|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Malaysia - Melaka
|
I am planning 2 build a center channel speaker and surround speaker for my PC audio system. Should i stick 2 the Traditional MTM design or MT design? Thanks alot.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For a PC system, why not stick to full-range drivers and add a subwoofer?
They eliminate the need for a crossover, and small PC speakers are unlikely to need treble help anyway (unless it's a really big screen and room)...
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
I;m with Chris on the FR...
an MTM would be hard to fit under of over a monitor... (don't even think about laying it sideways) dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Malaysia - Melaka
|
thanks for your guys opinions anyway. But i would like to design this system more towards gaming use and movies rather than songs (will be in bypass mode).
The mounting is not critical... the speaker enclosure will be suspended/supported using appropriate hooks. But i just want 2 know if the sound quality differs if using MTM vs MT design (matching with main speaker if using MTM) because my main speakers are in MT config. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
With MTM on a horizontal, you'd get lobing where frequencies constructively and destructively combine, as you move about the room. For one person in one place, that should be fine. Still, a decent full ranger is cheaper than a midbass and tweeter of similar performance. Plus, there's the crossover to work on.
I've used full-range drivers for gaming, they cope fine (Left4Dead2). Quality wise (and using the same budget for each project), the MT will sound better, simply because you won't have to spend extra on more speakers than necessary, meaning you can use better drivers. What's the rest of the system?
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MTM center channel suggestion | rinx | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th October 2009 07:17 AM |
| Horizontal MTM Center channel: avoiding off-axis nulls | DcibeL | Multi-Way | 27 | 10th October 2009 05:57 PM |
| MTM Transmission Line Design-Where To Consider Center Of Speaker | kelticwizard | Multi-Way | 4 | 8th December 2005 02:30 AM |
| MTM center channel project | Deagle50ae | Multi-Way | 23 | 15th March 2005 05:54 AM |
| MTM center channel wiring with 2 way active crossover | mik | Multi-Way | 0 | 2nd April 2004 11:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07063 seconds (79.95% PHP - 20.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |