|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
While reading "Loudspeaker design cookbook" by Vance Dickason, I came across following " traditionaly enclosure damping, to suppress standing waves in a vented-box system, consists of lining one of each opposite side with 1"-2" of fiberglass. It is recommended, however, that you cover all surfaces directly behind, and adjacent to, woofer. Colloms recommends that such damping material be placed with the volume or open area, not on the box walls. "
Does the author mean to say, the damping material should be stuffed like that of closed enclosure design. taking care that vent is not obstructed? That is not just lining the walls of vented enclosure.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wellington
|
He means, if you're going to use 1 or 2 inch thick material, hang it in the middle of the box instead of against the walls. I't'll be more effective. Note that you can fill the whole box if you want to, just leave a bit of space around the port mouth. Several box modeller programs such as Unibox allow using damping material in the enclosure design.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
Thank you Don and chris.
Chris EPS site is my important bookmark. It had always been a big source of knowledge. Do you know any site which discuss deep about this with some calculation. With random surfing, I could understand that, because the stuffing absorbs sound and minimizes reflecting it back avoiding standing waves, this makes it look like a bigger enclosure. but the physical volume of enclosure gets smaller, so the compression ratio changes. But mathematically how can this be related and calculated just don't know.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
In actuality the biggest problems with sub enclosures is inadequate panel bracing. Lack of sufficient panel bracing allows LF resonances to build up within the enclosure and this is what many refer to as a sub having a boomy character.
Most sub enclosures are just not big enough to allow standing waves of LF to build up, given the wavelength of low frequencies Fiberglass, Dacron, carpet, etc have virtually no effect on controlling or reducing low frequencies, although they do help somewhat in controlling upper harmonics of the LF content. You might be surprised to learn that many of the best sounding ported subs have very little to no stuffing/lining but are extremely well engineered to be very "dead" resonance wise by using panel bracing and double panel thickness with a constraining layer between the two panels. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
Thanks Coke...
Hey is it really that big gray area, only one reply..?
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
The only thing that stuffing a ported enclosure does is it helps a bit with absorption, (Qa in WinISD) to lower the Q of a undersized(high Q) enclosure - stuffing/lining really has very little to no effect on controlling any standing waves within a enclosure.
If you are concerned(and you should not be with sub enclosures) about standing waves simply make sure no two inner surfaces of the enclosure are completely parallel to each other, that way wave frequencies inside the enclosure can never build and form a standing wave. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: home
|
Damping inside a bassreflex has the same effect as a muffler to a exhaust-system, it reduces the soundlevel and ruins soundquality. The right way to go would be to look at 1/4 wave horns or do like I`ve done; asymetric cabinet w. diffractors + aerodynamic ports pointing forward paralell w. floor.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The need for Acoustic Absorbent material is relevent for a typical bass reflex design where the crossovers for a 3 way system are typically 700 & 5K Hz. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
you mean Acoustic absorbent material is not needed when you are working with subwoofer that is crossing at 160Hz. did I get you right?
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| In Bass reflex box (vented)-If I make smaller box than what consequences will I have? | eliaselias_0 | Multi-Way | 6 | 3rd January 2011 03:49 PM |
| thielsmall in vented box. | jayam000 | Multi-Way | 4 | 6th February 2010 05:00 PM |
| Can I mod an old labriynth box to be a vented box? | MikeHunt79 | Subwoofers | 7 | 23rd May 2006 06:44 PM |
| Closed box sub in vented box ? | MadMax | Multi-Way | 3 | 17th May 2003 12:24 AM |
| Vented box alignments | Vg | Multi-Way | 7 | 26th May 2002 09:18 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |