|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PDX
|
I am a little confused about what box to build for my new woofer:
the 12" KW-120-THX Subwoofer ![]() problem is when I plug it into a Linkwitz Transform spreadsheet from Trueaudio http://www.trueaudio.com/downloads/linkxfrm.xls it gives a 2ft^3 box response that goes only to 1 octave below the boxes resonance with a gain of ~10db. But this is the same response I could get from a similar sized ported enclosure! Is my math off? the woofers specs: Power handling: 500 watts RMS/1,000 watts max VCdia: 3" Le: 1.23 mH Impedance: 8 ohms Re: 5.79 ohms Frequency response: 20-1,000 Hz Fs: 28 Hz SPL: 86 dB 1W/1m Vas: 1.89 cu. ft. Qms: 3.31 Qes: 0.42 Qts: 0.37 Xmax: 25 mm 38lbs these were $200 at Partsexpress, but I think I got the last one, as I couldn't order 2...only one. what would work best? I have a nice Yamaha P2500s (~700w RMS bridged mono 8 ohm) to power it. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You determine how low the Linkwitz transform extends the frequency response by changing the values for f(p) and Q(p).
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
ESP - The Linkwitz Transform Circuit
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
What were the values of closed box TS you used for the spread sheet?
The value of the LT is, it allows a much smaller box (Vb<<Vas) with a high Q, but you are using it in a box bigger than Vas. Most people that prefer closed box SQ over ported because with a gradual LF roll off, it is easier to integrate into smaller spaces w/o booming bass response. Note. LF extension is not always the final goal. Build the small box (or simulate the model) and measure the resultant TS, calculate new values.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| >>> Project Floorstanding Cabinet Wanted <<< | presscot | Multi-Way | 2 | 28th July 2010 12:20 AM |
| > Audio <> music <> quick <> synergy <> angst>? | rick57 | Everything Else | 0 | 4th May 2007 04:03 PM |
| wanting to start a H/T project <<<NEWB!! | nissanrider06 | Everything Else | 5 | 3rd December 2005 07:19 AM |
| Looking for a good <70€ mid-bass, and nice <30€ tweeter | Bricolo | Multi-Way | 53 | 19th April 2003 10:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08689 seconds (73.50% PHP - 26.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |