Compromise driver orientation? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th September 2011, 10:58 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default Compromise driver orientation?

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
I'm committed to building a stealth sub posing as an endtable with books and a lamp on top... maybe a potted fern. False hinges and pull handle on the front "door". No visible speaker or grille. This means bottom firing or rear firing.

Plugging in the TS numbers at the PE calculation page for down-firing candidates my Viva 12in neo rates 6.7 percent. Barely above the 5 percent cutoff for comfort. That's due to it's 9mm xmax. How about rear firing? My take on many of the the threads here is that corner or wall loading is less than optimal for most accurate bass for a 100 percent music sub.

What about the above? A six inch wide slot in the front of the sub cabinet is formed by a false front. The rear compartment is sealed. Still floor coupled/loaded but to a much lesser extent. Those feet are already six inches tall, and the cone center is another eight to ten inches above those.

Any thoughts?

Last edited by peace brainerd; 19th September 2011 at 11:07 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2011, 11:23 PM   #2
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
This will work fine, you will probably get a little extra mass loading.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2011, 11:26 PM   #3
adason is offline adason  United States
diyAudio Member
 
adason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
why not just to have the woofer dowfireing like in many other subwoofers? simpler to construct...
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2011, 11:35 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Might not have been clear enough on this. I'd rather be 100 percent "no worries" about horizontally mounting this driver since PE suggests that it's a little outside of the recommended zone for such orientation based on their formula, particularly since it's got only 9mm xmax. There's not a lot of room for droop there.

Still tempted to return this driver for the Peerless 12. Peerless 830500 12" XLS Subwoofer. This might be the deciding factor in the end.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 12:03 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Hmmm, that Peerless measures approx the same percentage of sag/xmax as the Vifa.

Guess I'll do the hidden build with this one and call it good. Not much extra carpentry in there really just to put one extra baffle in place and just about the best physical protection for the woofer I might manage.

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 01:03 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
That'll work just fine

nice idea!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 02:15 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
if its a music only sub, why do you need more xmax? Pro audio drivers have around that xmax and they are music only.....i don't think you need a sub that plays down to 18hz for music...unless your music calls for that i guess?
unless you are using this for HT as well...then 20hz is necessary
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 10:54 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
just simply turn it around, so the driver faces the wall.
depending on the room accustics and listener position it can be benefical anyways.
Less to worry about if you ask me
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 05:37 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
The plenum seems a bit large, no need to have the exit area larger than the cone's SD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 10:38 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
The plenum seems a bit large, no need to have the exit area larger than the cone's SD.
Thank you. That's exactly the kind of advice i was hoping for.
The Sd is 506.7 sq cm. I'll calculate that aperture within a margin over that for comfort and see how much smaller it makes it. That should help me reduce the depth of this sub as well since it started out as a very deep 21 inch file cabinet.

Found the cabinet at my favorite thrift, St. Vincent DePaul yesterday.
Ten dollars.
Click the image to open in full size.

It's solid oak. Not one stitch of veneer (edges of all panels are visible). Office file of some sort. Antique, but not of any collectible value beyond what I want to use it for. Nice thing about this really old oak, especially if it's been well preserved over the years by coats of paint and varnish, is that the grain is gorgeous beyond most off the shelf stuff at the big box stores. Not easy to see in this shot, but it amazingly beautiful...
Click the image to open in full size.


All that needs done is to disassemble, sand off the finish with a vac connected orbital sander, reduce the overall height by four inches, reassemble, slap on a coat of urethane, and this is what it looks like drawn to exact scale along with my present speakers..
Click the image to open in full size.
It's 3/4 inch solid oak all around. What I'll probably do is build a sub out of 1/2 inch MDF to exact outer dimensions to fit within this cabinet's inner dimensions and glue it within. That solves my sealing, mass, and joint strength issues. Also plan to keep the front hinges and keyhole visible, and put some books and a lamp on top to disguise it better... more invisible bass!
Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by peace brainerd; 20th September 2011 at 10:57 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting finding: Driver orientation effects T/S parameters. ByronInPortland Subwoofers 19 13th June 2011 01:20 AM
Driver orientation for T/S parameters Buzzy Subwoofers 2 7th May 2008 02:39 PM
Port And Driver Orientation? jpvt68 Subwoofers 7 7th April 2008 10:30 PM
Looking for a copy of Adireaudio's Driver Orientation pdf? TimA Subwoofers 3 2nd August 2007 12:02 PM
Isobaric driver orientation: which is best? Javaman Multi-Way 25 1st January 2002 12:20 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2