: 4800 W (19200 W peak), 2 hrs 3200 W (12800 W peak), 100 hrs
Long-Term System Power Rating (IEC):1 cabinet: 800 W (3200 W peak), 100 hrs
2 cabinets: 1600 W (6400 W, peak), 100 hrs
4 cabinets: 3200 W (12800 W peak), 100 hrs
Maximum SPL: 30 Hz – 140 Hz:
1 cabinet: 133 dB-SPL, cont avg(139 dB peak)
2 cabinets: 138 dB-SPL cont avg(144 dB peak)
4 cabinets: 144 dB-SPL cont avg(150 dB peak)
System Sensitivity (dB-SPL, 1W @ 1m):30 Hz – 150 Hz:
1 cabinet: 102 dB
2 cabinets: 104 dB
4 cabinets: 107 dB|
Nominal Impedance:8 ohms per cabinet.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2