|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
guessing the more bends at the mouth (end where sound expels) is to simulate the more flared end of the horn? you say the round end is superfluous... I would have thought using a rounded end would help control the box air volume better. I only knocked up that example in SketchUp quickly to capture the idea that MaVo mentioned. all things being equal and it wasn't undesirable to have a rounded top to the box (say it was easily doable and maybe even desirable) would a more angular box be more technically correct? the reason I ask is because I don't have a very good understanding of how sound goes around corners and don't want to go to a lot of work for it to be unproductive. |
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL
|
In that case, Silent Screamer, you may not want to build a TH. My impression is there is more "art" needed than other systems (in both wood-stuff and driver selection) and they are less forgiving in the sense that once the glue is dry, you get what you made; unlike BR, for example, where ports can easily be modified, cabinets stuffed, etc.
Ben
__________________
Dennesen ESL tweets, Dayton-Wright ESL (110-3200Hz), mixed-bass Klipschorn w/param EQ plus giant OB using 1960's Stephens woofer HiFi aspirations since 1956 |
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney
|
Hey Ben not too worried about the cabinet side of things as I am reasonably skilled with power tools, but I am having trouble trying to work out Hornresp. Wish there was more pictures to the instructions as I don't do all that well with text descriptions.
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
|
__________________
Oliver |
|
|
|
#65 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Yo scream,
Hornresp was intimidating to me as well. The above link is the one i used o get over that. Then i just began stuffing parameters into it for kicks.
__________________
System: Hitachi HT-320, HK 330a, Energy 3.1e speakers and xbox360, android phone headphone out for hirez FLAC playback. |
|
|
|
#66 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
|
Hi there : could the more experienced TH-builders propose a few well-suited drivers 12" or 15" for a tapped horn bass/subwoofer ? are the t/s criteria similar for a TQWT ? What kind of MF and HF enclosures work best with a TH woofer of e.g. 40-400 Hz ? This thread is very informative, thanks.
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Somebody talks about picking suitable drivers. Art or science? And don't forget, the impressions you get on this forum about THs may not be the same as what you'd hear anywhere else. Ben
__________________
Dennesen ESL tweets, Dayton-Wright ESL (110-3200Hz), mixed-bass Klipschorn w/param EQ plus giant OB using 1960's Stephens woofer HiFi aspirations since 1956 Last edited by bentoronto; 29th May 2012 at 02:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Use it if you want to. Fold patterns can also be what you want, they don't "simulate" anything, but more folds make for more deviation from Hornresp predictions. If you want to make a rounded top, go ahead, but it it won't affect the sound quality in the low frequency range. Art |
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
If you look at various designs, most list a variety of drivers that will give good results in the particular design. Although there is a wide variety of speakers that can be used in TH, none will give much more than 2 octaves of smooth response, 40-160 Hz would be about the limit. If a 400 Hz crossover point is desired, TH are just not a good choice, unless the range was only to be from 100-400 Hz, requiring another sub (and path length time compensation) below. If you do a lot of stuffing,TH/TQWP range may be extended, but sensitivity is lowered to the point where a FLH or a BR may be a better choice. Art |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
|
@weltersys : I am planning a setup with a middle and a high frequency flared horn plus compression drivers. Since a bass horn is unpractical, I would like to build a tapped horn subwoofer ( lowest possible - 500 Hz). Good drivers : high EPB, low Qts, high fs and Xmax... right ? Is a TH a good addition for flared horns ?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sound of tapped horn subwoofer | super10018 | Subwoofers | 15 | 28th January 2013 02:15 PM |
| jbl gto804 tapped horn/ folded horn | 2009thread1 | Subwoofers | 99 | 26th August 2012 01:10 AM |
| Speaker for a Tapped horn subwoofer. | Jaime | Subwoofers | 0 | 25th November 2010 12:29 AM |
| Lab 12 Tapped Horn, Ron's Austin II, T-Horn, CNC Photo Background | layertone | Subwoofers | 15 | 23rd January 2010 05:12 AM |
| Ron's Austin II, old T-Horn, Lab12 Tapped horn, CNC Photo Background | layertone | Full Range | 2 | 23rd December 2009 12:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |