|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Quote:
thanks for the inputs... i'm getting some mixed messages here - at least it seems that way to someone with next to no knowledge of this stuff (ME). you are suggesting the correct approach to determine the max power that can be used would be to model the driver in the correct enclosure size, then without applying any eq whatsoever - High Pass, Low Pass, Linkwitz Transform, etc - increase the 'System Input Power' until the cone excursion reaches the Xmax at the lowest expected frequency that will be reproduced by the driver? in this case, with 625 Watts of input, i reach the Xmax at 20 hz. since i will be high passing above that, is this safe? see attached... |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Whatever the confusion the above is simply wrong. Power at Xmax is fixed. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
I just inputted the TS specs you provided WinISD dosent like them at all. I'll try to model this in BBP. WinISD does model PEQ correctly, input fc =30 Q=1 gain =5.7db
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Voltage squared divided by the impedance = power in watts. The amount of voltage to reach or exceed Xmax is different at each frequency, looking at impedance and excursion curves gives you an idea what power is needed to reach Xmax at a given frequency. At higher frequencies, excursion is less for a given SPL, so the speaker will burn before it breaks. Down low, Xmax often will be exceeded well before Pmax. How much power to use depends on program material, if the material is upper bass, very large power peaks are not a problem for most woofers, while down low, using much more power than required to reach Xmax will result in distortion and potential mechanical damage. Big LF boosts also make it more likely to clip the amplifier, a clipped amp can often put out much more than it's rated power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Something about these specs is wrong. power at 33hz Xmax is up in the 900w range in one sim and ~300w in another...
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
You will generally get mixed messages, from the clueless to the informed. What you say above is correct, so there is not much more to add really. Of course the more bass EQ you add the lower the average level it will be able to handle, but it makes no difference to the maximum power the said driver in its box can handle, just as much as EQ does not change the max SPL a sealed box can produce at any frequency. Heavy EQ, e.g. a +20dB LT gives you a huge upper bass surplus. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
wow... my laptop just freaked out... time to reload windows, sorry for the confusion.
listen to Sreten, he's right. dang computer
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
One reason I found to get a crazy powerfull amp in the UK even though I didn't rearly need it was that it just didn't cost much more. Apart from the fan noise the EP4000 is awsome
__________________
CHR-70+Subs |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The only thing I can add is that for music you don't get a single note. I'd be quite happy using a 1KW amp for a max calculated 625W, and at the lower end using 150W for a max calculated 50W given its going to have a higher c/o point than the higher power case. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about V & A in power supply | mossen | Power Supplies | 3 | 16th October 2011 06:00 PM |
| Amp power supply question | theAnonymous1 | Solid State | 12 | 30th August 2008 05:06 AM |
| Power amp question | adventfan | Solid State | 3 | 8th December 2007 05:48 PM |
| Op amp power question | speakerguy79 | Parts | 1 | 11th February 2007 10:04 PM |
| T-Amp power supply question | The Rocker | Class D | 2 | 27th May 2005 08:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.17361 seconds (67.34% PHP - 32.66% MySQL) with 11 queries |