|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
I've thought some about open baffle woofers, the most recent one is a single driver 15'' H-frame woofer to handle up to 200-300 hz. The preliminary driver is the Dipole15.
I wish to eliminate vibration though... so the idea is to suspend the speaker cone like a pendulum on a square baffle inside a H-frame: ![]() The big question now is would would work well as a normal H-frame? Would the small gap at the bottom and sides be a problem or is it negligible? I thought about suspending without the surrounding H-frame but according to Rudolf's nice PDF (no-baffle simulations in the end) would simply waste SPL, which if true I'd rather not do // Olle |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Think Newton's Third Law. A suspended woofer frame will recoil just as guns recoil when they fire. This is called dynamic compression. And if your hinge does not behave linearly with frequency, you will also have added distortion. In other words, the woofer maker's endeavors to linearize its spider and surround behavior will have gone to waste. You had best think of other solutions, like making the frame heavier, using a W-frame with two horizontal drivers, anchoring the frame to the floor, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
How about this.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sulawesi
|
The last idea is something to try, maybe you can found some rubber with a kind of "X" profile, normally intended to car doors.
The general idea of decoupling is nor bad too, because there is a real problem. For years I had H frames with 15", EQ flat till 25Hz. At these frequencies, they were emitting a noise that was "obviously" aerodynamic perturbations caused by the basket. Long time after, I discovered that this noise was simply suppressed with thick rubber pads under the cabinets (heavy ones, close to 40 kg). BIG surprise ! This means also that just decoupling the cabinet can be enough and far easier. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Hmm, interesting.
Since eliminating vibration of an H-frame without losing SQ seems to be as reachable as utopia I'm instead leaning towards the classic Phoenix W-frame instead. Thanks for the input! // Olle |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| H-frame woofer ? | pieskapov | Subwoofers | 8 | 31st December 2009 12:38 AM |
| PE Buyout 6" shielded AL cast frame woofer | AdamThorne | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th April 2008 11:28 PM |
| Omega frame woofer | Jaco Pastorius | Subwoofers | 5 | 4th March 2008 07:55 AM |
| U-frame woofer design | john k... | Multi-Way | 0 | 8th December 2006 05:15 PM |
| Dipole Woofer Array in Multiple W Frame? | MartinQ | Multi-Way | 9 | 3rd August 2004 09:20 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09204 seconds (74.91% PHP - 25.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |