|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Without EQing the heck out of it? (Invent new laws of physics?)
It has a 12" cut out for a driver. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I don't think a 3cub ft box can reach that target without EQ, but I'm just guessing.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
If you went ported or with passive radiators a single 12" in that size enclosure could easily achieve a F3 of 25Hz. Sealed you will probably require 2x 12"
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Hi,
you can reach any frequency limit with a small enclosure ... The compromise is between - efficiency - maximum sound pressure level (at given tolerated distortion level) - lower frequency limit - impulse response - cabinet size Extreme alignments in favour of one of these parameters cause the others to be compromised. A very small speaker with small membrane area will have excessive excursion above the tuning frequency, when tuned low. Use of a passive radiator does not change the limits of alignment, but helps to avoid a very long port which is neccessary for low tuning of small enclosures. Long channels may cause resonance problems and might refuse to work properly at the tuning frequency. As a rule of thumb, a port should not be longer than 1/12 wavelength of the tuning frequency, otherwise the port cannot be seen as a pure mass reactance anymore. When port has too small cross section you get noise from turbulent flow. Many simple BR calculators do not show the cone excursion of the driver dependent on frequency, which rises hope a cabinet could be tuned as you like without reaching mechanical limits. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
where does this come from?
He asked Quote:
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
|
Quote:
Quote:
Again with no EQ & 2 x 12" in a sealed box each driver would need to have an Fs of about 12.5Hz with a Qts of 0.35 & a Vas of about 1.5cuft (42L) or less due to volume taken up by the drivers in the enclosure. I know of no such animals LineArray has hit the nail on the head, you can't have it all - but you can have one thing. To go that low with no EQ you'd need a seriously inefficient driver which will result in a low output.
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
|
The idea that you can have any -3db point you want per volume is certainly valid. It's just that as cabinet volume decreases it eventually becomes impossible to maintain flat response without having driver displacement decrease, which means smaller diameter drivers, and lower efficiency.
There is no rule that says you can't have an 8" driver in 1.5 cu.ft. that goes flat to 25Hz. Easily achieveable with the right driver. The number of off the shelf driver candidates rises quickly if you're willing to add a bit of moving mass. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
|
Another "trick" you can pull with a suitably low Fs speaker is raising Qe by adding series resistance. Look at the poted response of the Tang Band W8-740P with a Qe raised to around .45. You'd have to calculate what this will do to Qts and precisely how much series resistance it would require. I didn't bother. Transient response will be adversely affected, overall efficiency will decrease futher, and Vb will inflate considerably. But, it would be essentially flat to 25Hz.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wellington
|
I have seen at least one driver (for car use) that had to be mounted with the magnet assembly outside the box, because the recommended enclosure volume was too small to accomodate the driver. In other words, the enclosure was smaller than the cardboard box the driver came in. As I recall, it was very inefficient - needed something like a 1000 watt amp. (No, I can't remember the driver model.)
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
It is achievable in that size enclosure but not without some compromises. For instance: - what was not provided was what his budget for drivers and amp would be - what his output SPL expectations would be - etc |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 0.50 ft3 Cabinet bracing | DIFORCE | Multi-Way | 3 | 17th January 2010 07:09 AM |
| Pioneer + Piezo in a 3 cu ft slotted box | ajh | Full Range | 3 | 25th September 2007 03:07 PM |
| iteration limit reached: another numb noob Q | Onvinyl | Everything Else | 3 | 9th March 2006 09:55 AM |
| is tuning at 25Hz too high? | Matt Neilson | Multi-Way | 22 | 1st July 2004 02:09 AM |
| 1.5 cu ft box | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 8 | 29th January 2004 01:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12490 seconds (78.26% PHP - 21.74% MySQL) with 11 queries |