|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Anyone has tryed to make it?? any good suggestions??
2x4ohm drivers in serial was my idea!! Thanks a lot Alex |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
Search PPSL, djk
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g1...CoePA-2009.jpg M&K did a common back volume with the drivers on adjacent sides of the box, it got distortion cancellation, but only in the bottom octave. ![]() http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...KbyW2DtXz8&t=1 Old Audio Pro Ace bass from the late 70s: http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...jLIBPiNCUg&t=1
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. Last edited by djk; 5th February 2011 at 01:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
Never built it, but think there has since been products or kits designed to be positioned behind a couch or hung by wires overhead. I think Bose even makes something like that now. System Services, Inc. Las Vegas * Nevada (702) 493 - 1163 ![]() I purchased a M&K MX-90 push pull subwoofer back in 1994 and still use it. It is a sound design and I've always liked the concept as well as the sound. Martin Logan / now Paradigm subwoofer uses an interesting layout too. Martin Logan Descent i & Depth i Subs - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com
__________________
Tubes and Martin Logan's |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Don't know if 'serializing' two drivers instead of 'paralleling' them might be worse . If they are also mechanically cross-connected ,like in isobaric p-p ,currents in the VCs would be also 'equalized' due to backEMF and mutual pistonic movement . If the two VCs are not perfectly equal ,one speaker may have slightly different 'activation' time ,so it may be a 'load' for the more efficient one. Am I clear
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
This may be a bit obvious... Steve's Compounded, Super-Duper Shiva/Sonotube(R) T-line Subwoofers
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Loudspeaker drivers in push-pull | StigErik | Multi-Way | 3 | 24th March 2010 12:08 PM |
| Push-Pull drivers for array? | ted4412wilt | Multi-Way | 1 | 26th January 2009 03:27 PM |
| Building push-pull subwoofers | Klook | Subwoofers | 50 | 23rd March 2008 09:37 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| Parallel Push Pull Drivers | gingertube | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 13th May 2005 01:32 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10276 seconds (76.03% PHP - 23.97% MySQL) with 10 queries |