Lab 12 Based Offset Driver - Mass Loaded - Transmission Line (OD-ML-TL) Design by Bj

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I have not modeled Don's tapped horn, I thought about building one but it is larger than I wanted. I know it will play significantly louder and I defer to others who have heard examples of each enclusure type (OD-ML-TL vice TH) to offer opinions on sound quality differences.

I'm curious to know as well, but I'd really have to build a pair of these to compare to Don's TH. My build of Don's TH is a little different because I've got the TC Sounds driver in there. I ended up not using the series inductor. It makes the Hornresp prediction better, but in real use, it didn't change the output significantly. I ended up just measuring the room response with REW, exporting an EQ profile and loading it into the MiniDSP. Room response is pretty much ruler flat from 18hz to 80hz.

The thing I like the most about them is their efficiency. I have the subwoofer output on my HTR set at -10 and the gain knobs on the sub amp set at 1 o'clock and they'll still lift the hair off your head if you aren't careful.

I also have a pair of T-TQWT subs and several pairs of vented subs, all of which I swap around from time to time just for fun. The vented subs tend to be easier to integrate, partially because the efficiency is more in line with my main speakers (mid 80's I'd suspect), and also partially because you really don't have to worry much about delay and such. The larger of my two pairs however, really don't do much lower than about 24-26 hz.

The T-TQWT is the middle ground, decent efficiency, reasonably flat without EQ, and the delay is easy to manage with a little placement dancing. The T-TQWT wins out on "quality" I guess, they seem very strong, but also very pleasant to listen to. They're very well behaved.

Now, the TH is just a monster. It doesn't care, it says "Hey, I'm here" and it grabs you by the hair and kicks you in the chest, a bit like sitting on stage at a concert, halfway between the bassist's cab and a double drum kit. It's visceral, mean, and it'll knock the breath out of your chest if asked to.

The video in my sig was done with them.

I would suspect that the OD-ML-TL is probably somewhere between the T-TQWT and the TH, but I very much want to make a pair just to know for sure. Of course, I'd probably use the TC Sounds drivers as I'm quite, quite fond of them now.
 
Last edited:
I'm curious to know as well, but I'd really have to build a pair of these to compare to Don's TH. My build of Don's TH is a little different because I've got the TC Sounds driver in there. I ended up not using the series inductor. It makes the Hornresp prediction better, but in real use, it didn't change the output significantly. I ended up just measuring the room response with REW, exporting an EQ profile and loading it into the MiniDSP. Room response is pretty much ruler flat from 18hz to 80hz.

The thing I like the most about them is their efficiency. I have the subwoofer output on my HTR set at -10 and the gain knobs on the sub amp set at 1 o'clock and they'll still lift the hair off your head if you aren't careful.

I also have a pair of T-TQWT subs and several pairs of vented subs, all of which I swap around from time to time just for fun. The vented subs tend to be easier to integrate, partially because the efficiency is more in line with my main speakers (mid 80's I'd suspect), and also partially because you really don't have to worry much about delay and such. The larger of my two pairs however, really don't do much lower than about 24-26 hz.

The T-TQWT is the middle ground, decent efficiency, reasonably flat without EQ, and the delay is easy to manage with a little placement dancing. The T-TQWT wins out on "quality" I guess, they seem very strong, but also very pleasant to listen to. They're very well behaved.

Now, the TH is just a monster. It doesn't care, it says "Hey, I'm here" and it grabs you by the hair and kicks you in the chest, a bit like sitting on stage at a concert, halfway between the bassist's cab and a double drum kit. It's visceral, mean, and it'll knock the breath out of your chest if asked to.

The video in my sig was done with them.

I would suspect that the OD-ML-TL is probably somewhere between the T-TQWT and the TH, but I very much want to make a pair just to know for sure. Of course, I'd probably use the TC Sounds drivers as I'm quite, quite fond of them now.

Thank you for the detailed review of the different designs, it is great to hear from someone who has experience with bot TH and T-TQWT. It will be interesting to hear the Mal-X design that bjorno came up with and tb46 put into final configuration.

Those TC Sound drivers model really well in this enclosure, with the extra throw translating into higher SPL. I think I will build 4 enclosures, two for my current Lab 12s and two for TC Sound drivers. I have both an HT and a two channel setup (Magnapan MMG's) so I have a need for multiple subs.
 
Single fold design

Does anyone see a problem with folding these in this configuration?
I have space for one or two, tall subs with a small footprint.
Trying to decide if I should make the Don Snyder design recently showcased by Layertone and unfolded by Oliver http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/subwoofers/143714-lab12-tapped-horn-19.html
Or, maybe unfold this OD-ML-TL like this................... Here is the original design below.
singlefold.jpg


Or, even have the 45 degree mouth like this.
Singlefoldwithportmouth.jpg


Both of these are slightly different, mostly in port length, but also where the driver mounts in relation to the port and the fold.
Hrsp. says they both perform identically to the original design shown at the right.

Help me decide,

Dave
 
Dave,

That looks really good, I hope that bjorno and tb46 chime in as they are the brains behind the design. I have been looking at the Welti multi-sub AES papers and the taller design may work very well to place where his research indicates as optimal for a rectangular room.

Steve
 

Attachments

  • Welti Conclusions.jpg
    Welti Conclusions.jpg
    242.6 KB · Views: 785
Hi Y'all,

Post #65: "...anyone see a problem with folding these in this configuration?"

Don't see any problems, but the 45 degree duct opening to the room does not seem to be helpful in AkAbak. I didn't enter these particular enclosures, but an MLTL build around the LAB15, and tried the same duct modification without seeing any benefit. The angle at the inside can be evalutated in Hornresp, and may be helpful.

Regards,
 
Hi Y'all,

Post #65: "...anyone see a problem with folding these in this configuration?"

Don't see any problems, but the 45 degree duct opening to the room does not seem to be helpful in AkAbak. I didn't enter these particular enclosures, but an MLTL build around the LAB15, and tried the same duct modification without seeing any benefit. The angle at the inside can be evalutated in Hornresp, and may be helpful.

Regards,

Do you think it's harmful in any way?

It certainly looks cooler, at least imo.
 
Hi DrDyna,

Don't think it'll do any harm. I just dug out the scripts, and set up a comparison w/ straight duct ends, and angled duct ends (again, this is not for the box in this thread, but a similar MLTL) :

Regards,
 

Attachments

  • AkAbak_comp_2012_Dec20.jpg
    AkAbak_comp_2012_Dec20.jpg
    120.9 KB · Views: 697
OD_ML_TL Build

I have all the material cut (18 mm Baltic Birch) and am in the process of gluing and assembling.
I have Wool for stuffing, speakers and just got a new laptop with ARTA and REW installed.
I also have an ART dual USB pre and an ECM 8000 mic.
I also installed System Architect 3.30 for the Crown amps.
.
The design that I am building is a little different than the "final" listed earlier in this thread, but it seems to simulate well in HRSP.
I tried to simplify the design as much as possible.
I didn't like the idea of the large external flare, mainly because it is hard to define exactly where the port ends, plus the maximum velocity in the port is only ~ 2.3 M/S so I don't anticipate any port noise.
.
There is a ripple in the response at about 80 Hz that comes and goes with just a few mm's of change in duct or port length, but I am assuming that may go away with some stuffing.
.
I tried to get the driver to mount lower but I could only get it about 5 inches lower, and that greatly complicated the design.
So I am going to live with it just the way it is.
.
I should have some tests of a finished, stuffed cab (or two) with a broken in driver in a week or so.

Dave
 

Attachments

  • OD_ML_TL Easy Fold.jpg
    OD_ML_TL Easy Fold.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 799
  • HRSP.jpg
    HRSP.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 777
  • SPL.jpg
    SPL.jpg
    91.8 KB · Views: 756
Last edited:
Partway there

So I finished the first OD_ML_TL box and glued the entire thing except the last side.
I used 18 mm 13 ply Baltic Birch for the entire box.
I used Polyurethane glue and then caulked every joint with Dow Silicone II just to be safe, oh and about 50 Self-Sinking Small Flat Head Square Drive 1-5/8”_#6 screws along with my 6 big wood clamps
These screws McMaster-Carr Stock number 91520A301
I also used threaded inserts for the speaker mount bolts.
These inserts McMaster-Carr Stock number 92105A665. They work well but I had to use a larger than recommended drill (7.4 vs. 7.0 mm)
I screwed the last side on using foam gasket tape to seal it and left out the damping material.
I basically wanted to break in the driver and do a few FR sweeps without damping to see what it really does to the speakers FR.
The first thing I will say is, if you have a couple of designs, each with their own cutlist, don’t get the cutlists mixed up.
I was planning on leaving out the external flare, but…I used the wrong cutlist and am out of Baltic Birch that is long enough to make 4 more baffles. I have allot of 30” X 30” BB but the baffles have to be 33 and something So, I will either leave them with an external flare, which is only 2/3 of the size of the “final” design in this thread, or I will make a glue in piece to fill in the flare.
I am worried that the port is too short, and I do not know how much of the flare actually acts as a tuned port.
So here are a few Pics and some FR sweeps.
I used an ART dual USB pre with a Behringer ECM8000 microphone and REW on an HP ProBook 4530s, 2.3 GHz dual core with 4 GB DDR3, 500 GB drive and Windows 7 pro 64 bit software.
The USB pre does not list windows 7 as a usable O/S and it took me a while to get it working.
Also, the ART dual USB does not allow for calibration like a normal soundcard, or at least I can’t figure that out but the loopback response curve is not all that bad.
It drops off about 1 dB from 30 to 15 Hz and has some ripple maybe 1 dB each way in a sine shape (3 waves) between 14,000 and 22,000 Hz. Not that bad for what I am doing.

.
The FR plot was done with HP-22 Hz-48dB-BW and LP-120Hz-24dB-BW both programmed on a Crown XTi-1002 amplifier.
Also I set the limiters at 20V and then 22V (~93W and 108W) to protect the speakers and give a reference. The SPL numbers are set with a new Radio Shack SPL meter and are within +- 1 dB or probably better.
These measurements are 15 Cm off of floor and 1 meter from baffle surface in the center of the largest room I have.
The room however has concrete floor and walls with a drywall ceiling.
It does have a rug and some furniture like a soft couch and a giant soft chair.
I had wanted to do some measurements outside but the 6" of snow on the ground and the 15 degree temps made that less appealing. Maybe in a few weeks when the sub is finished.
I found when listening to the sub I preferred to use LP = 80 Hz-12 dB-BW and have gone down as low as HP = 20 Hz-48 dB-BW with the limiter set at between 20 and 24 volts. But I have seen some occasionally scary excursions with HP = 20 Hz and limit = 24 V (135 Watts), although only on movies with some big LF content.
I will admit that I really do not even notice that it is there until I either shut off the Crown amp or a really violent low scene comes along in a movie.I can't wait to have 2 of these spread around the room with some EQ on them.
I found it interesting to watch the cone during an RTA sweep with the 22 Hz-48 dB HP filter and starting the sweep at 10 Hz, the speaker cone starts to move with some large amplitude's, much bigger than I ever see even with the movies.
However the large amplitude occurs at 13 to 16 Hz and I can see the motion but hear nothing. Then the amplitude drops way down and i start to hear the speaker.
This makes me wonder if response below 20 Hz really does anything.
.
The pictures show construction at several steps, the gasketing that I used to seal the temp screwed on side panel, the sub hooked up in my den, my measurement setup and a few FR sweeps. I tried to make a comparison of HRSP and the RTA output but the scales are so different that it was hard to do.
I would have liked to do the measurement outside but the 6" of snow and 15 degree weather made that less appealing.
Next I will pull it apart and add damping, then do the measurements all over again.
If the FR curve does not improve quite a bit I am going to make an insert to cover the external flare, increasing the port length. I may also put a 3/4" divider in the port to help with aspect ratio.
So, here it is so far.
The measurements are first HP-22 Hz-48 dB-BW_LP-120 Hz 24 dB-BW. with the limiter set at 18 and 22 Volts.
The second shows the same crossover settings but with a limiter at 20 (93 W) and 22 Volts (108 W) plus the loopback calibration is also in the file,straight line at ~ 105 dB.
 

Attachments

  • 7_Measurement setup.JPG
    7_Measurement setup.JPG
    50.9 KB · Views: 303
  • 8_22-120-limit at 20 and 22 V plus loopback cal.jpg
    8_22-120-limit at 20 and 22 V plus loopback cal.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 366
  • 9_22-120-18 and 22 V limiter.jpg
    9_22-120-18 and 22 V limiter.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 355
  • 10_HRSP vs RTA.jpg
    10_HRSP vs RTA.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 349
  • 6_Undamped and gasketed sub.JPG
    6_Undamped and gasketed sub.JPG
    49.9 KB · Views: 335
  • 5_Gasket on box side.JPG
    5_Gasket on box side.JPG
    31.5 KB · Views: 287
  • 4_Screws and clamps.JPG
    4_Screws and clamps.JPG
    43.7 KB · Views: 246
  • 3_Path showing caulk and PU glue on angle.JPG
    3_Path showing caulk and PU glue on angle.JPG
    38.7 KB · Views: 261
  • 2_Finished box.JPG
    2_Finished box.JPG
    34.8 KB · Views: 667
  • 1_Bonding baffle.JPG
    1_Bonding baffle.JPG
    49.4 KB · Views: 703
Last edited:
So I finished the first OD_ML_TL box and glued the entire thing except the last side...The first thing I will say is, if you have a couple of designs, each with their own cutlist, don’t get the cutlists mixed up.
I was planning on leaving out the external flare, but…I used the wrong cutlist and am out of Baltic Birch that is long enough to make 4 more baffles. I have allot of 30” X 30” BB but the baffles have to be 33 and something So, I will either leave them with an external flare, which is only 2/3 of the size of the “final” design in this thread, or I will make a glue in piece to fill in the flare.
I am worried that the port is too short, and I do not know how much of the flare actually acts as a tuned port.

It is great to see this design being built!!! I plan to build in a few months and will also post the results. Looking at the measured data it seems a fairly good match to the model, will be very interesting to see the effect of the stuffing.

It does seem that the port is a bit short compared to the Bjorno modification (see attachment). Off the top of my head I can't recall if this would significanlty change the tuning of the design.

Great looking sub, i am getting impatient for my build.
 

Attachments

  • Built versus Original.jpg
    Built versus Original.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 358
This makes me wonder if response below 20 Hz really does anything.

Well, these are tuned at around 23-24hz by the look of it, so no, all you'll get below tuning is cone flapping.

This looks really promising though, I'll have to try a TC sounds version this summer once it warms up.

I wonder about tuning it a bit lower for HT use though, would a 16hz tune make the box a lot larger?
 
Well, these are tuned at around 23-24hz by the look of it, so no, all you'll get below tuning is cone flapping.

This looks really promising though, I'll have to try a TC sounds version this summer once it warms up.

I wonder about tuning it a bit lower for HT use though, would a 16hz tune make the box a lot larger?

Are you basing that on the response curves?
Remember, I am using a 22 Hz-48 dB / Octave High Pass.
.
Beyond that, I have no clue where the tuning is at,
I can say, the T/S parameters changed a bit after break-in of the speaker (if I can believe the DATS system).
I will post in more depth about this as well as the final (stuffed) tests soon.
As soon as the Dura-Tex dries.
.
NWCgrad, they seem to work well according to HRSP.
But, all these designs are kind of a guess, backed up with a simulation.
I am just unsure how long the effective port is with the external flare, and that makes me uncomfortable.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Are you basing that on the response curves?
Remember, I am using a 22 Hz-48 dB / Octave High Pass.

Negative, I believe when the first sims were first done by bjorno (b, correct me if I'm mistaken) the length of the line and the tuning were very much deliberate based on the driver parameters.

If you were to use a driver with a lower FS, I'm guessing you could tune the cabinet lower (longer?) which would result in less inaudible cone flapping (unloading below the tuning frequency) and lower usable response.
 
Finished, for now

I finally finished stuffing the box and doing the final gluing of the side onto the box.
I ran around it with a ¼” round over and put 2 good coats of Duratex on the box.
I put a fresh layer of foam sealant on the speaker and bolted it down using Socket Head cap screws.
Before I put the speaker in, I measured it again using DATS. I was surprised to see that Fs had risen from 22.0 to 22.8 Hz.
So I set it up and did some sweeps, and this time I realized that I could run it at a higher voltage than I was using. I had it limited to 24 V (135 Watts) but I found I could run 29 V (200 Watts) without distressing the speaker.
One thing I did notice is my other woofer cabinets are being excited to the point that I almost can see the cones move.
Anyway, here is a 15Hz to 300Hz sine sweep with a 22 Hz-48 dB/Octave BW_HP and a 180 Hz-24 dB/Octave BW_LP filter and the Voltage limiter set at 29.15 Volts.
.
When I did the first sweeps I saw a big hole at 34 Hz. I’m not sure if this is room acoustics or the speakers response.
I put an 8 dB boost at 34 Hz with a Q of 6 into the Crown amp and the response was almost flat after that.
I should note that I am not using any smoothing on this data. I see if I use 1/6 Octave smoothing my lumpy line will almost get flat, or at least real smooth and the hole at 34 Hz almost goes away. So I guess that is cheating.
.
I may play around with the port some, but with a little EQ it sounds great.
22 Hz-8th order HP...70 Hz-4th order LP with 8 dB boost at 34 Hz (Q=6).

I have a scope across the speaker wires and I love the way you can't tell the sub is even there until there is some really low stuff. Watching the scope really shows me that there isn't much low freq stuff most of the time.

Dave
 

Attachments

  • tn_sweep_stuffed-22hz-150hz-29v.jpg
    tn_sweep_stuffed-22hz-150hz-29v.jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 310
  • tn_Speakon.JPG
    tn_Speakon.JPG
    86.4 KB · Views: 156
  • tn_Port.JPG
    tn_Port.JPG
    176.2 KB · Views: 161
  • tn_Lab 12 Box.JPG
    tn_Lab 12 Box.JPG
    96.5 KB · Views: 138
  • tn_Finished.JPG
    tn_Finished.JPG
    76.3 KB · Views: 159
  • tn_Final Box.JPG
    tn_Final Box.JPG
    78 KB · Views: 274
  • tn_Wool.jpg
    tn_Wool.jpg
    358.5 KB · Views: 376
Last edited:
One thing I did notice is my other woofer cabinets are being excited to the point that I almost can see the cones move.

When I did the first sweeps I saw a big hole at 34 Hz. I’m not sure if this is room acoustics or the speakers response.
Dave,

Looks good, the big hole at 34 Hz easily could be due to the room, but try shorting the other woofers out, they may be acting as tuned bass traps.
Unpowered un-shorted speakers can have surprising influence.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.