|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
im new to this and i am having a hard time understanding Qts Qms Qes. it seems to be the mecahanical and electrical damping of a speaker. can someone please explain very slowly to me what this means?
i am used to seeing damping used in electrical engineering diagrams on paper, solved using differential equations. im not sure if this is even the same kind of damping. ex: over/under/critical damping if someone could put some real world words to this it would help me a lot. |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Qtc=Qts*sqrt(Vas/Vb+1) Fc=Fs*Qtc/Qts Transfer function: H(s)=sn^2/(sn^2+sn/Qtc+1) : sn=normalized frequency Qtc=0.5 is critically damped.... For anything else, go to wikipedia, or go to The Subwoofer DIY Page - applicable to more than just subwoofers..
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
thanks for the response but you told me almost nothing. what im looking for is someone who understands this topic enough to be able to explain electrical/mechanical damping in REAL words or possibly an analogy.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
|
Quote:
The Qes is a measure of the electromechanical damping caused by voice coil resistance and the interaction of the voice coil in the magnetic gap. A higher Qes means less electromechanical damping or a smaller magnet. The Qts is the total damping which is the combination of mechanical and electromechanical damping. Qms is always much larger than Qes because the electromechanical damping always dominates. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Qts: the higher the number = the drivers inability to come to rest after the electrical signal has ceased. a rating of 0.707 is just right for a lot of folks. If you like drier bass, around 0.5 - 0.6 is better. if you like speakers from the 70's, a little higher 0.8 - 1.0 will make your ears happy.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Will "Loudspeaker Cook book" by Vance Dickason be helpful ?
__________________
AM Last edited by ashok; 3rd August 2010 at 04:15 AM. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
probably if it helps explain TS parameters a bit better
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Here's your analogy. mechanical damping = shock absorber a velocity dependent force dissipating the energy in the suspension and cone mass. electrical damping = motor back emf try spinning a small DC electric motor with and without the power terminals shorted. also velocity dependent and dissipative, but sourced from the motion of the coil in a magnetic field, acting through the resistance of the coil + wires + amplifier output impedance. Ever heard of Lenz's law? Good luck.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley Last edited by Ron E; 4th August 2010 at 01:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
A good portion of this title can be previewed ( Google Books )...
Loudspeakers: for music recording and reproduction By Philip Newell, Philip Richard Newell, Keith Holland Chapter 1 : What is a Loudspeaker? On page 14 ( fig 1.7 ) is an equivalent circuit. ( This might help - Syd ) |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
so from what you guys are saying it seems like it is the mechanical and electrical drag or inefficiencies in the speaker? or the speakers "run on" after the music stops
i read the Qts dominates the box volume if this is true why would a speakers inefficiency determine box size? ive some across lenz's law in school but never more then just touched on it in class. i can see how this would add to the speaker "stopping itself unnecessarily and all of these answers seem to be clearing things up for me, thanks everyone |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does Qms, Qes, and Qts explain a driver? | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 29 | 27th March 2013 01:02 AM |
| what sounds best . . . Low Qts in small cab or higher Qts in bigger cab | mikelm | Subwoofers | 18 | 15th July 2009 10:46 AM |
| QES, QTS, QMS values for Hiquipon Ow1 | lovitz | Multi-Way | 1 | 20th January 2006 10:50 AM |
| Tuning Qes Qts Bl Mms | P Zolt | Multi-Way | 10 | 21st April 2005 05:24 PM |
| What if instead of a speaker with a Qts=1 I use a different Qts?? | Tuliman | Multi-Way | 2 | 14th December 2004 11:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |