|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Nothing "really" works exactly as the theory suggests, that why its theory. That doesn't mean though that it won't work well if you do it. SL specifically goes for a very low new Q (around 0.5) when he implements his versions of LT'd subwoofers, and there no reason it won't work as well as any other powered EQ'd (and compressed / limited) subwoofer out there. In fact the problem for amateur sub builds is the general lack of adaptive power / excursion management built into some commercial subwoofers. Personally here I'd go for a peaking 2nd order high pass filter, with some ripple, such that it levels off the mild peak around 100Hz and boosts the lower bass, and then stops the driver being overdriven for low bass, so it would have to be 3rd order, for an eventual 5th order roll-off. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 12th December 2011 at 04:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Ha ha, that's very true, especially for speakers.
What I meant more exactly was that the time response won't be compensated as theory suggests, so you might as well just focus on the amplitude domain and EQ the room. Hmmm, it's making me wonder what does happen to the time response-it's been a loooooong time since I looked at that. Anyway, if the boxes are too boomy, my gut feeling is it should not be so much, and some judicious EQ should pretty much fix it. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Barcelona
|
Thanks for all the advice. I'll try with the small boxes and add some of this filling. Then I'll do some in-room EQ with the miniDSP and hope to get some good results
I'll let you know how it all works out. Thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
The time response and frequency response are completely interchangeable, one determines the other and vice versa. So yes concentrate on the ampltude domain, make that smooth and the time domain will follow. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Otherwise Linkwitz transform is probably the easiest solution. Aperiodic enclosures basically just act like a notch filter, so you throw away output. Since you have miniDSP, you are all set for EQ.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Pallas . seems interesting u seem to have good idea. are u a hobbyist ? where are u from ?was just wondering
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Measuring Qtc | MCPete | Multi-Way | 5 | 13th May 2010 11:49 PM |
| QTC question? | fazman | Subwoofers | 9 | 13th February 2006 03:19 AM |
| Qtc.... Oh Sh@@@t! | Learnincurve | Subwoofers | 20 | 27th January 2005 08:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.26787 seconds (29.91% PHP - 70.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |