Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd June 2011, 04:53 AM   #1
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Default To David McBean: question re path length difference

David , in the attached diagram should the path length from the rear of the speaker include the internal length of the rear
part of the H frame, ie the length from the speaker cone back to the open rear of the H frame? Thanks for any help.
Mike, jamikl
Attached Images
File Type: gif H baffle idea.gif (9.8 KB, 68 views)

Last edited by jamikl; 23rd June 2011 at 04:56 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2011, 06:39 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamikl View Post
David , in the attached diagram should the path length from the rear of the speaker include the internal length of the rear
part of the H frame, ie the length from the speaker cone back to the open rear of the H frame? Thanks for any help.
Mike, jamikl
Hi Mike,

I'm not exactly sure how to interpret your diagram, but when you model the system in Hornresp the message that appears when the Combined Response tool is selected should help to clarify how the path length difference parameter value should be determined.

I think that the answer to your question may be "no", but I can't be certain without better understanding the system you are considering.

If you care to post a screenprint of the Hornresp schematic for your design, I might be able to provide a more definitive answer :-).

Kind regards,

David
__________________
www.hornresp.net.ms
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2011, 09:14 AM   #3
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Hi David, thanks for your interest. The speaker is open baffle at the rear so I have modelled the open rear as a port equal area to the box cross section but very very short length. This was modelled using 2 x Eminence Beta 15 which would normally require a very large box but the results here if it works look very promising. It is not really horn loaded but uses the air load of the horn to drop the resonance frequency down to about 18 - 20Hz. Schematic from horn response attached.
Mike. jamikl
Attached Images
File Type: gif Schem Diagram.gif (18.6 KB, 58 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2011, 07:14 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamikl View Post
The speaker is open baffle at the rear so I have modelled the open rear as a port equal area to the box cross section but very very short length. Schematic from horn response attached.
Hi Mike,

Thanks for the schematic - now I understand :-).

Differences in front / rear acoustic path lengths within the loudspeaker system are automatically taken into account by Hornresp. Path length differences external to the system must be specified by the user.

By default Hornresp assumes that the two sound outputs leaving the system are equidistant from the nominal listening position and that the path length difference is therefore zero. If this is not actually the case, then the user has to specify the difference value.

To answer your original question - yes, the path length does includes the distance from the speaker cone back to the open rear of the H frame, but this is automatically taken into account by Hornresp.

It would only be necessary to specify a path length difference value if the distance from the port outlet to the listener is different to the distance from the horn mouth to the listener.

Kind regards,

David
__________________
www.hornresp.net.ms
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2011, 09:24 AM   #5
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Thanks for the reply David. The object is to get the rear path and the group delay working with the front path rather than cancelling it as in a normal dipole.
jamikl
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2011, 10:48 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
revintage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
How does it sim?
__________________
Brgds
Lars
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TH path length opinion needed NEO Dan Subwoofers 5 10th February 2010 01:27 PM
Vent length question DAMIC Multi-Way 4 20th September 2006 05:53 AM
Rf path length considerations eddog Chip Amps 3 2nd May 2006 03:07 PM
Port length question masterp2 Multi-Way 40 12th February 2003 02:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.08134 seconds (80.34% PHP - 19.66% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio