|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Savannah, GA
|
Hi all,
I happen to have two different model Aurum Cantus 10" midbass woofers lying around and I need to use a pair of them to replace the blown drivers in my TL line speakers. I'm no expert on TL's and I'm not sure if either of these speakers models would work well in a TL but I need to make a choice and go with it. The box is a 9ft tapered, bi-folded TL with sectional area equal to 125% of a 10" cone at the front of the line and 100% of cone area at the port end. Question: Which of these woofers would work best? Aurum Cantus AC-250F1 10" Woofer | Parts-Express.com Aurum Cantus AC-250MKII 10" Carbon Fiber Sandwich Woofer | Parts-Express.com thanks, Charlie
__________________
http://jazzman-esl-page.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Using MJK rule of thumb, the line is likely too small fro any 10" and long enuff to require a driver with very low Fs. Download Martin King's TL tables (and accompanying spreadsheet) and start plugging data in until you get output similar to your line.
Quarter Wavelength Loudspeaker Design If necessary it might be possible to shorten the line by cutting a new terminus. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Savannah, GA
|
Honestly, using the MLK calculators are over this old man's head and I'm just wondering which of the two drivers I mentioned would work the best.
__________________
http://jazzman-esl-page.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
I think the second one with the higher Qts will be the better choice for a TL.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
I'd guess that most 10" are too loarge for your cross-section. Even thou Sd has nothing to do with the end result of a TL, Martin suggests 3xSd as a starting point for the closed end. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Agreed, lots more tuning options since the cab is acoustically so large for the low Qt driver. If an 'install and forget' situation though, the higher Qt driver seems a better choice overall.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Midbass hump in TL speaker | rhapsodee | Multi-Way | 3 | 29th October 2009 03:19 PM |
| Sweet little $15 Woofer/Midbass | discreteouts | Multi-Way | 21 | 30th March 2008 12:24 AM |
| New woofer for TL Sub? | BAM | Subwoofers | 0 | 9th January 2005 02:51 AM |
| TL and the derivatives using two midbass drivers in a D'Appolito style configuration | Puggie | Multi-Way | 7 | 7th January 2005 02:04 PM |
| 8" 4 ohm heavy duty woofer/midbass needed, who's Goldwood? | eRiCdWoNg | Multi-Way | 11 | 29th February 2004 06:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09505 seconds (79.93% PHP - 20.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |