|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
What about compound loading vs this PP version , you guys ever compare before ...?
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
That said, separate chambers for each driver reduces distortion in any configuration. Push pull can reduce even order (the "good sounding" LOL) distortion, but does not decrease excursion, so I don't see it as offering an increase in the longevity of the driver. Although I'm all for reducing LF distortion, when distortion is lacking the tendency for many sound operators is to turn up the level, pushing the clean speakers harder than the louder sounding distorted speakers. Assuming the adhesives are not cooked out of the speaker, driver longevity is related to excursion, the harder the driver is pushed, the shorter the lifetime before the cone and spider wear out. It is common for speakers not pushed much beyond Xmax to last decades, but a speaker driven to Xlim may only last seconds. Last edited by weltersys; 1st July 2011 at 03:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
If by compound loading, you mean mounting the speakers in a plenum, sometimes called a slot, no what you see in the first four posts are what you get. A plenum works as a low pass filter, so it will reduce upper distortion products on PP or normal configurations. The purpose of my test was to determine the difference in distortion using PP vs normal loading. Adding a plenum as another variable would have required double the time, as it stands the test results took around 16 hours. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
compound loading as in one driver mounted behind the other no slot ..
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Tustin, SoCal
|
Quote:
Size concerns are just that- you can make smaller less efficient subs if portability is a concern, or skip the benefit of Push Pull. "Worth it" is a value proposition, nothing you can say "yes" or "no" to on someone else's behalf. Depends on how strong your back is or if you have a helper or or or...
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Didn't do that, either. A photo of the cabinet in normal and PP is in the first post. The tests were ported and sealed , PP and normal, 400 and 800 watts. The 800 watt tests were only done on the sealed cabinet, as 49 volt drive level may have exceeded the Lab 12's Xlim at 20 Hz in the ported cabinet. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Nice rock!
I've always found that PP does help but only when the drivers are pushed hard enough to reveal the asymmetry of the suspension. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Can't blame a guy for asking
![]() My Iso 15's in a WAF approved box (the reason behind the madness) works very well but I'm moving towards horns. I do prefer to use push-pull in tapped horns to even out the frequency response and hoped I could gain a little more stability--guess not. My back can handle dual-woofers but if I can get the same thing with two boxes, my back is not getting any younger. Thanks for the information again and it looks like I'll be modeling push/pull VS two boxes and figure it out from there. I'm leaning towards two boxes for ease of moving, more flexibility for placement etc. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Push pull in TH is a different animal than in FLH, check out Josh Ricci’s DataBass tests on his new Gjallerhorn compared to a DTS-10 before you make assumptions that dual drivers even out the frequency response or PP lowers distortion. As far as your back, if you are not actually lifting cabinets, just rolling them around, one large box is more convenient than two smaller boxes, and overall weighs less. That said, my Keystone sub (double the size of the dual Lab 12s tested here) is as big a cabinet as I want to deal with, I'll leave the Gjallerhorn, 12Pi, LABsub etc. to those with crew. Art Welter |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Push-Pull" for push und "Push-Pull" for pull (like Gamnut) - whats the right name? | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 70 | 15th August 2012 08:08 PM |
| Push-Pull vs Push-Pull-Parallel | rsumperl | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 10th July 2012 05:34 PM |
| Yet another Push-Pull | croccodillo | Solid State | 3 | 2nd October 2009 12:24 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |