Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Different implementation of the Linkwitz Transform.
Different implementation of the Linkwitz Transform.
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th January 2010, 09:25 PM   #1
chris661 is offline chris661  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
chris661's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sheffield
Default Different implementation of the Linkwitz Transform.

I've had this thought, so I figure I should let you guys pick it apart.

The actual depth of bass you hear from a speaker is subjective. Some say the -6dB point is significant, others argue the -10dB.

Anyway, I figure that, using a Linkwitz Transform, you could make the sub roll off to -6dB, then use the circuit to flatten it from there (if that makes sense). I'll try again. You don't eq the roll-off immediately, you wait for the -6dB point, then apply eq to make it flat across the frequency range, but at a constant -6dB.

Main advantage I can see is that it requires 6dB less gain than usual, but (according to subjective opinions) will still sound very deep.

If this is a bad idea, feel free to say so, because it's just an idea - I get loads of bonkers ideas like this. I figure that, one day, one of them will work...

Chris
__________________
My work: www.grimshawaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2010, 12:13 AM   #2
davygrvy is offline davygrvy  United States
diyAudio Member
 
davygrvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
With EQ, your world's an oyster. An LT defines a correction to end up with a specific freq response. Along with that final response is the time/impulse behavior, too.

Yes, of course, you can modify it to tailor how you want things. Don't forget about the limits of excursions, though, and nothing is wrong with using an additional 18Hz high-pass to protect things.

The shape of the response you want is very subjective I know how I like things.. I sweep a sinewave down and EQ for apparent equal loudness which gives me a very accentuated bottom, but that's how I like it.
__________________
Think out of the box
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2010, 11:48 PM   #3
NEO Dan is offline NEO Dan  United States
diyAudio Member
 
NEO Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: N.E. Ohio
Different implementation of the Linkwitz Transform.
The response shape you are referring to is not uncommon among ported subwoofers, it's an extended bass shelf = EBS. I like the non-bloated low end of the EBS.
__________________
Regards,
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Different implementation of the Linkwitz Transform.Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linkwitz Transform Circuit skogs Subwoofers 1 27th October 2006 12:03 AM
linkwitz transform peace brainerd Subwoofers 4 31st January 2006 02:13 AM
Linkwitz Riley Filter Implementation Roysyboy Subwoofers 1 19th September 2005 04:40 AM
Linkwitz Transform ding Multi-Way 10 11th July 2004 10:55 PM
Linkwitz Transform? Aunkst Chip Amps 6 29th March 2004 12:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki