Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th November 2010, 02:37 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
CharlieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Savannah, GA
Default Which midbass woofer for TL?

Hi all,
I happen to have two different model Aurum Cantus 10" midbass woofers lying around and I need to use a pair of them to replace the blown drivers in my TL line speakers. I'm no expert on TL's and I'm not sure if either of these speakers models would work well in a TL but I need to make a choice and go with it. The box is a 9ft tapered, bi-folded TL with sectional area equal to 125% of a 10" cone at the front of the line and 100% of cone area at the port end.

Question: Which of these woofers would work best?

Aurum Cantus AC-250F1 10" Woofer | Parts-Express.com

Aurum Cantus AC-250MKII 10" Carbon Fiber Sandwich Woofer | Parts-Express.com

thanks,
Charlie
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 03:21 PM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Using MJK rule of thumb, the line is likely too small fro any 10" and long enuff to require a driver with very low Fs. Download Martin King's TL tables (and accompanying spreadsheet) and start plugging data in until you get output similar to your line.

Quarter Wavelength Loudspeaker Design

If necessary it might be possible to shorten the line by cutting a new terminus.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 04:14 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
CharlieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Savannah, GA
Honestly, using the MLK calculators are over this old man's head and I'm just wondering which of the two drivers I mentioned would work the best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 04:22 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
I think the second one with the higher Qts will be the better choice for a TL.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 04:43 PM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieM View Post
Honestly, using the MLK calculators are over this old man's head and I'm just wondering which of the two drivers I mentioned would work the best.
The tables are a simplified, no math required subset of the full MJK package. You plug the appropriate T/S parameters into the spreadsheet and see what it spits out.

I'd guess that most 10" are too loarge for your cross-section. Even thou Sd has nothing to do with the end result of a TL, Martin suggests 3xSd as a starting point for the closed end.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 04:45 PM   #6
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post
The tables
Top 2 of the links in the lower section here.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 05:46 PM   #7
bjorno is offline bjorno  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Send a message via MSN to bjorno
Quote:
Originally Posted by pieter t View Post
I think the second one with the higher Qts will be the better choice for a TL.
I think the first driver is more suitable in the OP:s TL box.

b
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2010, 08:10 PM   #8
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Agreed, lots more tuning options since the cab is acoustically so large for the low Qt driver. If an 'install and forget' situation though, the higher Qt driver seems a better choice overall.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Midbass hump in TL speaker rhapsodee Multi-Way 3 29th October 2009 03:19 PM
Sweet little $15 Woofer/Midbass discreteouts Multi-Way 21 30th March 2008 12:24 AM
New woofer for TL Sub? BAM Subwoofers 0 9th January 2005 02:51 AM
TL and the derivatives using two midbass drivers in a D'Appolito style configuration Puggie Multi-Way 7 7th January 2005 02:04 PM
8" 4 ohm heavy duty woofer/midbass needed, who's Goldwood? eRiCdWoNg Multi-Way 11 29th February 2004 06:11 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 AM.

Page generated in 0.09505 seconds (79.93% PHP - 20.07% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio