|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
Well Maybe not Crappy....but Yeah...Particle Board Box....no good.
Besides....the Port Chuffs at High Volumes probably because the Port is Non Flared and too Short/Small for the TB's Excursion Potential....this does move a Massive amount of Air! Any Recomendations for Box's? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I want that driver!
Not available in the UK, however, and shipping costs are too high for a teenager. I'd play on winISD for boxes. I expect they get used in small sealed boxes for cars quite often.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
Quote:
also where do you get WinISD from? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
To get a large enough port (cross sectional area) to avoid high port velocity and chuffing issues the port or ports have to be very long in relation to the size of the enclosure. There are two ways to get around this First consider the use of a external slot port that sort of wraps around the box and then exits at the front top or bottom as per the quick cross section sketch below Sub slot port.jpg Secondly consider using passive radiators, this is a proven method that provides all the benefits of a port without any of the negatives, ie chuffing - unmanageably long ports Last edited by Cokewithlime; 28th March 2010 at 04:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
Quote:
isnt the Radiator supposed to have more Excursion than the Active Woofer? the Dayton Radiator States 9 MM but the TB is 12 MM...can i use a Larger Radiator with the Smaller Woofer....like the 10 or 12 PR? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, that would work fine. The alternative is to use two of the 8" PRs, so you can get a nice symmetrical look.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
So with the TB that you are using, none of the Dayton PRs are a really good match. Probably the best match and also a really good price, since it is on sale right now is the 15" Exodus PR ($55) from DIYCable. btw - you will also need the mass kit($12) If you are trying to keep the box size down to bare minimum you could use w of these SEAS PRs or alternately you could go with a 2 of the CCS 10" PRs which have the added benefit of being able to adjust and fine tune the PRs mass from the outside of your enclosure at any time. Last edited by Cokewithlime; 29th March 2010 at 07:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
Quote:
![]() What Result do you Get by using a PR The same Size as the Active Driver? Also do you use the PR By itself or in Combination with a Port? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
In the following chart (based upon a design I already had for the baby brother(the 6.5” TB sub) of your TB 8” – you can see the following illustrated Pink trace = one PR the same size(6.5”) and xmax of the driver Blue trace = two PRs the same size(6.5”) and xmax of the driver Yellow trace = two 8’ PRs but same xmax of the driver PR Comparison.gif Please notice in the transfer function window that the yellow trace 2x8” PRs hold the level pretty constant and also achieve the best F3 for this driver – ie this combination maximizes the LF capability of the driver before the driver cone begins to unload. Also notice in the PR Cone Excursion window that a single PR(Pink trace) of the same size as the driver is pretty much useless since it will quickly exceed xmax just where it is most needed – ie at the tuning frequency - two PRs(Blue trace) of the same size(as the driver) are better but will probably also exceed their xmax as well. Finally the two larger 8” PRs (Yellow trace) would be moderately safe to use in this configuration(one 6.5” TB sub driver). Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Cokewithlime; 30th March 2010 at 05:02 AM. |
|||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tangband w8-1363sb - very small sub? | ractis | Subwoofers | 5 | 9th January 2010 09:59 PM |
| FS: TB W8-1363SB 8" Subwoofer | saabracer23 | Swap Meet | 0 | 11th May 2007 12:49 AM |
| FS: 2 X W8 740c (TangBand) | toseland | Swap Meet | 3 | 14th June 2006 08:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14578 seconds (76.69% PHP - 23.31% MySQL) with 11 queries |