|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
Due to length of my port I can't fit the driver I have designed the enlcosure in the front, will it be okay in the bottom?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
It depends on the motor and cone mass. Too heavy and she sags causing permanent damage. See if you can search here or on Google, there's info somewhere on that. Either that or you rotate your cabinet so the bottom is now the side.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Alternatively put a bend in the port?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Definitive answer? No, it's going to be a compromise when you go against the physics and driver design considerations (no unit is better downfiring). That being said, if it's a dual coil with only 68 gr. moving mass and an Xmax of 4 mm then you're likely to have better results than most woofers. The sag will take longer to happen and will not be as extreme but the reason I pointed you to the google search is that this is a diy site and I was trying to stimulate a bit of the diy part. You should be fine. Now can you shows us a quick sketch of what you are doing and show us why you can't make the bottom of the box, the side? ie: rotate the cabinet.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
I notice the driver has a low Qms. That might mean a little more sag and bit more muddy of a sound but unless someone who knows more than me steps in, I would say go ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
Yeh here, the circle is where the driver would go but theres not enough room and the reason why I didn't want to rotate it is because the strongest side is at the bottom where the panel sits on top of the others. the box measures 400mm cubed which is 46l, the breath hole is 98mm diameter ID and is 300mm long.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for info on speaker building (NOT ENLCOSURE THE ACTUAL DRIVER) | hispls | Subwoofers | 13 | 4th June 2010 06:26 PM |
| Bottom limit for driver FA resonance? | bentoronto | Subwoofers | 9 | 26th September 2008 10:15 PM |
| Mounting the driver | Ant_222 | Subwoofers | 1 | 4th August 2006 01:48 AM |
| Driver mounting. | 2litre | Multi-Way | 9 | 21st January 2006 07:04 AM |
| Mounting transformers, capacitors, etc. to bottom of chassis | Possum | Parts | 20 | 28th September 2002 02:55 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09806 seconds (83.82% PHP - 16.18% MySQL) with 10 queries |