Lab 12 Based Offset Driver - Mass Loaded - Transmission Line (OD-ML-TL) Design by Bj
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
bjorno
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Quote:
 Originally Posted by NWCgrad Bjorno, I am not sure what the information actually means. From the schematic diagram it appears the enclosure consists of 4 segments: Segment 1: 50.479 liters Driver Diaphram/Throat Chamber: 0.913 L Segment 2: 55.712 L Segment 4: 10.799 L How do I calculate the enclosure from this infomation. From the schematic for the MAL-X I could somewhat see where the shape comes from, but with this design I am completely lost. I was able to download hornresp on my new laptop, entered your values and played around for awhile - but I am way over my head.
Its nice to know the volumes but pretty useless when calculating the practical CSA:s:
Start with S1(the closed end) and divide with 31.4 cm= driver frame width + a very small baffle clearance, i.e. 513/31.4= ~16.34 cm
As long as the CSA is 513cm^2 the depth width would be ~16.34 cm...

Then divide S3=S4 with 31.4===> depth width =~5.38 cm
Now fold the enclosure while preserving the sum of L12+L23+L34+L45...

Its DIY Your Job! and is best done with a paper and pen + hours(weeks for some DIY:rs ) ,if it takes.

b

tb46
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Hi Y'all,

Sitting here w/ minor chemical burns on three fingers (stupid, stupid, stupid), and can't really do anything usefull, so here is rough try at it:

Regards,
Attached Files
 LAB12_OD_ML_TL_by_bjorno.pdf (20.0 KB, 676 views)
__________________
Oliver

bjorno
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Quote:
 Originally Posted by tb46 Hi Y'all, Sitting here w/ minor chemical burns on three fingers (stupid, stupid, stupid), and can't really do anything usefull, so here is rough try at it: Regards,

Hi Oliver,

Thats a very nice folding tb46 is an and when it comes to fold quarter-wave boxes!

b

Ps: I will try another day to run this box in MJK to find out the optimal stuffing...and post to this thread,of course.

Last edited by bjorno; 15th July 2012 at 08:21 PM.

 15th July 2012, 09:04 PM #14 tb46   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Texas Hi bjorno, Yes, the stuffing will be the key. Regards, __________________ Oliver
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Quote:
 Originally Posted by tb46 Hi Y'all, Sitting here w/ minor chemical burns on three fingers (stupid, stupid, stupid), and can't really do anything usefull, so here is rough try at it: Regards,
I feel your pain on the chemical burns...in organic chemistry class I set my hand in a puddle of concentrated phenol - the skin was sagging 3" on the side of my hand when I first felt the burn (still have the scar today, 20+ years later).

Thank you for the folding of the design, now that I see it I can make sence of the data presented by Bjorno. Very nice compact enclosure, looks relatively simple to build.

To my untrained eye, it looks a lot like a slot-ported enclosure, how does the performace differ (I am sure that it does)? If you raise the driver does it change performance (not that I want to, I am just curious)?

I like the looks of this build!!!

Last edited by NWCgrad; 16th July 2012 at 07:53 AM.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Quote:
 Originally Posted by bjorno I will try another day to run this box in MJK to find out the optimal stuffing...and post to this thread,of course.
Thanks Bjorno, does the stuffing go in S1 between the driver and S5?

 16th July 2012, 03:35 PM #17 tb46   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Texas Hi NWCgrad, Post #15: "... it looks a lot like a slot-ported enclosure, how does the performace differ (I am sure that it does)? If you raise the driver does it change performance..." I think the slot is high enough @ 2.119" to give you a very similar performance to the model; but, with any folded port with a wide aspect ratio it might take a little experimenting. One way to change this would be to run a center divider (e.g.: a 2x4) down the middle of the slot/duct and raise the duct height to make up for the lost cross-sectional area. If you raise the driver you shorten L12 and lengthen L23, this will change the performance from the model. You could raise the driver, reroute the L12 path (straight up to the top of the enclosure, then back, then down) and the L23 path (lower the horizontal divider, and shorten the vertical divider to make up for the length gained by raising the driver), and arrive at the model dimensions; the "room for amp" would now be in the middle of the back of the enclosure (I think) :-). This is thought as a starting point, you can add corner reflectors, braces, cleats, widen the box, add midrange and tweeter in the front..... Regards, __________________ Oliver Last edited by tb46; 16th July 2012 at 03:38 PM.
 16th July 2012, 04:20 PM #18 NWCgrad   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Frederick, Maryland Oliver, I believe I will leave it alone, it is almost identical in height to my mains. It would look good to cluster all four units across the front wall, when combined with my MAL-X T-TQWP I should have the low end covered Thanks again for your assistance. Steve
bjorno
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Hi,

A quick drawn picture made from Olivers .pdf solving a couple of possible upcoming problems... but not yet revealed in a simulation, I still work on this...

b
Attached Images
 SPL-version.GIF (11.2 KB, 1411 views) Slot_slot-port.GIF (18.0 KB, 1217 views)

Last edited by bjorno; 16th July 2012 at 04:36 PM.

 17th July 2012, 12:38 AM #20 NWCgrad   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Frederick, Maryland Bjorno, I like the larger opening, it looks like what Oliver was suggesting. I assume this change would not negatively impact the sound, just increase the abiility to play at high SPL. Looks really good! Thanks again. Steve

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Squeak Full Range 0 12th March 2011 12:02 PM ashok Subwoofers 0 22nd March 2010 04:13 PM adamt Multi-Way 3 26th June 2006 12:36 PM Dave Jones Multi-Way 4 12th April 2004 12:18 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 PM.