Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd December 2011, 11:15 PM   #11
bjorno is offline bjorno  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Send a message via MSN to bjorno
HI,

Quote:
..and our young speaker builders head just exploded..


Quote:
A T-TQWT will be relatively large and complex. Probably not the best to cut your teeth on.
Not that large if the footprint is the norm and what counts.

Quote:
500 watts with this driver in a sealed cab. plop it in the corner, crank it up and the cops will be knocking on your door...
SPL ......

Quote:
...A ported cab looks like it will have serious group delay issues according to WinISD...
..in other words you say there is a serious phase problem that WinISD is reporting. Is it in-band or off-band?

Quote:
SPLAT


b
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dayton-TIT320C-4_Ported_80Hz-LR4.JPG (795.0 KB, 141 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2011, 12:42 AM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Hi,
Thanks for all the advice guys, its been really helpful. Although it has been a bit of an information overload so I've had to read quite a few articles to keep up.
After reading all the posts I think my best option would just be to go for the 2 cu ft. sealed enclosure. For a first build it might be a bit silly to dive straight in at the deep end. As long as the sub still packs a punch I'm happy, then sometime in the new year I can replace it with a more complex design.
I'll probably use a cube design for simplicity measuring 400x400x400mm. Although I am slightly unsure how to add bracing to the box, so could anyone explain or post a link on how you're supposed to do it. Also, what kind of bass response will I get from a box like this and is it that much different to a ported design? Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2011, 02:08 AM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderMonkey View Post
what kind of bass response will I get from a box like this and is it that much different to a ported design? Thanks
Here are two examples one sealed in 3cf and one vented in 5cf.

bracing... is a Black art...

just kidding, Speaker Building

edit: for both designs I included the dayton amps built in HP at 18Hz.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tfm.jpg (531.8 KB, 123 views)
File Type: jpg spl.jpg (643.0 KB, 113 views)
File Type: jpg excursion.jpg (602.8 KB, 96 views)
File Type: jpg airvelo.jpg (607.9 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg GD.jpg (598.2 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg stuff.jpg (644.9 KB, 19 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2011, 11:19 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Hi,
Thanks again. So for a sealed box would you recommend a 3 cu ft. box over a 2 cu ft.? Also if I built a ported design I would need the ports to have a right angle in them to fit, so would that affect the required port length?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2011, 05:08 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
for a sealed box 2 vs 3 dosen't really matter much, plug them into WinISD, you'll see.

When bending/folding a port/tube/pipe you measure down the center of the bend, this is the functional length and should be the same as calculated.

Last edited by revboden; 4th December 2011 at 05:11 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 11:47 AM   #16
johnr66 is offline johnr66  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjorno View Post
HI,

..in other words you say there is a serious phase problem that WinISD is reporting. Is it in-band or off-band?

b
Good question. For the music I listen to, it would be mainly out of band. For the so called music these kids listen to these days...
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 08:05 PM   #17
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
I looked at the Titanic woofer (watch the tutorial on the web page), and gave Parts Express a call, they said sure, it’s great woofer, but also look at the 15" HT, it is also a very good woofer, and less money.

http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=295-468&FTR=295-468

That said, a lot of folks like the CSS TRIO12, with a 500 watt plate amp. I almost bought one, but decided what I have now is pretty good.

However, I think my next big woofer is going to be a CSS, TRIO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 11:01 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Hi,
Thanks, I had actually considered getting the Dayton 15" but it would have worked out more expensive since I found a good deal on the 12" titanic. However, now I look at it again it wouldn't be too much more expensive and the performance definitely seems to be a lot better. It really annoys me though how to import these things to the UK costs almost as much as the Woofer itself. But I'm really confused now as the CSS TRIO12 seems to be pretty good too.
Could someone adivse me, if money wasn't an issue, as to which woofer they would recommend out of the 12" titanic, 15" HT and TRIO12. Or any other subs around the price range. I am thinking of settling on the 15" HT just for the sheer size of the thing, but is it really worth the extra cash. Also what would be the recommended box size for a vented 15" HT?
And you're probably right about the music, I don't think I'll really notice the phase problem when I blasting heavy metal out of it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 11:49 PM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I've worked with the Dayton's In BR boxes, the rss390hf-4 is very good but wants to be in a very large box ~14ft^3 (396L). The rss315hf-4 will give you the same sound minus a little output in a ~5ft^3 (141L) box.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2011, 08:24 AM   #20
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
It is tough choosing a speaker now days, amazing what’s out there right now.

I was really close to buying a Titanic, I was going to put it in a double wall, huge vented box. The PE fellow said I may have a better Home Theater sub with the 15"HT.

This is a good site for the TRIO; one of the members forwarded it to me. Regretful about the shipping, that is a drag.

http://www.meniscusaudio.com/
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dayton 10" Titanic Mk III SW Kit lomax1 Subwoofers 0 30th December 2010 12:08 AM
FS: Dayton Titanic 12" Subs svereb Swap Meet 0 25th January 2010 02:08 AM
Dayton 12" Titanic Kit vs. other subs ezkcdude Subwoofers 1 20th January 2006 04:36 AM
Titanic Mark III 12" parms Dave Jones Subwoofers 0 27th February 2005 10:57 PM
Enclosure for 15" Dayton Titanic ihearyou Multi-Way 3 19th December 2003 12:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Page generated in 0.18190 seconds (63.37% PHP - 36.63% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio