|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I am planning on building a subwoofer in the near future, likely with 2 Mach 5 IXL 18" woofers in a sealed enclosure. I have an old 3'x2'x2' .75 inch thick MDF enclosure that I plan to recycle. Basically I want to put each driver on opposite sides of the enclosure, NOT isobarik.
Can anyone think of any problems with the drivers mounted back to back on opposite sides of the enclosure? The highest frequency it would be playing is around 100hz, which with a wavelength of 11.28 feet seems like I shouldnt have any phase cancellation issues (obviously I will have the polarity on each speaker opposite another) will I? It will only be about 1/5 wavelength difference between the two drivers at 100hz? If that is correct, how much cancellation would I get at that frequency in decibels? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
|
If you mean say a square enclosure with the drivers firing out of two opposite sides. With magnet structures pointing towards each other in the enclosure it's the same as having them on the same side.
You get zero phase issues, +3dB, and less vibration. Wire the drivers in phase, not out of polarity. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I attached a (not to scale) example of what I want to do. You are saying that the two drivers would need to be wired with the same polarity if hooked up that way? I dont think I understand why that is, I would assume that since they are facing opposite directions, the polarity would have to be switched on one.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
One idea whould be to mount one driver with the magnet sticking out and wiring it in antiphase. Acoustically they are in phase but mechanically they are out of phase.
That reduces K2 distortion by a factor of 3 because unlinearities in the suspension cancel. i have measured that effect on an open baffle but it should work in a closed cabinet too. Mechanical vibration also cancels. See my origigal Audio Physic Avanti for an example of the topology you plan and look at the Orion from Siegfried Linkwitz ( Linkwitz Lab - Loudspeaker Design) for the distortion canceling arangement in an H dipole. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Mounting the woofers this way (or inverting one mecahnically as Joachim suggests) is a very good idea. I do it whenever possible. The better you can get the mechanical coupling between the drivers, the more active vibration cancellation you will achieve.
2 18" in a sealed 3/4" enclosure could well suffer from ballooning thou. Hope it is well braced. dave dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.
|
Jochim is right-
If drivers are mounted on opposite side then there are a lot of issues. Can the woof be in a corner? How about 2 15s on the same side instead? On opposite side the crossover effects get pretty muddy. Yes it makes bass but will it match into the next higher frequency driver? Tough question.
__________________
What the other guy said----Standing on the shoulders of giants. New avatar- no more little array |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
At the frequencies involved, the drivers radiate omnidirectionally, it makes no difference from that POV which direction they face. Jochim suggests taking it a step further and mechanically inverting 1 driver to also cancel suspension non-linearities. This makes it harder to achieve really tight mechanical coupling and leaves the issue of the back of a basket sticking out (and the magnet and maybe an ugly vented polepiece). If your driver is really good (ie symmetrical suspension) this last step gives you little (Nick @ Llambda asserted you would gain nothing with his drivers) If possible i'll always use 2 smaller drivers push-push instead of a larger single driver for bass. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Yes, mechanical connection of inverted drivers is not easy ( Kef did that with a metal tube in the old days) and dstortion of the suspension is low in a closed cabinet anyway because they work on an "air spring" that is more linear then a mechanical suspension.
I tested that with my Klippel Laser Analyser and it is true. So go for the simple Push-Push version like i call it. Yes planet 10, two small drivers are faster then one big one but the parameters can make trouble to get deep bass. One solution is the Linkwitz transformer that allows wide choice of synthetic parameters. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
|
To couple the drivers effectively, wouldn't it be a simple and cheap option to mount them together and to the cabinet with long threaded rods? Especially on a driver with numerous mounting points.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opposing voice coils? | JCoffey | Subwoofers | 2 | 6th November 2008 02:54 PM |
| dual driver vibration cancellation really does work! | paulspencer | Subwoofers | 15 | 15th October 2006 06:14 AM |
| Dual Mono Gainclone Issues | cytokine | Chip Amps | 13 | 23rd November 2004 03:03 AM |
| Compression cancellation with dual voice coils | angel | Multi-Way | 21 | 17th June 2004 09:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11217 seconds (77.73% PHP - 22.27% MySQL) with 11 queries |