compund motor subwoofer - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th December 2011, 06:54 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default compund motor subwoofer

i have some midfi unmarked 10 inch subwoofer. play pretty well in ported design but at moderate levels. i am making an experiment for lineartity and greater power handling by improving BL curve linearity and dual spider.


Basically the idea is from compound puu push /isobarick subwoofer loading. The idea is to take it further from here. As we know that in ideal isobarik loading there is non linearity in trapped air, Vas is halfed so is 3db loss inefficiency. Lower distortion one motor is pushing while other pulling, the BL curve gets symettrical.

I intend to remove the surround and cone of one woofer , now i would have one motor with voice coil and basket. Invert it on top of the second woofer , bolt the two bakets together and connect the voicee coils with PVC pipe of the size of the voice coil i.e 3 inch with lenght of exact space between then glue them terogether.

Now both motors and two coils oare physically connceted in pull-push mehtod, BL curve non linearity is corrected and so is spider. A variation is like this
:



But obviously it would have one cone , one surround, two motors , two coils. Now my question:

Since one surround and cone is removed its compliance would be altered, would it introduce any distorition ? Fs would vary ?

Xmax would not increase i know but i am aiming at SQ here. suggestions please pictures to follow quickly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 12sub.jpg (73.1 KB, 163 views)
File Type: jpg 1%20cone%20expld.jpg (65.1 KB, 156 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 07:01 PM   #2
badman is offline badman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
badman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Tustin, SoCal
Have you reviewed JBL's Differential drive? Worth looking over given your experimentation.

On your prototype, I'd cut some windows out of the enclosed spider sub-assembly for further ventilation, since you're going to all this trouble. Also, I'd want to use shorting rings and extended poles to give a head-start on the low distortion part.

Will be interesting to see where this takes you!
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 07:18 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
something like this:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (40.9 KB, 153 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 07:30 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
better this one.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (60.2 KB, 147 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 07:45 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
EVEN more dtailed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 8.jpg (75.0 KB, 139 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 08:43 PM   #6
epa is offline epa  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: amsterdam
nice experiment,i like it.
i think the hole moving asambly should be in ballance ,i think a pvc pipe would become to heavy compared to the cone,but who knows.
the added weight of the extra voice coil and suspension wil lower fs already.
maybe try something lighter to connect the coils,paper maybe.
__________________
one good thing about music ,when it hit you feel no pain.
so hit me with music
. hr driver db
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 08:58 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
I'm pretty sure this has already been done. Co-Drive I think it was called.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 09:15 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
The differetial is different. it uses 3 stacked magnets and two coils on a single former to maintian linearity of BL curve , symmetr but no uniformity, secondly the spider and nno linearlity in both directions as well as control over lateral movements in my design..

I think its a good idea for DIY and not commercially viable for looks and odd intallation, and i think going to loose some SD as cone centre would be locked outiwth PVC pipe. Again it would be running i series to ensure same current through both coils.

Any guess on Fs, Vas and Qts, Qms, Qes. ??? and SQQQQ
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2011, 09:18 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Co-Drive is the first figure. its different. see the last post picture. However is one way of doing too difficult. This can be done by removing , one surround, inverting the subwoofer and just paste it un-amended woofer, or remove the cone as well and connect the first woofer VC with a light pipe to the second woofer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2011, 02:20 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
You can simulate this in AkAbak. I think you will find that it will perform slightly better than a standard "isobaric" configuration, but probably not enough better to make it worth the effort.

I used AkAbak to compare a "standard" isobaric (2 drivers mounted face to face, thus a small air compliance between them) with a "rigid" isobaric (no compliance between them). The overall performance was almost unchanged, but there was a difference in excursion between the two drivers in the "standard" isobaric configuration.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compact Disc Motor and Turntable - Advices for Replace and Motor Service wanted tiefbassuebertr Digital Source 5 2nd August 2010 10:19 AM
Help required for using a FDD motor as a turntable motor. binspaul Analogue Source 5 13th May 2009 04:59 AM
Lambda motor vs. XBL^2 motor vs. any other motor Thinkcat Subwoofers 16 23rd December 2008 07:23 AM
Question about compund driver placement GhettoSQ Subwoofers 14 11th June 2006 02:47 PM
DIY TT: motor, motor PS, platter speed measurements dice45 Analogue Source 52 9th May 2006 02:07 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2