Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th December 2010, 01:58 AM   #1
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default the 4th order is it correct?

hi all

i find this box, they tell 4th order i see the 2 port very bid in the front of this box. the specs use 18" driver. it make me surprise that why i can see the driver inside in the same line level. i want to know is it bandpass or bypass sub. i think it can bypass the high freq to outside. is it correct design?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p0000006.jpg (100.7 KB, 286 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2010, 10:29 AM   #2
epa is offline epa  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: amsterdam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thawach View Post
hi all

i find this box, they tell 4th order i see the 2 port very bid in the front of this box. the specs use 18" driver. it make me surprise that why i can see the driver inside in the same line level. i want to know is it bandpass or bypass sub. i think it can bypass the high freq to outside. is it correct design?
looking @ the pic i say its a 4th order bandpass with the driver reversed(propably to make the box less deep)
and yes you can always filter it outside the box.
Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2010, 10:06 PM   #3
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
i try to see somewhere that the port location's in front of the drivers. they have a little to design. i consider that if the port like this. the pressure of the air will drop very fast and may not has the deep bass. ok i'll not design like this

__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th January 2011, 08:36 PM   #4
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
friends a bit problem when i see this sub. it seems like bp6. but why behind the subwoofer they design like the horn but outside it has the port. i want to know the design can increase the spl output?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg this design.jpg (165.4 KB, 172 views)
__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2011, 05:01 PM   #5
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
surprise again! this box seems like bp4. i think why people like to build it. i simulate with HR und win isd. the respond freq seems peak a lot at the upper bass. all friends i want a lot of ur comments about this respond.thank u
Attached Images
File Type: jpg t1texture.jpg (85.3 KB, 118 views)
File Type: jpg dscn0254.jpg (125.8 KB, 111 views)
File Type: jpg KT res.jpg (124.1 KB, 39 views)
__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2011, 05:02 PM   #6
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
and with HR
Attached Images
File Type: jpg KT II res.jpg (41.3 KB, 36 views)
__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2011, 06:34 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
that response doesn't look very good....
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2011, 03:24 AM   #8
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by m R g S r View Post
that response doesn't look very good....
i considered a long time why they still build it. i try to see the EAW sb1000 when it does not unprocess. still likes the upper bass freq region but when low respond freq. i see the graph EAW sb1000 better than very much.

i see from this specs sheet
EAW specs sheet
__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2011, 03:55 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
yeah thats what i meant, the lower frequency response
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2011, 07:42 PM   #10
Thawach is offline Thawach  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Thawach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
from this graph i guess that they only want the upper bass to throw away. it's possible that i think. or only want the sound of kick drum bass more than low. but again i think they use EQ to boost the low likes EAW do with EQ processor.
__________________
*out of the past=out of the future=in the present time+ing*
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LR 4th order vs LR 8th order crossover redliner Subwoofers 1 7th January 2009 11:32 PM
My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? philipreji Solid State 61 1st March 2007 04:50 PM
4th Order Bandpass Help berserker Subwoofers 9 19th January 2007 03:56 PM
4th order bandpass 4 way the phantom Multi-Way 3 27th July 2005 06:28 AM
4th order Subwoofer Ilianh Subwoofers 18 3rd November 2002 03:33 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Page generated in 0.10154 seconds (80.92% PHP - 19.08% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio