Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th April 2011, 11:20 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
Default Bipole,dipole, we all scream for two drivers

There is apparently some confusion over these terms. If I place drivers on opposite sides of enclosure and wire them out of phase, what do I have. Simple minds want to know. Is it a good idea and does it have any advantages over standard both drivers in phase. Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2011, 11:30 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
Where's the ice cream?

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2011, 11:38 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Richard Ellis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
If you were to take two drivers wired out of phase on opposing sides of an enclosure you would get what is called an acoustic short circuit. There is another term that eludes me...You will get bass cancelation, as one driver moves forward creating a positive pressure wave, at the same time there will be negative wave at the rear......the net effect.......one driver will suck the life out of bass frequencies, nulling the output. The particular frequency will vary according to a host of variables, one being the distance one driver to the other.
Placing two drivers face to face on a single faceplate with one wired out of phase is the Isobaric Push-Pull. A pocket of air resides between the two drivers, the net effect is an improvement in non-linearities, and an enclosure that can be one-half size.

__________________________________________________ _______Rick........
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2011, 11:53 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
I ate the ice cream while thinking about this conumdrum. It seems to me that the driver moving back would re-inforce the driver moving out. Am I getting dottery in my old age? In phase the drivers would compress the air in the box, and moving out of phase there would be no compression. Would someone chime in who knows what is going on here and if my reasoning is correct or faulty. Regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 12:08 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Richard Ellis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
If the two drivers are in phase moving together there is still the "Air-Spring" as in a sealed system.....the air inside serving to damp out the resonant frequencies as per the "Air Suspension" type...designing the system....with all the math implied.
Out of phase a driver will see no Air-Spring and will likely move the cone farther than it should (without the damping) damaging it & sounding just plain bad.

__________________________________________________ _____Rick........
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 01:05 AM   #6
18Hurts is offline 18Hurts  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
If you wired two drivers out of phase and mounted one on the front and other on the back--I figure it would act like a single driver on an open baffle. Would it sound better or worse than a dipole open baffle? They are coupled together in push-pull but...
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 04:08 AM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Consider the acoustic phase of the driver. If they are the same, you have a bipole. If they aren't you have a dipole.

As described by the OP, if both drivers are face out (magnets nside the box), a bipole, if one driver is face-in, a bipole.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 04:25 AM   #8
TerryO is offline TerryO  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TerryO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
I'll take a stab at this...why not?
If the drivers are wired out of phase and closely coupled, you'll probably get a bit less distortion. If they're on opposite sides of an enclosure they operate in a dipole fashion and there will be a null at an angle of around 90 degrees to the cabinet. OTOH, If they were wired in-phase and mounted on opposite sides, you'd have a Bi-pole and the enclosure would need twice the volume of what a single driver would need. BTW, in a di-pole configuration I believe the enclose would only need the displacement needed for a single driver, plus whatever the volume that is actually displaced by the second driver.

I'm probably wrong, but that's my take.

Best Regards,
TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track."
quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 04:39 AM   #9
18Hurts is offline 18Hurts  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
So if you put a woofer on the front, a woofer in the back out of phase it would require the space of one woofer. The remaining two sides can be used for passive radiators to make a .... mess?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2011, 05:11 AM   #10
TerryO is offline TerryO  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TerryO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Hurts View Post
So if you put a woofer on the front, a woofer in the back out of phase it would require the space of one woofer. The remaining two sides can be used for passive radiators to make a .... mess?
If the two driver are moving the same volume of air in a push-pull configuration, I'm not sure that a Passive radiator would work at all. But, just the same, every time I start to feel that I've got a handle on all this stuff, someone comes along.....

Best Regards,
TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track."
quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossing bipole/dipole? theAnonymous1 Multi-Way 4 27th November 2009 05:36 PM
Bipole/Dipole, + TQWT? Sylver300B Full Range 14 22nd October 2009 10:31 PM
Bipole, Dipole, and Chilliapedes charliemouse Multi-Way 5 5th July 2007 05:39 PM
Bipole into Dipole? Howard Multi-Way 1 30th January 2005 05:31 PM
which is better for rears in H/T dipole -bipole busterno1 Multi-Way 0 16th January 2004 11:33 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Page generated in 0.14089 seconds (67.82% PHP - 32.18% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio