Sub tuning - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th September 2003, 01:00 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern Virginia
Default Sub tuning

Is there any problem, besides Frequ. res., obviously, with loading a driver in a smaller-than-optimal enclosure tuned to the recommonded frequency? I'd like to get a smaller box at the expense of some LF, but I'm wondering if there are other compromises......
What gives?
Thanks,
-fortyquid
Speed speller ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2003, 12:22 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
mikee12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pi/messages/2062.html

if the box is too small it will be overdamped(a good thing sound quality wise)

ports will be longer also
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2003, 12:33 PM   #3
SimontY is offline SimontY  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
SimontY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield, North England
Send a message via MSN to SimontY
Hi,
I think you'll get a more lumpy response, more output (from humped response), and I think you get more power handling in smaller boxes too. I think using a too small box is why many commercial subs sound a bit crap. Smaller cab. means there'll be less to resonate I suppose, which is of course good. And easier to build. Also, I think group delay is worse/different with size.

-Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2003, 07:33 PM   #4
MarkMcK is offline MarkMcK  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
I believe we really need a library we can all access. Years ago Bullock or somebody else worked out hundreds of alignments and misalignments and put them into tables. Just about every practical combination was covered.

I have even measured several of these alignments, including some of the extreme alignments. I always measured less ripple than predicted. Small lumps and not large lumps. This tends to undermine the validity of the theory. Still, it is invalid in good way. The extreme alignments perform better than predicted.

I have also found that most of the poor sounding sub systems have been because of poor summing and poor balance between upper range drivers and sub instead of the particular alignment or box size of sub. Don't be fooled by all the talk that crossovers below 200 Hz are not critical. They are. Poor summing and poor balance will radically degrade the sound.

I have measured some subs that show such an incredible rising frequency response that without really high quality instrumentation you could never design a properly summing crossover. Most of the commercial line level sub crossovers are just too limited and simple.

Good luck with the project, just get the crossover summing and balance correct.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tuning at or below Fs tech.knockout Multi-Way 23 3rd February 2012 02:06 PM
Tuning a PR? Animalnisse Multi-Way 2 11th December 2006 08:31 PM
tuning a box too low? jaygeorge1979 Subwoofers 8 14th January 2006 10:44 PM
Tuning Qes Qts Bl Mms P Zolt Multi-Way 10 21st April 2005 05:24 PM
Sub Box Tuning Fazorcat Subwoofers 6 2nd March 2005 05:30 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2