|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello,
I recently purchased a single Titanic MK3 15" sub, Dayton 1000w plate amp with parametric EQ, and a pair of Precision Port 4" ports. I need some help modeling the best tradeoff between size and performance in a BR enclosure. My listening room is pretty large as it spreads out into the kitchen and dining, probably half of my floorspace of a 1900sqft house. I was looking at a few other threads and saw about 6cuft was a god tradeoff but they didn't go into porting for this size. I was thinking about making an 18"x18"x35" external dimension box using 1.5" MDF. That should be pretty close to the volume I need, I think. Any help with adjustments to this size and of course porting using what I have on hand would be appreciated. Just out of curiosity, what could I expect using a 16" internal dimension sealed cube with this sub and plate amp? Could it be EQ'd enough to get the bottom end below 30hz? Thanks for your help! Jeff |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Hi there,
I did a quick model for you, with the dimensions you choose and wood thickness you are only getting around 4 cubic feet, not good for a ported design with this driver. A 16" cube with 1.5" wall thickness is only 1.5 cubic feet, very small for a 15" driver, 8 cubic feet tuned to 23Hz looks pretty nice, you will need a HPF @20Hz and 3 four inch ports to keep port air speed down. .75" walls will be ok as long as its well braced, maybe a 20" cube sealed might be a nice trade off, but i would make room for ported if i were you. Orange is 8 cubic feet. Grey is 4 cubic feet. Yellow is 1.5 cubic feet. HPF at 20Hz on both ported subs. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
A sealed enclosure would IMO be a good choice and of course a T-TQWT too. b |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I am having a hard time reading that pic, the resolution is poor on sizing it up. Can you give me the dimensions of the TWQT as well as driver placement and anticipated stuffing? I think I read on your picture that it tunes around 19hz at Fb? What about using this woofer in an H frame open baffle? Can it work well? I recently listen to my first OB setup a few days ago at Danny Richy's place and the bass from the OB os truly amazing. Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
First: Try to open the pictures in another window, click on the thumbnails,click on the lower left corner to magnify the pictures. You can use the Titanic in a H frame OB but the possible SPL for sub frequencies would be far lower if compared. Agree that OB-bass sounds good but compared with what? If you play an OB speaker just below x-max and compare using the same driver in a T-TQWT equalized to copy the OB FR and levels , you will find the latter to have almost benign IMD/THD while the OB by definition would have at least 10% THD and much higher levels of IMD colorations. You can look at the level differences in your next thread where I show a H-frame template simulation using the titanic driver. b b |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
18"x18"x35" (internal or external with ? Thick material??) driver centered on bottom part of enclosure with vertical center at 10" What about stuffing and where? Thanks, Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
[QUOTE=jmillerdoc;2455076]
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ultimate Polyfill Subwoofer Enclosure Resource - AudioJunkies b |
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks, perfect.....not sure why I can't get those pics to show as sharp as you, maybe it's my old failing eyes. I can see most everything but the "8's" are hard to be sure.
Anyways, thanks...that enclosure is sealed or open somewhere? Didn't see where the ports would be called for, maybe I am not looking hard enough. It's not too big and that's good, didn't want a monster of a piece of furniture the wife would fuss about. Thanks again for your help. Jeff |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Oh, I see now at the very top....closed transmission line enclosure.....
Thanks, Jeff |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
b |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dayton Titanic MkIII 15" sub bottom out | chainenoble | Subwoofers | 18 | 13th December 2010 04:59 PM |
| HELP- Titanic MKIII 12"+Plate Dayton 500W | lascur | Subwoofers | 8 | 2nd December 2008 03:53 PM |
| Dual 15" Dayton Titanic MKIII Design Help | chance_11 | Subwoofers | 25 | 3rd February 2006 07:46 AM |
| My first DIY project. The 15" Dayton Titanic MKIII. Pics | perpetual | Subwoofers | 11 | 18th April 2005 03:56 AM |
| Enclosure for 15" Dayton Titanic | ihearyou | Multi-Way | 3 | 19th December 2003 12:12 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14877 seconds (71.93% PHP - 28.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |