Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd September 2011, 10:58 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I just modeled two of the sd315a-88s in a ppsl 2.877cf sealed box with a linkwitz transform (f0=56.962, Q0=.703, fp=20, Qp .707). =
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2011, 11:25 PM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Don't want to get too off track here, but what is the state of the Linkwitz Transform today? Last I was looking into this stuff was about two years ago. Is the circuit available as an inexpensive plug/play compliment to an existing plate amp? Or at least simple to incorporate on the board? Two twelves for the price of my single eh? You want to poison any hope for settlement on this matter don't you?

Quote:
pure music types... 'cough' BS 'cough',
some of us are mastering engineers for movie production. FOH squeeks, roadies, system designers, and Cal. what more could a person want?
I seem to have an unpopular take on the home theater experience. If I'm there in Florida witnessing a live launch of the space shuttle or viewing a blockbuster adventure film near front center of an IMAX theater, then visceral thunder is pretty much a natural accompaniment; an expectation that needs to be satisfied.

I've viewed films in a few home theaters on 90+ inch screens with pretty spectacular subwoofers and surround channels in operation and while satisfying in some sort of faster, more powerful, 0-60 thrill seeking regard, the whole experience just seemed fundamentally out of balance to me, like a housecat with a lion's roar (and I suck at simile). Maybe more like a moped with a harley engine. Ok, no better.... but you get my point.

I've got a 50in plasma television and I watch movies via the internal speakers and a diy 10in powered 1.5ft sealed subwoofer in a slim flat box tucked under the television stand out of sight. Even that sub is set as I described above in this thread; It just extends the internal speakers. 99 percent of home theater lovers would reject this with a shudder of contempt. But I think it's precisely right for the size of my screen and dimensions of my 12 x 20 x 8 living room. And I'm definitely a movie "lover" who logs a lot of hours watching. If I'm still around when wall sized 8'x12' LCD becomes an affordable installation for middle income types like myself, then I'll be talking subs to match the experience. As long as I'm viewing "reality" through a 50 inch rectangle the audio shouldn't jar too overwhelmingly with that "reality".

But again, I realize my tastes aren't anything like the norm.

Last edited by peace brainerd; 23rd September 2011 at 11:54 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 12:17 AM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Honest to god I didn't go looking for this. Just after I posted the above I dropped by avsforum following a google search for applications using that Dayton 12in DVC and saw this in the same thread there.
Click the image to open in full size.

Quote:
This is a 4th order isobaric sub with 2 18" Peavey Black Widow drivers. 3/4" Particleboard veneered with Poplar veneer and a 1/2" Poplar surface with glass inlay. Port (not shown) is on the wall side.
Somehow... I just don't see why the toddler that belongs to that toy bucket needs to be evacuating his bowels in terror while watching Franklin the Turtle on a 24 inch set.

Joking aside, even though this television is well shy of the, I don't know... 90inch average ? of the more serious HT setups, it does illustrate the point. Watching Transformers, or Black Hawk Down, on the above might just test the limits of anyone's willing suspension of disbelief.

Last edited by peace brainerd; 24th September 2011 at 12:41 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 01:26 AM   #24
abn1701 is offline abn1701  Mexico
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bottom view of Muse 18 subwoofer.
They used the 831727 peerless driver , not suited for downfiring, so the designer opted for an angled baffle. I also would like to build something like the Muse
but I only have one driver (831727).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Muse 18 subwoofer.jpg (62.5 KB, 73 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 03:07 AM   #25
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
actually, I'm all for subtle. my personal HT uses a single 12, the old 315-88 in a 4.25ft^3 box port tuned to ~18Hz it rolls off nicely ~4db per octave and is very musical and accurate at low levels. The bonus is I can watch movies at night without upsetting the neighbors and still get a visceral experience because of the clarity at low frequencies/spl.

But, It can keep up with my 7.1 system flat to 110db, 60hz to 90Hz... which is frightening. I've seen friends jump over the couch during LOTR 1 when the bad guys army starts marching.. from a sitting position (which is funny). Having something that can do both is nice to have.

Last edited by revboden; 24th September 2011 at 03:15 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 03:29 AM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I should add that the box has dual ports, one port open tunes the box to ~14Hz, both open tunes the box to ~18Hz.

For background music i choke it down to 14Hz, for movies or music with more oomph open both ports. For classical I plug both ports and have a sealed cab with a Qtc of .512
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 03:56 AM   #27
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
Quote:
Originally Posted by peace brainerd View Post
Cal, do you think it's worth my while to return this driver in exchange for the
Peerless XLS 12 inch?
Hi pb,

I don't know the driver so I can't comment. Anyone else know?
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 05:14 AM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
actually, I'm all for subtle. my personal HT uses a single 12, the old 315-88 in a 4.25ft^3 box port tuned to ~18Hz it rolls off nicely ~4db per octave and is very musical and accurate at low levels. The bonus is I can watch movies at night without upsetting the neighbors and still get a visceral experience because of the clarity at low frequencies/spl.

But, It can keep up with my 7.1 system flat to 110db, 60hz to 90Hz... which is frightening. I've seen friends jump over the couch during LOTR 1 when the bad guys army starts marching.. from a sitting position (which is funny). Having something that can do both is nice to have.
If I'm reading the correct spec for the 315-88 it's 7mm xmax. Then you don't think the 9mm of the Vifa 12 will be pose any real limitation for the needs I've described? If I could get some consensus on this I'll stick with this driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 06:11 AM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Depending on where in the world it was made and when, that might be Ash rather than Oak. Cheers if it is, great find.
I used a dead blow hammer and hardwood block to separate the cabinet today. All tongue in groove and dowel pinned. Fortunately all the glue was brittle enough to separate without taking any wood with it. There was a piano lesson book wedged in a bottom corner with the owner's name inside and dated June 1915. It's at least that old.

It is solid oak. Appears to have been a file for 12in 78s? There is a bar running along the back of the shelves that limits their depth to approx that of a record album. May be a bit of sacrilege to cut 4inches off of the height, but it doesn't have any markings describing its provenance or manufacture and I doubt that it's terribly valuable.

Maybe in another 100 years some dude will have it on the antiques roadshow and be told that it might have been worth big money if an obvious idiot around the turn of the century hadn't turned it into a loudspeaker. Oh well, I could get sentimental and change my mind.

Last edited by peace brainerd; 24th September 2011 at 06:14 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2011, 06:37 AM   #30
diyAudio Member
 
ßart West-VL.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Vlaanderen
Quote:
Originally Posted by revboden View Post
I should add that the box has dual ports, one port open tunes the box to ~14Hz, both open tunes the box to ~18Hz.

For background music i choke it down to 14Hz, for movies or music with more oomph open both ports. For classical I plug both ports and have a sealed cab with a Qtc of .512
Sounds interesting! Is the design on the forum?
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting finding: Driver orientation effects T/S parameters. ByronInLawrence Subwoofers 19 13th June 2011 01:20 AM
Driver orientation for T/S parameters Buzzy Subwoofers 2 7th May 2008 02:39 PM
Port And Driver Orientation? jpvt68 Subwoofers 7 7th April 2008 10:30 PM
Looking for a copy of Adireaudio's Driver Orientation pdf? TimA Subwoofers 3 2nd August 2007 12:02 PM
Isobaric driver orientation: which is best? Javaman Multi-Way 25 1st January 2002 12:20 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio