Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th December 2010, 02:26 PM   #21
JLH is offline JLH  United States
diyAudio Member
 
JLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
You can't easily use a passive crossover with a tapped horn. I've gone around and around with this using Akabak software. Unlike Hornresponse, Akabak has a means to simulate passive crossover components. The passive components mess up the electro-mechanical tuning of the tapped horn. The best route is to use an active crossover in front of the amplifier.

In addition, the T/S parameters for the MCM 8" are all over the place. They also change quite a bit after break-in. The suspension gets sloppy on these, so Cms changes a lot. To save you some trouble, give those MCM 8's a good break-in period and then measure the T/S parameters yourself. This will give your project the best chance for success.
__________________
Ah, how beautifully the orchestra sounds before a rain! In a dry sunny day there is no way for the instruments to sound this way!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010, 03:25 PM   #22
jbell is offline jbell  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: .
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLH View Post
In addition, the T/S parameters for the MCM 8" are all over the place. They also change quite a bit after break-in. The suspension gets sloppy on these, so Cms changes a lot.
I second that motion... been there, done that. The best place for a MCM is a small sealed in car, or in a front loaded horn for PA with a very small sealed rear chamber. The small rear chamber helps control excursion, and consequently helps preserve the spider.

You want something that can hit 120db in car, you kinda need a 'car pa' style for your mcm's. In other words -- a PA FLH style cab with a sloping response, so in car it's flat.

my 2c.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 55-2421flh-car.JPG (59.4 KB, 113 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010, 08:25 PM   #23
mwmkravchenko is offline mwmkravchenko  Canada
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Bern you have the attention of all the big guns, jbell, JLH and even tb46. How do you do it?

Mark
__________________
Mark
www.kravchenko-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 05:59 PM   #24
littlemike is offline littlemike  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blamus View Post
ok cool, so eq works just the same way as with sealed boxes. And when I add a coil, I'd also have to add the resistance.

Now that brings me to wonder, if I was to use a passive high pass filter - as with most of these bass horns a HP is needed - at say, 30Hz, would the caps and coils do anything unexpected to the response? Or would it just apply the designed high pass effect just the same way as it would if used on a sealed box?

That might be a stupid question with a simple answer, but I have to ask, since horns are sooooo different than a sealed box, and I have never used a horn before.
I have measured the effect of a series inductor on a Tang Band W6-1139 tapped horn. It does not behave exactly like a passive crossover per se.

The effect was nearly exactly what the model shows us, the peaks in the passband that correspond to the excursion minimas were damped somewhat, the saddle (excursion maxima) remained unchanged, except for the attenuation due to the additional series resistance.

You only need a single inductor, wire it in series with the drivers. As far as a high-pass, active is a much better idea, the coils and caps involved get rather unwieldy and extremely expensive if you want to have a slope that might actually protect your driver at the end of the day.

Last edited by littlemike; 12th December 2010 at 06:02 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 06:00 PM   #25
mwmkravchenko is offline mwmkravchenko  Canada
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
dang forgot littleMike.

You are probably 6'2" 240lbs Mike!

Mark
__________________
Mark
www.kravchenko-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 06:09 PM   #26
littlemike is offline littlemike  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwmkravchenko View Post
dang forgot littleMike.

You are probably 6'2" 240lbs Mike!

Mark
Close....6'1". You nailed the 240 part though....

While we're about the same size, Big Mike is a retired Marine. No one there was gonna call him "Old Mike", so he got "Big Mike". I got "Little Mike". My bosses are really creative when it comes to nicknames.

Problem is - we hired another Mike a while back....and he's littler than me - so what do we call him???
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 06:14 PM   #27
mwmkravchenko is offline mwmkravchenko  Canada
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
LOL

I was once in a class in high school where there were 4 Mark's. I was Gus!

I'm close 6', 206lbs lost a whack load since the spring. Never looked back since. Was 238. Happy at 206!

Do you have any actual measurements for the MCM 8" drivers? I would love to simulate using the correct specs. I might get me a bunch of them.

Mark
__________________
Mark
www.kravchenko-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 06:57 PM   #28
littlemike is offline littlemike  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Here's what I measured when I did the HornResp Tapped Horn tutorial example build. It has been a little while since I measured these, but they are similar to what I have measured in the past.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 55-2421 specs.pdf (19.4 KB, 23 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010, 06:59 PM   #29
mwmkravchenko is offline mwmkravchenko  Canada
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?
Thank's Mike. Muchly appreciated.

Inside today with a bad cold. I'm supposed to be building some tapped horns and FLH subs!

Oh well.

Mark
__________________
Mark
www.kravchenko-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2010, 03:59 AM   #30
blamus is offline blamus  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default TS

Here's my effort - this is before break in.

How do they look?


1

* This data was exported from the Dayton Audio WT3 Woofer Tester
*
* Manufacturer:
* Model:
* Piston Diameter = 161.9 mm
* f(s)= 28.94 Hz
* R(e)= 3.38 Ohms
* Z(max)= 193.70 Ohms
* Q(ms)= 12.370
* Q(es)= 0.219
* Q(ts)= 0.216
* V(as)= 31.240 liters (1.103 cubic feet)
* L(e)= 2.67 mH
* n(0)= 0.33 %
* SPL= 87.27 1W/1m
* M(ms)= 57.64 grams
* C(ms)= 0.52 mm/N
* BL= 12.70
*


2
* Manufacturer:
* Model:
* Piston Diameter = 161.9 mm
* f(s)= 28.94 Hz
* R(e)= 3.33 Ohms
* Z(max)= 179.30 Ohms
* Q(ms)= 11.480
* Q(es)= 0.217
* Q(ts)= 0.213
* V(as)= 31.400 liters (1.109 cubic feet)
* L(e)= 2.63 mH
* n(0)= 0.33 %
* SPL= 87.34 1W/1m
* M(ms)= 57.36 grams
* C(ms)= 0.53 mm/N
* BL= 12.64
*


3
* Manufacturer:
* Model:
* Piston Diameter = 161.9 mm
* f(s)= 29.61 Hz
* R(e)= 3.31 Ohms
* Z(max)= 187.10 Ohms
* Q(ms)= 12.500
* Q(es)= 0.225
* Q(ts)= 0.221
* V(as)= 32.240 liters (1.139 cubic feet)
* L(e)= 2.63 mH
* n(0)= 0.35 %
* SPL= 87.60 1W/1m
* M(ms)= 53.36 grams
* C(ms)= 0.54 mm/N
* BL= 12.08
*


4
Manufacturer:
* Model:
* Piston Diameter = 161.9 mm
* f(s)= 29.61 Hz
* R(e)= 3.32 Ohms
* Z(max)= 179.90 Ohms
* Q(ms)= 11.550
* Q(es)= 0.217
* Q(ts)= 0.213
* V(as)= 32.300 liters (1.141 cubic feet)
* L(e)= 2.59 mH
* n(0)= 0.37 %
* SPL= 87.76 1W/1m
* M(ms)= 53.25 grams
* C(ms)= 0.54 mm/N
* BL= 12.31
*
*
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Can someone comment on my hornresp simulations on the MCM8?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how accurate are the box simulations? scampo77 Car Audio 20 3rd November 2009 04:06 AM
Seas L15 simulations Khron Multi-Way 3 11th April 2006 04:38 AM
Assistance with SPICE Simulations JMB Multi-Way 2 8th February 2006 09:28 PM
Xamp-simulations problem_s grataku Pass Labs 25 31st July 2003 05:10 PM
Protel simulations Kees Solid State 2 12th November 2002 03:47 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki