|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
|
There is apparently some confusion over these terms. If I place drivers on opposite sides of enclosure and wire them out of phase, what do I have. Simple minds want to know. Is it a good idea and does it have any advantages over standard both drivers in phase. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
|
If you were to take two drivers wired out of phase on opposing sides of an enclosure you would get what is called an acoustic short circuit. There is another term that eludes me...You will get bass cancelation, as one driver moves forward creating a positive pressure wave, at the same time there will be negative wave at the rear......the net effect.......one driver will suck the life out of bass frequencies, nulling the output. The particular frequency will vary according to a host of variables, one being the distance one driver to the other.
Placing two drivers face to face on a single faceplate with one wired out of phase is the Isobaric Push-Pull. A pocket of air resides between the two drivers, the net effect is an improvement in non-linearities, and an enclosure that can be one-half size. __________________________________________________ _______Rick........ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
|
I ate the ice cream while thinking about this conumdrum. It seems to me that the driver moving back would re-inforce the driver moving out. Am I getting dottery in my old age? In phase the drivers would compress the air in the box, and moving out of phase there would be no compression. Would someone chime in who knows what is going on here and if my reasoning is correct or faulty. Regards
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
|
If the two drivers are in phase moving together there is still the "Air-Spring" as in a sealed system.....the air inside serving to damp out the resonant frequencies as per the "Air Suspension" type...designing the system....with all the math implied.
Out of phase a driver will see no Air-Spring and will likely move the cone farther than it should (without the damping) damaging it & sounding just plain bad. __________________________________________________ _____Rick........ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
If you wired two drivers out of phase and mounted one on the front and other on the back--I figure it would act like a single driver on an open baffle. Would it sound better or worse than a dipole open baffle? They are coupled together in push-pull but...
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Consider the acoustic phase of the driver. If they are the same, you have a bipole. If they aren't you have a dipole.
As described by the OP, if both drivers are face out (magnets nside the box), a bipole, if one driver is face-in, a bipole. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
|
I'll take a stab at this...why not?
If the drivers are wired out of phase and closely coupled, you'll probably get a bit less distortion. If they're on opposite sides of an enclosure they operate in a dipole fashion and there will be a null at an angle of around 90 degrees to the cabinet. OTOH, If they were wired in-phase and mounted on opposite sides, you'd have a Bi-pole and the enclosure would need twice the volume of what a single driver would need. BTW, in a di-pole configuration I believe the enclose would only need the displacement needed for a single driver, plus whatever the volume that is actually displaced by the second driver. I'm probably wrong, but that's my take. Best Regards, TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track." quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
So if you put a woofer on the front, a woofer in the back out of phase it would require the space of one woofer. The remaining two sides can be used for passive radiators to make a .... mess?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
|
Quote:
![]() Best Regards, TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track." quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossing bipole/dipole? | theAnonymous1 | Multi-Way | 4 | 27th November 2009 05:36 PM |
| Bipole/Dipole, + TQWT? | Sylver300B | Full Range | 14 | 22nd October 2009 10:31 PM |
| Bipole, Dipole, and Chilliapedes | charliemouse | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th July 2007 05:39 PM |
| Bipole into Dipole? | Howard | Multi-Way | 1 | 30th January 2005 05:31 PM |
| which is better for rears in H/T dipole -bipole | busterno1 | Multi-Way | 0 | 16th January 2004 11:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14089 seconds (67.82% PHP - 32.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |