|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
Has anybody experimented with port diameter? I mean, trying to maintain same resonance of port and Vb of enclosure but changing port diameter. what is the audioable difference?
I tried doing kind of experiment. when the port diameter is smaller it gives a feeling that apparently the speaker size is small. but when port diameter was increased bass was much cleaner, smoother and gave feeling of a larger speakers. Don't know what I experienced is true or just my kind of illusion. guys please share your experience or If you have any knowledge on this.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midland, Ontario
|
I don't "experiment " with size anymore, I usually just use the largest diameter port that's feasible to avoid port compression and the associated turbulance that introduces unwanted noise. It just makes sense to let out as much of the rear radiated sound from a woofer anyways(and helps with V.C. cooling!).I usually use port areas that are 25-35% of cone area. Did you try two different boxes with the same cubic footage and woofer, just different port diameters?, behind a curtain?
Sorry to not really answer your question, but yes I do find a larger port gives a more "robust" bass Last edited by Top Shelf; 9th May 2010 at 02:02 AM. Reason: incomplete |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
actually I was about to ask about different shape of boxes while keeping same cubic footage. Not only that but also different enclosure material. and variations in its wall thickness.
I wonder if there is any tool to simulate fq response based on box dimensions.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
...truth seeker...
diyAudio Member
|
Search
quarter wave.com MLQW It includes consideration of all the internal dimensions of the enclosure Consideration of material type & thickness remains to be developed
__________________
...call me Ed...Special Ed... EnABL kit http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-meet/119852-enabl-kit.html DCB1 parts http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-...ml#post2361098 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hertfordshire
|
Have you seen this?
Porting at Subwoofer-Builder.com Collo did some great work on ports..... My blog: Consort3′s Blog |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
Guys thanks for your reply... sure the links provide would be of great help to me.
I am facing a problem more. which I cant discuss under this subject. please have a look and be kind enough to help me.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
You can PM me at cred@rediffmail.com for any help that I may be able to render.
__________________
Sam |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why big port diameter? | Jay | Multi-Way | 22 | 13th March 2007 11:52 AM |
| Choosing port diameter. | Jeb-D. | Multi-Way | 8 | 18th August 2006 06:34 PM |
| Port Diameter | jwatts | Subwoofers | 18 | 19th May 2006 11:22 PM |
| Minimum Port Diameter | Narcisse91 | Subwoofers | 13 | 22nd March 2006 07:31 AM |
| Basic Q about port diameter(s) | joensd | Multi-Way | 2 | 29th April 2004 06:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08767 seconds (76.49% PHP - 23.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |