|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midland, Ontario
|
Only reason i ask is that the RCF's Par is 6.5 watts and the Peavey's is 11.6 watts, respectivly the Per's are 227 watts and 450 w? Does this mean if I dump 456 watts into the RCF the Par will double too? Do these two terms have any real bearing in designing,or not? Thanks for any input. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
That Ishtek calculator makes no sense to me and doesn't seem overly useful either. Why not use something that works a bit better? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
|
PAR is the peak acoustic power that may be produced at the speaker displacement limit (Xmax)
PER is the electrical power to produce PAR (note, this can be greater or smaller than the speakers thermal capability ISHTEK Speaker Design Bottom of page. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
|
I would use one of these programs instead.
This one is stand alone. LinearTeam This one requires Excel UniBox - Unified Box Model for Loudspeaker Design - Kristian Ougaard |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midland, Ontario
|
Thanks Soho, I didn't see that there
So if I put more power than Per into the specified enclosure than I will exceed the displacement limited power handling's xmax and will only see more distortion and perhaps mechanical damage....so the thermal handling far exceeds the mechanical ability???? Seems like a waste of a driver I guess the Peavey with its higher Per and Par would be a wiser choice for a driver then ,given that I want to have a 7 cu.ft box. I would still like to know if these are truly relevent parameters even though I will probably be going to another program?? Thanks again for the help |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
Quote:
Decent software should be able to calculate the efficiency (and display the frequency response etc) Yee-ha! Now you're getting somewhere. (Thanks for links, Soho) |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any Par-Metal Chassis Owner's out there? | Bengali | Everything Else | 13 | 20th March 2012 02:48 AM |
| VOX PAR-100 schematic | AuroraB | Instruments and Amps | 3 | 23rd June 2008 04:44 PM |
| par-tay speakers needed | ultrachrome | Multi-Way | 17 | 18th June 2006 11:46 PM |
| Did Par-Metal bite the dust? | hifimaker | Pass Labs | 1 | 1st January 2005 08:29 PM |
| Recieved my Par-Metal Case | PaulHilgeman | Parts | 3 | 3rd November 2003 04:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10039 seconds (74.55% PHP - 25.45% MySQL) with 10 queries |