|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Well, I'm finally taking the plunge - gonna build me a TH based on the new Dayton 12" PA driver - the PA310-8. Specs will be similar to the ones indicated below (I'm still doing some fine-tuning). I haven't finished the folding yet, but I'm looking to fit everything into a box that's approximately 3'x2'x1' (ok, slightly wider, as the driver has to be accomodated). It's destined to be used in a small bar (the rest of the spectrum will be provided by EV ZXA1s installed in various locations). I'll probably end up using four of them, or more, depending on how much output I get from this initial build. As DJs tend to be silly with the volume knob here, I'm trying to split the load across multiple cheap subs rather than one or two more expensive ones
.
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Quote:
I've built a LOT of subwoofers, and I'd probably have to say that I've never been happier with a subwoofer than I am with my TH-Mini clone. The usual caveats apply - for serious prosound use, the 'real' TH-Mini has more output than what I am using, and the drivers that Danley uses are known to be more durable. Seems to be a great little sub. Also, if you're going to purchase four drivers, why not do push-pull? I've used that on the last two I built, and the difference is NOT subtle. I actually ripped apart my "Triple8" sub from diymobileaudio and flipped one of the woofers, and that made a big difference. Last but not least, aren't you in another country? Faital Pro is more expensive than Dayton, but the shipping will cost less. Not sure what distributor you'd use, but this gives you an idea of the pricing: http://cgi.ebay.com/FAITAL-PRO-W12N8...#ht_2392wt_801 Last edited by Patrick Bateman; 2nd July 2010 at 05:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
This design is probably going to a look a bit like the TH-Mini, maybe slightly thinner
. Quote:
Yup, shipping is a b*tch. I'm not sure that I will save much by going with the Faital Pro - shipping will still be high. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Quote:
I'd read that Faital is manufactured in Mexico, and their website indicates that they have a factory in Puebla, so it seems like they'd offer a good value to folks in South America. But I just checked the box on the woofers that I purchased from them this week, and it says "Made in Italy." Hmmm. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
I might have more luck with Selenium stuff (I believe Brazil is the source for that). In fact, one of my friends built an entire PA rig (tops, midbass and horns) using Selenium components and plans they provided a few years ago and used it to provide the sounds for my brother's Carnival band. It was easily the clearest, cleanest and loudest rig on the road. OTOH, most of the competition basically seemed to be of the "what else can we fit on the truck" type. Maybe I should give their bass drivers another look... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Can someone help me fold this into a TH? I might end up using the simple folding scheme in my POC #1, but just looking for other ideas...
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Published specs:
Vas: 2.89 cu.ft. Fs: 44.4 Hz Qes: 0.34 Qms: 8.63 Qts: 0.32 Le: 1.5 mH Re: 5.7 Ohms Measured specs: Vas: 3.30 cu.ft. (need to confirm) Fs: 39.0 Hz Qes: 0.31 Qms: 7.50 Qts: 0.30 Le: 0.37 mH (!!) Re: 5.2 Ohms The low Le came as a big surprise. It's significantly different to the published spec. So much so that I measured the parameters of another driver with the WT3 just to ensure that it was still working (and measuring Le) properly (I got the expected Le for the test driver during those measurements). 0.37 it is. Published Xmax for the PA310-8 is 5mm, but some quick tests suggest that might be a bit on the generous side - the suspension seems to be applying the brakes quite a bit before 10mm p-p is reached and distortion quickly rises. On the plus side, I was unable to get it to bottom while driving it free air with low frequency test tones. I'm rethinking my TH idea. Maybe I should just go with a simple EBS alignment... Nah. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
The coil is much shorter (and less x-max) with a low value of Le.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
LOL - perhaps Xmax is really 0.5mm instead of 5.0 mm?
![]() Seriously I took a look at the coil (shone a flashlight through the spider), and it looks like there's what could be about 5mm sitting above the gap. Also, when I pushed the cone outwards, there was still a bit of coil in the gap at the point where the suspension brought the cone to a halt. More about the PA310-8 can be seen here: Dayton PA310-8 12" Pro Woofer | Parts-Express.com The specs claim a "Low distortion motor system w/copper cap." Perhaps that has something to do with the low measured Le. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
Didn't see the part about the copper cap, that would lower Le too.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vifa/Dayton/Dayton... First speaker for me, finally! | alexcd | Multi-Way | 6 | 29th November 2006 10:54 PM |
| I'm taking the plunge! | zagisrule! | Solid State | 3 | 2nd May 2004 09:29 PM |
| I finally took the plunge... | Marcus | Introductions | 0 | 30th October 2001 02:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |