|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Does anyone know of a currently-sold woofer with 0.3 > Qes > 0.2 and Qms about 30 times Qes? I need this type of woofer to test a bass extending network.
I've had some success with Pioneer DVC 8" B20FU20-52D with Qes =0.23 and Qms= 4.05. My calculations show that a higher Qms/ Qes ratio will improve the amount of extension possible. The size of the woofer at this point isn't of concern to me, but I would like to limit the unit cost to maybe $60. or less because I'm not absolutely certain that I can achieve success with it. A woofer that fits the bill that I can't locate is Pioneer 6-1/2" woofer C16LU20-51F. This woofer has Qes = 0.23 and Qms = 7.63, so Qms/ Qes = 33. I don't think that it would be easy to modify a woofer to obtain a higher Qms. Any help is appreciated, Pete |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
|
Doesn't adding extra mass increase Qms??
I have added extra mass to lower Fs, at the expense of lower SPL so need to increase the number of woofers
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Added mass increases Qes as well as Qms to the same degree. That is, adding mass doesn't change Qms/Qes. Ron E and I think others have posted replies here explaining this.
-Pete |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Quote:
The selection is slim with a $60 price limit. MCM Audio Select 8'' High Excursion Woofer - 120W RMS 4ohm | 55-2421 (552421) | MCM Audio Select ..................................Blake |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
That MCM55-2421 looks to be very similar if not identical to the Tang Band W8-740P. I bought and tested the Tang Band and was disappointed to find maximum impedance at free air resonance Fs much lower than it should be. That is,
Zmax = (Qms*Re/Qes) + Re. If you want to see what Ron E had to say about adding mass, look at the thread entitled "altering T/S parameters?" at diyaudio.com. Thanks, Pete |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| woofer with high Qms/Qes | MCPete | Multi-Way | 7 | 25th November 2010 08:19 PM |
| Qts Qes Qms WTF? | scampo77 | Subwoofers | 15 | 6th August 2010 01:24 AM |
| QES, QTS, QMS values for Hiquipon Ow1 | lovitz | Multi-Way | 1 | 20th January 2006 10:50 AM |
| Woofer with high Qms | Bill Fitzpatrick | Subwoofers | 13 | 10th November 2004 09:05 AM |
| Does Qms, Qes, and Qts explain a driver? | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 27 | 21st February 2004 04:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08377 seconds (76.34% PHP - 23.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |