|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
I'm building a couple of bass speakers using 12" Goodmans drivers from the old Magnum K speakers.
Each cabinet will use 2 pairs of the bass drivers, each pair connected 'Isobabaricly' front to front and then the 2 Isobaric couples connected together in a metal frame to cancel each other's vibrations. That way, I'll get double the cone area in a box not much bigger than the original Magnum. The drive units are inexpensive. Anyway, the speakrs were originally used in the normal vertical configuration and I'm planning on using them horizontally. Do you think this will cause problems with sagging cones, etc.? Thanks Steve |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
It would be a good idea to do some testing to see how your cones perform horizontally compared to vertically before committing to a design that requires horizontal loading. Also, check for vent and spider noises, some speakers make a lot of wheezing sounds off the back that are not heard in normal operation. This post showed that the Audio Concepts DV-12 was a "sagger": subwoofer testing orientation: Part II |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
I can't say how those particular drivers would respond, but I've been using a pair of peerless 850122 6.5" drivers face up in a sealed box for about 8 years now and haven't had sagging problems. When I put them together I made a referance mark on the inside of the routed-out area where they're mounted so I could keep track of it. I haven't seen any sagging, and don't expect any after that much time.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
The bigger the woofer, the heavier the cone, the more the sag, almost regardless of spider strength. I know there are formulas out there but I always think that if it is a HiFi unit don't do it unless it's 8" or less but if it's a PA type driver it might be ok due to the lightweight cone and stiff suspension. Just a practical non-technical way of looking at it.
Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Why don't you put each isobaric pair in the left and right of the subwoofer ? Cannot see any point at all for a top / bottom arrangement. FWIW also cannot see much point in the metal frame, L/R or F/B mounting will give you overall force cancellation via the box, which is essentially rigid / somewhat elastic at any sensible subwoofer frequencies. rgds, sreten. Given what happens to drivers over the years, its best to mark the vertical orientation, and then mount them all rotated through 180 degrees, it works.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 16th July 2011 at 09:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
I have tried vertical mounting with 6.5"/8" drivers (depending on where you measure them) without any problems. These drivers are larger though.
Quote:
Quote:
It's actually not much hassle to do the frame. I know that the metal frame will provide 'immediate' cancellation because of the rigidity and the acoustic coupling through the frame. I'm planning to mount the frame in the enclosures (top and bottom) via neoprine gaskets, which aren't so immediate and are more decoupled. However, I will give more thought to whether it's necessary or beneficial. Thanks Steve |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
|
steve ? is nonsuch in business ?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
|
I've got five freakin speakers in my house with saggy spiders.
Three of them are subwoofers. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
|
I'm sure we'd love your yapping over on the full range section here, or the fullrangedriver.com forum.
I'd never have subs facing up or down. Norman |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Onken bass box with 2 Eminence Deltalite ll 2510 10" bass drivers | albertli | Multi-Way | 35 | 11th May 2011 12:05 PM |
| Why no high efficiency bass drivers for sealed bass channel? | hasselbaink | Multi-Way | 48 | 19th October 2010 02:24 PM |
| Voice coil orientation for full range drivers | LostForWords | Full Range | 5 | 21st February 2010 07:45 PM |
| 21" Bass Drivers and Beyma Compression Drivers | Magnetar | Swap Meet | 0 | 19th November 2006 02:42 AM |
| Eminence bass drivers | andybrook | Car Audio | 3 | 25th February 2004 10:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12137 seconds (82.91% PHP - 17.09% MySQL) with 10 queries |