|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Because of the shape of the sub I am making (kind of a shallow spherical shape, like a UFO).
I have a choice of upwards on downwards firing only. There will be plenty of space underneath if the woofer is firing downwards but I'm thinking that because its a sealed unit, will it need to face upwards to get bass support from the floor? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
You will probably find that facing the sub upwards will give a particularly clean sound, though you will get more thump facing it down. I have done this several times myself, and I like upward facing - just be mindful that the woofer will collect dust.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Thanks for your answer. I was leaning towards upwards facing and I will try and make some kind of 'lens' above the woofer to reflect the sound and also act as a dust cover.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
I forgot to mention that the distance from sub(s) to back wall will be about 1.5 feet.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Don't bother with any kind of lens unless you are crossing it over really high.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
Either or will work, I have used both. You get floor reinforcement either way (wavelengths are huge relative to the enclosure height), there are only minimal differences in wave performance, but upfiring gives more delay but less destructive interference to distortion artifacts. No reasonable lens will do anything for directionality at these frequencies but could be used to prevent dust/look cool.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I find it fun to watch the dust etc dance around on the cone.
Still, a reflector thingy could look cool.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Ya'll seem to be forgetting the most important consideration........is the driver's specs suitable for up/down firing?
http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/DriverOrientation.pdf GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
I had been working on the assumption that the subwoofer was to be installed on the international space station, rendering GM's point moot.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Quote:
I'm wanting to use the HiVi M8a. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Face to face with the devils's - | tomtt | The Lounge | 10 | 14th June 2011 08:29 PM |
| Driver for sealed box | rho | Multi-Way | 13 | 13th November 2007 05:57 AM |
| dual driver sealed sub example | gwgjr31 | Subwoofers | 2 | 1st May 2006 07:03 AM |
| Sealed Enclosure Driver | Madmike2 | Subwoofers | 2 | 19th May 2005 12:53 AM |
| sub driver for best sealed performance? | needtubes | Subwoofers | 51 | 24th September 2004 06:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09863 seconds (78.80% PHP - 21.20% MySQL) with 10 queries |