Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th November 2011, 01:45 PM   #21
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
Short story Srten, the folks that bought the sub just came from a Best buys, listened to everything they had. They heard the compact Iso box and wanted to take it home with them.
I didn't think you would get it, but do understand your post.

I really don't think it would work in a 1cf BR, do you?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 02:26 PM   #22
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

The short story is you don't get it. You have low tuned poorly designed
boomboxes and seem to like them and keep insisting that they are good.

They are not, that ISO box is design disaster area that could be greatly
improved upon. Yes I don't get convincing people they are on to a good
thing when I know there is actually a far better solution, and that I'm
fobbing them off with lazy, inappropriate, poor design. I don't care how
good you think it is. Designed properly it will be simply better.
And capable of 4 times the SPL at a cost of nothing.

So you've sold some people a nice looking box that looks like it should
work well but actually doesn't work half as well as it should or could.

Yes, I don't get it.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 02:39 PM   #23
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
Mr. Sreten,

Yeah, I'm miserable in my world without bass [NOT] But I'll tell you what...I'm a bachelor for the weekend, plenty of MDF on hand and extra woofers.
You have mentioned a double sided woofer(s) box a couple of times, that's not much to go on.
Are you saying a box similar:
1) What cf?
2) What tuning?
3) Woofers right and left sides, mag to mag?
4) Same long port?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 03:41 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I agree with Sreten, those want to be in very small boxes going isobaric is silly. I modeled four of them in a 1.3cf box tuned to 40hz, that would make a nice woofer if the HP was set to 60Hz. looks like that driver is made to be used in cars as the sealed design using two of them wants a box size ~.43cf for a Qtc of .587.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 04:17 PM   #25
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
The ISO box was a line of several experiments, wasn't looking to save space.

I'll build a new double woofer HT box in a jiff (you know I will). I'll post pics and descriptions accurately.

I have no devotion to ISO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 04:37 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
revboden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
This may be sacrilege...(i love BR) but I'm getting the best results with 2 of those in a sealed .6cf box with 500w and PEQ boost Fc=20Hz Q=.7 gain =6db.

edit: never mind, the motor can't handle that power... dang

sealed without boost is still better though

Last edited by revboden; 9th November 2011 at 04:58 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 04:53 PM   #27
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
Well I never did try a sealed box.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 07:56 PM   #28
ODougbo is offline ODougbo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
Sure got quiet in here.

What happened to the Simon Cowell fellow?

I thought there was going to be some pearls of wisdom by now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 08:25 PM   #29
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODougbo View Post

I really don't think it would work in a 1cf BR, do you?
Hi,

All the indications are two parallel in a 1cuft box tuned to around
30Hz would work, not the opposite, but venting instead of using
PR's would be pretty tricky, Flare-it - Free Speaker Design Software

All the modelling is in Silly's sub thread, around 12L each tuned to around 33Hz.

Dayton Audio SD270-PR 10" Passive Radiator 295-494
could work, weighted to between 400 to 500 grams I recall
in Silly's thread, one per driver in 10L to 14L per driver.

0.6cuft with two of them sealed with Bass EQ would work.

Another option is 10L to 12L with two Dayton 8" PRs.

If you want a "pearl of wisdom" its this, they are designed for small
boxes, and using bigger boxes than optimum does not help, it hinders,
if you did the modelling you would quickly realise this is the case.

As I said initially there is utterly no point using them isobaric.

There is nothing SC related in my comments. If you post stuff saying
its great when its plainly not right, there is nothing nasty in saying so.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 9th November 2011 at 08:29 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2011, 08:32 PM   #30
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODougbo View Post

I really don't think it would work in a 1cf BR, do you?
Hi,

All the indications are two parallel in a 1cuft box tuned to around
30Hz would work, not the opposite, but venting instead of using
PR's would be pretty tricky, Flare-it - Free Speaker Design Software

All the modelling is in Silly's sub thread, around 12L each tuned to around 33Hz.

Dayton Audio SD270-PR 10" Passive Radiator 295-494
could work, weighted to between 400 to 500 grams I recall
in Silly's threads, one per driver in 10L to 14L per driver.

0.6cuft with two of them sealed with Bass EQ would work.

Another option is 10L to 12L with two Dayton 8" PRs.
That would be a killer small sub, for small satellites.

If you want a "pearl of wisdom" its this, they are designed for small
boxes, and using bigger boxes than optimum does not help, it hinders.

There is nothing SC related in my comments. If you post stuff saying
its great when its plainly not right, there is nothing nasty in saying so.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MCM 55-2421 T/S Parameters and thoughts greg_mcquaid Subwoofers 9 11th March 2012 04:36 PM
Mcm 8" 55-2421 Ts parameter kornnylike Subwoofers 223 28th November 2011 08:04 PM
Silly's 1st Sub -- 8" MCM 55-2421 Sillyboy Subwoofers 18 6th July 2006 08:26 AM
Question regarding the MCM 8" Woofer (Part #55-2421) Phlim Subwoofers 2 2nd February 2006 10:46 PM
Looking for MCM 55-2421 Woofer lancer Parts 0 5th December 2004 05:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Page generated in 0.10570 seconds (81.24% PHP - 18.76% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio