|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
|
Short story Srten, the folks that bought the sub just came from a Best buys, listened to everything they had. They heard the compact Iso box and wanted to take it home with them.
I didn't think you would get it, but do understand your post. I really don't think it would work in a 1cf BR, do you? |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The short story is you don't get it. You have low tuned poorly designed boomboxes and seem to like them and keep insisting that they are good. They are not, that ISO box is design disaster area that could be greatly improved upon. Yes I don't get convincing people they are on to a good thing when I know there is actually a far better solution, and that I'm fobbing them off with lazy, inappropriate, poor design. I don't care how good you think it is. Designed properly it will be simply better. And capable of 4 times the SPL at a cost of nothing. So you've sold some people a nice looking box that looks like it should work well but actually doesn't work half as well as it should or could. Yes, I don't get it. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
|
Mr. Sreten,
Yeah, I'm miserable in my world without bass [NOT] But I'll tell you what...I'm a bachelor for the weekend, plenty of MDF on hand and extra woofers. You have mentioned a double sided woofer(s) box a couple of times, that's not much to go on. Are you saying a box similar: 1) What cf? 2) What tuning? 3) Woofers right and left sides, mag to mag? 4) Same long port? |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
I agree with Sreten, those want to be in very small boxes going isobaric is silly. I modeled four of them in a 1.3cf box tuned to 40hz, that would make a nice woofer if the HP was set to 60Hz. looks like that driver is made to be used in cars as the sealed design using two of them wants a box size ~.43cf for a Qtc of .587.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
|
The ISO box was a line of several experiments, wasn't looking to save space.
I'll build a new double woofer HT box in a jiff (you know I will). I'll post pics and descriptions accurately. I have no devotion to ISO. |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
This may be sacrilege...(i love BR) but I'm getting the best results with 2 of those in a sealed .6cf box with 500w and PEQ boost Fc=20Hz Q=.7 gain =6db.
edit: never mind, the motor can't handle that power... dang sealed without boost is still better though
Last edited by revboden; 9th November 2011 at 04:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
|
Well I never did try a sealed box.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland USA
|
Sure got quiet in here.
What happened to the Simon Cowell fellow? I thought there was going to be some pearls of wisdom by now. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
All the indications are two parallel in a 1cuft box tuned to around 30Hz would work, not the opposite, but venting instead of using PR's would be pretty tricky, Flare-it - Free Speaker Design Software All the modelling is in Silly's sub thread, around 12L each tuned to around 33Hz. Dayton Audio SD270-PR 10" Passive Radiator 295-494 could work, weighted to between 400 to 500 grams I recall in Silly's thread, one per driver in 10L to 14L per driver. 0.6cuft with two of them sealed with Bass EQ would work. Another option is 10L to 12L with two Dayton 8" PRs. If you want a "pearl of wisdom" its this, they are designed for small boxes, and using bigger boxes than optimum does not help, it hinders, if you did the modelling you would quickly realise this is the case. As I said initially there is utterly no point using them isobaric. There is nothing SC related in my comments. If you post stuff saying its great when its plainly not right, there is nothing nasty in saying so. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 9th November 2011 at 08:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
All the indications are two parallel in a 1cuft box tuned to around 30Hz would work, not the opposite, but venting instead of using PR's would be pretty tricky, Flare-it - Free Speaker Design Software All the modelling is in Silly's sub thread, around 12L each tuned to around 33Hz. Dayton Audio SD270-PR 10" Passive Radiator 295-494 could work, weighted to between 400 to 500 grams I recall in Silly's threads, one per driver in 10L to 14L per driver. 0.6cuft with two of them sealed with Bass EQ would work. Another option is 10L to 12L with two Dayton 8" PRs. That would be a killer small sub, for small satellites. If you want a "pearl of wisdom" its this, they are designed for small boxes, and using bigger boxes than optimum does not help, it hinders. There is nothing SC related in my comments. If you post stuff saying its great when its plainly not right, there is nothing nasty in saying so. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MCM 55-2421 T/S Parameters and thoughts | greg_mcquaid | Subwoofers | 9 | 11th March 2012 04:36 PM |
| Mcm 8" 55-2421 Ts parameter | kornnylike | Subwoofers | 223 | 28th November 2011 08:04 PM |
| Silly's 1st Sub -- 8" MCM 55-2421 | Sillyboy | Subwoofers | 18 | 6th July 2006 08:26 AM |
| Question regarding the MCM 8" Woofer (Part #55-2421) | Phlim | Subwoofers | 2 | 2nd February 2006 10:46 PM |
| Looking for MCM 55-2421 Woofer | lancer | Parts | 0 | 5th December 2004 05:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10570 seconds (81.24% PHP - 18.76% MySQL) with 11 queries |